Comparison of conventional access routes for right hemicolectomy in colon cancer—data from the DGAV StuDoQ registry
- 99 Downloads
Access for right hemicolectomy can be gained by median or transverse incision laparotomy. It is not known whether these routes differ with regard to short-term postoperative outcomes.
Patients in the DGAV StuDoQ|ColonCancer registry who underwent open oncological right hemicolectomy by median (n = 2389) or transverse laparotomy (n = 1311) were compared regarding Clavien–Dindo classification (CDC) complications (primary endpoint) as well as specific postoperative complications, operation time, length of stay, and MTL30 status (secondary endpoints).
A total of 3700 StuDoQ registry patients underwent open oncological right hemicolectomy by median (n = 2389) or transverse laparotomy (n = 1311) without additional interventions. The median and transverse access routes did not differ regarding CDC complication rates (CDC > =3a: 13.1% vs. 12.6%; p = 0.90). However, univariate and multivariate analyses showed that operation times (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62–0.81; p < 0.001), length of stay (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.6–079; p < 0.001), and MTL30 (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.61–0.81, p < 0.001) were significantly reduced in the transverse laparotomy group.
For oncological right hemicolectomy, open transverse upper abdominal laparotomy appears to be superior to median laparotomy in short-term course.
KeywordsAbdominal laparotomy Complete mesocolic excision Colon cancer Tranverse incision Midline incision Right side hemicolectomie
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Tenma JR, Wilhelmsen M, Rasmussen LA, Jepsen LV, Kristensen B, Gögenur I, the Copenhagen Complete Mesocolic Excision Study (COMES), the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) (2016) Short-term outcomes after complete mesocolic excision compared with ‘conventional’ colonic cancer surgery. Br J Surg 103(5):581–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Santoro A et al (2014) Transverse skin crease versus vertical midline incision versus laparoscopy for right hemicolectomy: a systematic review--current status of right hemicolectomy. Biomed Res Int 2014:643685Google Scholar
- 14.Wiegering A, Wellner U, Seyfried F, Hardt J, Klinger C, Buhr H, Post S (2017) MTL30 as surrogate parameter for quality of surgically treated diseases: establishment based on the StuDoQ register of the German society for general and visceral surgery. Chirurg 88(11):977–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-017-0479-z
- 16.Bosker RJI, Van’t Riet E, de Noo M, Vermaas M, Karsten TM, Pierie JP (2018) Minimally invasive versus open approach for right-sided colectomy: a study in 12,006 patientsfrom the Dutch surgical colorectal audit. Dig Surg. https://doi.org/10.1159/000486400
- 19.Brown SR, Goodfellow PB (2005) Transverse verses midline incisions for abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD005199. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005199.pub2