Advertisement

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 33, Issue 11, pp 1589–1594 | Cite as

Management of retrorectal supralevator abscess—results of a large cohort

  • Patrick Téoule
  • Steffen Seyfried
  • Andreas Joos
  • Dieter Bussen
  • Alexander Herold
Original Article
  • 101 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Proximal intersphincteric fistulas with proximal extension causing supralevatoric, retrorectal abscesses are a rare disease. There is only very limited experience, with small groups, and the limited published literature confirms the complexity of diagnostics and treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate transrectal internal abscess drainage as planned definitive treatment.

Methods

We retrospectively studied medical records of all patients with the diagnosis of retrorectal abscesses that underwent transrectal internal abscess drainage in the Department of Colo-proctology of the University Medical Centre Mannheim (2003–2012).

Results

One hundred nine patients were operated on retrorectal abscesses, 70 (64.2%) men and 39 (35.8%) women. Mean age was 45.3 years (18–81). In 96 cases (88.1%), only a transrectal internal abscess drainage was performed as planned definitive treatment. Primary healing occurred in 60 patients (62.5%). A second transrectal internal drainage procedure was necessary in 27 cases (28.1%) to assure complete internal drainage. All secondary procedures led to subsequent healing. A combined surgical treatment due to coexisting fistula tracts to the perianal skin or additional ischioanal abscesses was required in 13 patients (11.9%), and an additional seton placement was performed. Nine patients (9.4%) underwent one or more reoperations due to previously unidentified complex coexisting fistulas. Most of these patients were immunosuppressed due to Crohn’s disease. Internal drainage alone was successful in 90.6% with an overall healing rate of 94.5% for the entire population of complex fistulas.

Conclusions

Transrectal internal abscess drainage is a safe and highly successful procedure for treatment of retrorectal abscess, with very low risk of postoperative fecal incontinence. Inflammatory bowel disease and immunosuppressives have a negative impact on the healing process.

Keywords

Transanal internal abscess drainage Retrorectal abscess Intersphincteric fistula 

Notes

Authors’ contributions

PT, SS, and AH participated in the conception and design of the study. PT, SS, and AH performed the research, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. AJ and DB participated in the revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

384_2018_3094_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (404 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 403 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Eisenhammer S (1956) The internal anal sphincter and the anorectal abscess. Surg Gynecol Obstet 103:501–506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parks AG (1961) Pathogenesis and treatment of fistuila-in-ano. Br Med J 1:463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eisenhammer S (1978) The final evaluation and classification of the surgical treatment of the primary anorectal cryptoglandular intermuscular (intersphincteric) fistulous abscess and fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 21:237–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rickard MJ (2005) Anal abscesses and fistulas. ANZ J Surg 75:64–72.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03280.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hyman N (1999) Anorectal abscess and fistula. Prim Care 26:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nelson R (2002) Anorectal abscess fistula: what do we know? Surg Clin North Am 82:1139–1151 v–viCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosen L (1994) Anorectal abscess-fistulae. Surg Clin North Am 74:1293–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prasad ML, Read DR, Abcarian H (1981) Supralevator abscess: diagnosis and treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 24:456–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bernard D, Tasse D, Morgan S (1983) High intermuscular anal abscess and fistula: analysis of 25 cases. Can J Surg 26:136–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parks AG, Thomson JP (1973) Intersphincteric abscess. Br Med J 2:537–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wallin UG, Mellgren AF, Madoff RD, Goldberg SM (2012) Does ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract raise the bar in fistula surgery? Dis Colon Rectum 55:1173–1178.  https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e318266edf3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beck DE, Fazio VW, Lavery IC et al (1988) Catheter drainage of ischiorectal abscesses. South Med J 81:444–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garcia-Granero A, Granero-Castro P, Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Carreño O, Espí A, Puchades I, Garcia-Granero E (2014) Management of cryptoglandular supralevator abscesses in the magnetic resonance imaging era: a case series. Int J Color Dis 29:1557–1564.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-2028-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Millan M, Garcia-Granero E, Esclapez P et al (2006) Management of intersphincteric abscesses. Color Dis 8:777–780.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01035.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garcia-Granero A, Granero-Castro P, Frasson M et al (2014) The use of an endostapler in the treatment of supralevator abscess of intersphincteric origin. Color Dis 16:O335–O338.  https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12670 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty MannheimHeidelberg UniversityMannheimGermany
  2. 2.Deutsches End- und DickdarmzentrumMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations