Carcinoembryonic antigen reduction after medical treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 79 Downloads
The introduction of new drugs and multimodal treatments for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has reduced the importance of time-to-event endpoints and reported the attention on the response-related endpoints. Furthermore, the prognostic role of the surgical scores before the resection of metastases has not been confirmed for multimodal treatments. The purpose of this research is to perform a meta-analysis of the studies that evaluated the relationship between carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) response and outcome in patients with mCRC receiving systemic chemotherapy.
A systematic review of the literature on two databases and a selection of studies that evaluated the relationship between CEA response and outcome were performed according to predefined criteria. After, three meta-analyses were carried out on the selected studies, each for each outcome variable.
Nineteen studies have been selected. Fourteen studies (1475 patients) have documented a close association between radiological response and CEA response (odds ratio (OR), 9.03; confidence intervals (CIs), 5.14–15.87; I2 statistic (I2), 72%). Four studies have reported a longer progression-free survival for patients with a CEA response (hazard ratio (HR), 0.73; CIs, 0.64–0.83; I2, 23%). Finally, 10 studies (13 study cohorts) have shown a strong relationship between CEA response and overall survival (OS) (HR, 0. 62; CIs, 0.55–0.70; I2, 35%).
CEA response merits further investigation as a surrogate endpoint of clinical trials of first-line medical therapy of patients with mCRC, and should be studied as a prognostic factor for those patients who are candidates for multimodal treatment strategies.
KeywordsColorectal cancer Carcinoembryonic antigen Prognosis Multimodal therapy Endpoint
All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 3.Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, Poston GJ, Schlag PM, Rougier P, Bechstein WO, Primrose JN, Walpole ET, Finch-Jones M, Jaeck D, Mirza D, Parks RW, Mauer M, Tanis E, Van Cutsem E, Scheithauer W, Gruenberger T (2013) Perioperative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC 40983): long-term results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:1208–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.De Gramont A, Krulik M, Cady J, Lagadec B, Maisani JE, Loiseau JP, Grange JD, Gonzalez-Canali G, Demuynck B, Louvet C, Seroka J, Dray C, Debray J (1988) High-dose folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil bolus and continuous infusion in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 24:1499–1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Hamm CM, Cripps C (1998) Carcinoembryonic antigen in metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Invest Med 21:186–191Google Scholar
- 17.Rothenberg ML, Cox JV, DeVore RF, Hainsworth JD, Pazdur R, Rivkin SE, Macdonald JS, Geyer CE, Sandbach J, Wolf DL, Mohrland JS, Elfring GL, Miller LL, Von Hoff DD (1999) A multicenter, phase II trial of weekly irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with previously treated colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 85:786–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Wang WS, Lin JK, Lin TC, Chiou TJ, Liu JH, Yen CC, Chen WS, Jiang JK, Yang SH, Wang HS, Chen PM (2002) Tumor marker CEA in monitoring of response to tegafur-uracil and folinic acid in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterol 49:388–392Google Scholar
- 21.Trillet-Lenoir V, Chapuis F, Touzet S, Barbier JY, Freyer G, Gaudin JL, Lombard-Bohas C, Valette PJ, Lledo G, Gouttebel MC, Boyer JD, Chassignol L, Hamon H, Claudel-Bonvoisin S, Leprince E, Amoyal P, Glehen O, Darnand P, Heilmann MO, Bleuse JP (2004) Any clinical benefit from the use of oncofoetal markers in the management of chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinomas? Clin Oncol 16:196–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Ng SL, Burns WI, Snyder RD, Newnham GM, McLachlan SA, Liew D, Dowling AJ (2012) A retrospective cohort study of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, with an exploratory analysis of changing serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 8:172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Petrioli R, Licchetta A, Roviello G, Pascucci A, Francini E, Bargagli G, Conca R, Miano ST, Marzocca G, Francini G (2012) CEA and CA 19.9 as