Standardization of surgical procedures to reduce risk of anastomotic leakage, reoperation, and surgical site infection in colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study of 1189 patients

  • Ken Eto
  • Mitsuyoshi Urashima
  • Makoto Kosuge
  • Masahisa Ohkuma
  • Rota Noaki
  • Kai Neki
  • Daisuke Ito
  • Yasuhiro Takeda
  • Hiroshi Sugano
  • Katsuhiko Yanaga
Original Article
  • 144 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Anastomotic leakage (AL) and surgical site infection (SSI) are prevalent complications of colorectal surgery. To lower this risk, we standardized our surgical procedures in 2012, with a preferential use of laparoscopic approach (LS) for both colon and rectal surgery, combined with triangulating anastomosis (TA) for colon surgery and defunctioning ileostomy (DI) for low anterior resection. Our aim was to evaluate the outcomes of our standardized procedures.

Methods

The incidence rate of AL (primary outcome) and of reoperation and SSI (secondary outcome) was compared before (early period, n = 648) and after (late period, n = 541) standardization, through a retrospective analysis.

Results

The incidence rate of AL (6.6 versus 1.8%; P = 0.001), reoperation (3.5 versus 0.7%; P = 0.0012), and SSI (7.7 versus 4.6%; P = 0.029) was lower in late than in the early period. For colon cancer, TA and LS reduced the risk of AL (2.1 versus 0.3%, P = 0.020, for TA, and 3.2 versus 0.4%, P = 0.0027, for LS) and reoperation (2.9 versus 0.3%, P = 0.003, for TA, and 2.5 versus 0.2%, P = 0.0040, for LS). For rectal cancer, the incidence of all adverse outcomes (AL, reoperation, and SSI) was lower in cases treated by LS. However, the incidence of AL was lower in the late than in early period (P = 0.002) and with LS (P = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, late period and LS were independent factors of a lower risk of adverse outcomes.

Conclusions

Our surgical standardization seems to be effective in lowering the risks of AL, reoperation, and SSI after colorectal cancer surgery.

