The prevalence of venous thromboembolism in rectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) following rectal surgery is a significant and preventable cause of morbidity and mortality, yet the true prevalence is not well established. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the available literature and determined its prevalence following rectal surgery.
A systematic review assessed the prevalence of VTE following rectal surgery. In addition, we evaluated whether subgroups (open vs. minimally invasive or benign vs. malignant resections) impacted on its prevalence or rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE).
Thirty-eight studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. The aggregate prevalence of VTE following rectal surgery was 1.25% (95% CI 0.86–1.63), with DVT and PE occurring in 0.68% (95% CI 0.48–0.89) and 0.57% (95% CI 0.47–0.68) of patients. VTE following cancer and benign resection was 1.59% (95% CI 0.60–1.23 and 1.5% (95% CI 0.89–2.12) respectively. The prevalence of VTE in patients having minimally invasive resection was lower than those having open surgery [0.58% (16/2770) vs. 2.22% (250/11278); RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33–0.86].
This review observed that there is sparse evidence on prevalence of VTE following rectal surgery. It provides aggregated data and analysis of available literature, showing overall prevalence is low, especially in those having minimally invasive procedures.
KeywordsVenous thromboembolism Deep venous thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Rectal surgery Surgical outcomes
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.White RH, Zhou H, Romano PS (2003) Incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after different elective or urgent surgical procedures. Thromb Haemost 90(3):446–455Google Scholar
- 6.Merrill A, Millham F (2012) Increased risk of postoperative deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a study of national surgical quality improvement program patients. Dis Colon Rectum 55(9):e339Google Scholar
- 8.Agnelli G, Bolis G, Capussotti L, Scarpa RM, Tonelli F, Bonizzoni E, Moia M, Parazzini F, Rossi R, Sonaglia F, Valarani B, Bianchini C, Gussoni G (2006) A clinical outcome-based prospective study on venous thromboembolism after cancer surgery: the @RISTOS project. Ann Surg 243(1):89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Nicolaides AN, Fareed J, Kakkar AK, Comerota AJ, Goldhaber SZ, Hull R, Myers K, Samama M, Fletcher J, Kalodiki E, Bergqvist D, Bonnar J, Caprini JA, Carter C, Conard J, Eklof B, Elalamy I, Gerotziafas G, Geroulakos G, Giannoukas A, Greer I, Griffin M, Kakkos S, Lassen MR, Lowe GD, Markel A, Prandoni P, Raskob G, Spyropoulos AC, Turpie AG, Walenga JM, Warwick D (2013) Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism—international consensus statement. Int Angiol 32(2):111–260Google Scholar
- 11.Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM, Karanicolas PJ, Arcelus JI, Heit JA, Samama CM (2012) Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 141(2 Suppl):e227S–ee77SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M et al (2018) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Available from URL: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm. Accessed 26 June 2018
- 29.Causey MW, Nelson D, Johnson EK, Maykel J, Davis B, Rivadeneira DE, Champagne B, Steele SR (2014) The impact of model for end-stage liver disease-Na in predicting morbidity and mortality following elective colon cancer surgery irrespective of underlying liver disease. Am J Surg 207(4):520–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Rao AMK (2015) Laparoscopic assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma: a comparison in respect of postoperative recovery and complications. Pak J Med Health Sci 9(1):10–13Google Scholar
- 36.Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Chaudhry OO, Nguyen V, Pigazzi A, Carmichael JC et al (2013) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Arch Surg 148(1):65–71Google Scholar
- 58.NICE (2018) Venous Thromboembolism in over 16s. Available from URL: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng89. Accessed 30 June 2018
- 59.Mandalà M, Falanga A, Roila F, Group EGW (2011) Management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol 22(Suppl 6):vi85–vi92Google Scholar
- 60.Rausa E, Kelly ME, Asti E, Aiolfi A, Bonitta G, Winter DC et al (2018) Extended versus conventional thromboprophylaxis after major abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Surgery 164(6):1234–1240Google Scholar