early predictors of progression on advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab. Cancer Investig 30:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Huang SC, Lin JK, Lin TC, Chen WS, Yang SH, Wang HS, Lan YT, Lin CC, Jiang JK, Chang SC (2015) Concordance of carcinoembryonic antigen ratio and response evaluation criteria in solid tumors as prognostic surrogate indicators of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 22:2262–2268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Stremitzer S, Stift J, Graf A, Singh J, Starlinger P, Gruenberger B, Tamandl D, Gruenberger T (2015) CEA change after neoadjuvant chemotherapy including bevacizumab and clinical outcome in patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 22:1315–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Michl M, Stintzing S, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Kiani A, Vehling-Kaiser U, Al-Batran SE, Heintges T, Lerchenmueller C, Kahl C, Seipelt G, Kullmann F, Stauch M, Scheithauer W, Hielscher J, Scholz M, Mueller S, Lerch MM, Modest DP, Kirchner T, Jung A, Heinemann V (2016) CEA response is associated with tumor response and survival in patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type and extended RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab (FIRE-3 trial). Ann Oncol 27:1565–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Huh JW, Oh BR, Kim HR, Kim YJ (2010) Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level as an independent prognostic factor in potentially curative colon cancer. J Surg Oncol 101:396–400Google Scholar
- 38.Tampellini M, Ottone A, Alabiso I, Barattelli C, Forti L, Berruti A, Aroasio E, Scagliotti GV (2015) The prognostic role of baseline CEA and CA 19-9 values and their time-dependent variations in advanced colorectal cancer patients submitted to first-line therapy. Tumor Biol 36:1519–1527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Garcia M, Seigner C, Bastid C, Choux R, Payan MJ, Reggio H (1991) Carcinoembryonic antigen has a different molecular weight in normal colon and in cancer cells due to N-glycosilation differences. Cancer Res 51:5679–5686Google Scholar
- 43.Das A, Kunkel M, Joudeh J, Dicker DT, Scicchitano A, Allen JE, Sarwani N, Yang Z, Kaifi J, Zhu J, Liao J, El-Deiry WS (2015) Clinico-pathological correlation of serial measurement of circulating tumor cells in 24 metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving chemotherapy reveals interpatient heterogeneity correlated with CEA levels but independent of KRAS and BRAF mutation. Cancer Biol Ther 16:709–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Lee JH, Kim SH, Jang HS, Chung HJ, Oh ST, Lee DS, Kim JG (2013) Preoperative elevation of carcinoembryonic antigen predicts poor tumor response and frequent distant recurrence for patients with rectal cancer who receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision: a multi-institutional analysis in an Asian population. Int J Color Dis 28:511–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Chiaravalloti A, Fiorentini A, Palombo E, Rinino D, Lacanfora A, Danieli R, Di Russo C, Di Biagio D, Squillaci E, Schillaci O (2016) Evaluation of recurrent disease in the re-staging of colorectal cancer by 18F-FDG PET/TC: use of CEA and CA 19-9 in patient selection. Oncol Lett 12:4209–4213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 62.Yoshino T, Obermannovà R, Bodoky G, Garcia-Carbnero R, Ciuleanu T, Portnoy DC, Kim TW, Hsu Y, Ferry D, Nasroulah F, Taberbero J (2017) Baseline carcinoembryonic antigen as a predictive factor of ramucirumab efficacy in RAISE, a second-line metastatic colorectal carcinoma phase III trial. Eur J Cancer 78:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 64.Shindoh J, Loyer EM, Kopetz S, Boonsirikamchai P, Maru DP, Chun YS, Zimmitti G, Curley SA, Charnsangavej C, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN (2012) Optimal morphologic response to preoperative chemotherapy: an alternate outcome end point before resection of hepatic colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol 30:4566–4572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 65.Iwanicki-Caron I, Di Fiore F, Roque I, Astruc E, Stetiu M, Duclos A, Tougeron D, Saillard S, Thureau S, Benichou J, Paillot B, Basuyau JP, Michel P (2008) Usefulness of the serum carcinoembryonic antigen kinetic for chemotherapy monitoring in patients with unresectable metastasis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3681–3686CrossRefGoogle Scholar