Keywords

Anastomotic leakage Reoperation Surgical site infections Laparoscopic surgery 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, Regimbeau JM, Pocard M, Valleur P (2002) Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 26:499–502.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0256-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Rodriguez JL, Granero-Castro P, Hervas D, Alvarez Rico MA, Brao MJ, Sanchez Gonzalez JM, Garcia-Granero E (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 262:321–330.  https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000000973 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leichtle SW, Mouawad NJ, Welch KB, Lampman RM, Cleary RK (2012) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 55:569–575.  https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182423c0d CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Turrentine FE, Denlinger CE, Simpson VB, Garwood RA, Guerlain S, Agrawal A, Friel CM, LaPar DJ, Stukenborg GJ, Jones RS (2015) Morbidity, mortality, cost, and survival estimates of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks. J Am Coll Surg 220:195–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.11.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nachiappan S, Askari A, Malietzis G, Giacometti M, White I, Jenkins JT, Kennedy RH, Faiz O (2015) The impact of anastomotic leak and its treatment on cancer recurrence and survival following elective colorectal cancer resection. World J Surg 39:1052–1058.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2887-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hawn MT, Vick CC, Richman J, Holman W, Deierhoi RJ, Graham LA, Henderson WG, Itani KM (2011) Surgical site infection prevention: time to move beyond the surgical care improvement program. Ann Surg 254:494–499.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822c6929 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tanner J, Padley W, Assadian O, Leaper D, Kiernan M, Edmiston C (2015) Do surgical care bundles reduce the risk of surgical site infections in patients undergoing colorectal surgery? A systematic review and cohort meta-analysis of 8,515 patients. Surgery 158:66–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blumetti J, Luu M, Sarosi G, Hartless K, McFarlin J, Parker B, Dineen S, Huerta S, Asolati M, Varela E, Anthony T (2007) Surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: do risk factors vary depending on the type of infection considered? Surgery 142:704–711.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Serra-Aracil X, Garcia-Domingo MI, Pares D, Espin-Basany E, Biondo S, Guirao X, Orrego C, Sitges-Serra A (2011) Surgical site infection in elective operations for colorectal cancer after the application of preventive measures. Arch Surg 146:606–612.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2011.90 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kurmann A, Vorburger SA, Candinas D, Beldi G (2011) Operation time and body mass index are significant risk factors for surgical site infection in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 25:3531–3534.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1753-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mahmoud NN, Turpin RS, Yang G, Saunders WB (2009) Impact of surgical site infections on length of stay and costs in selected colorectal procedures. Surg Infect 10:539–544.  https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2009.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Amri R, Bordeianou LG, Sylla P, Berger DL (2015) Renewed assessment of the stapled anastomosis with the increasing role of laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 29:2675–2682.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3989-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gustafsson P, Jestin P, Gunnarsson U, Lindforss U (2015) Higher frequency of anastomotic leakage with stapled compared to hand-sewn ileocolic anastomosis in a large population-based study. World J Surg 39:1834–1839.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-2996-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Katsuno H, Shiomi A, Ito M, Koide Y, Maeda K, Yatsuoka T, Hase K, Komori K, Minami K, Sakamoto K, Saida Y, Saito N (2016) Comparison of symptomatic anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic and open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1014 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 30:2848–2856.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4566-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70016-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kawada K, Hasegawa S, Hida K, Hirai K, Okoshi K, Nomura A, Kawamura J, Nagayama S, Sakai Y (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc 28:2988–2995.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3564-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Park JS, Choi GS, Kim SH, Kim HR, Kim NK, Lee KY, Kang SB, Kim JY, Lee KY, Kim BC, Bae BN, Son GM, Lee SI, Kang H (2013) Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group. Ann Surg 257:665–671.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b8ed9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Midura EF, Hanseman D, Davis BR, Atkinson SJ, Abbott DE, Shah SA, Paquette IM (2015) Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy: a national analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58:333–338.  https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000000249 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frasson M, Granero-Castro P, Ramos Rodriguez JL, Flor-Lorente B, Braithwaite M, Marti Martinez E, Alvarez Perez JA, Codina Cazador A, Espi A, Garcia-Granero E (2016) Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective, multicentric study of 1102 patients. Int J Color Dis 31:105–114.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2376-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kosuge M, Eto K, Hashizume R, Takeda M, Tomori K, Neki K, Mitsumori N, Yanaga K (2017) Which is the safer anastomotic method for colon surgery?—ten-year results. In Vivo 31:683–687CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mrak K, Uranitsch S, Pedross F, Heuberger A, Klingler A, Jagoditsch M, Weihs D, Eberl T, Tschmelitsch J (2016) Diverting ileostomy versus no diversion after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Surgery 159:1129–1139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.11.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kiran RP, El-Gazzaz GH, Vogel JD, Remzi FH (2010) Laparoscopic approach significantly reduces surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: data from national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg 211:232–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.03.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gervaz P, Bandiera-Clerc C, Buchs NC, Eisenring MC, Troillet N, Perneger T, Harbarth S (2012) Scoring system to predict the risk of surgical-site infection after colorectal resection. Br J Surg 99:589–595.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8656 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:250–278.  https://doi.org/10.1086/501620 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shiomi A, Ito M, Maeda K, Kinugasa Y, Ota M, Yamaue H, Shiozawa M, Horie H, Kuriu Y, Saito N (2015) Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1,014 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 220:186–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.10.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Messaris E, Connelly TM, Kulaylat AN, Miller J, Gusani NJ, Ortenzi G, Wong J, Bhayani N (2015) Is a diverting ostomy needed in mid-high rectal cancer patients undergoing a low anterior resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiation? An NSQIP analysis. Surgery 158:686–691.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wong NY, Eu KW (2005) A defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotic leak after a low anterior resection: a prospective, comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2076–2079.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0146-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fukunaga Y, Higashino M, Tanimura S, Osugi H (2007) Triangulating stapling technique for reconstruction after colectomy. Hepato-Gastroenterology 54:414–417PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yoshimatsu K, Ishibashi K, Yokomizo H, Umehara A, Yoshida K, Fujimoto T, Watanabe K, Ogawa K (2007) Triangulating anastomosis using a linear cutter in a colectomy. Hepato-Gastroenterology 54:1988–1990PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ken Eto
    • 1
  • Mitsuyoshi Urashima
    • 2
  • Makoto Kosuge
    • 1
  • Masahisa Ohkuma
    • 1
  • Rota Noaki
    • 1
  • Kai Neki
    • 1
  • Daisuke Ito
    • 1
  • Yasuhiro Takeda
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Sugano
    • 1
  • Katsuhiko Yanaga
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryJikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Division of Molecular EpidemiologyJikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations