The adipofasciocutaneous gluteal fold perforator flap a versatile alternative choice for covering perineal defects
- 133 Downloads
Perineal defects following the resection of anorectal malignancies are a reconstructive challenge. Flaps based on the rectus abdominis muscle have several drawbacks. Regional perforator flaps may be a suitable alternative. We present our experience of using the gluteal fold flap (GFF) for reconstructing perineal and pelvic defects.
We used a retrospective chart review and follow-up examinations focusing on epidemiological, oncological (procedure and outcome), and therapy-related data. This included postoperative complications and their management, length of hospital stay, and time to heal.
Twenty-two GFFs (unilateral n = 8; bilateral n = 7) were performed in 15 patients (nine women and six men; anal squamous cell carcinoma n = 8; rectal adenocarcinoma n = 7; mean age 65.5 + 8.2 years) with a mean follow-up time of 1 year. Of the cases, 73.3% were a recurrent disease. Microscopic tumor resection was achieved in all but one case (93.3%). Seven cases had no complications (46.7%). Surgical complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system (grades I n = 2; II n = 2; IIIb n = 4). These were mainly wound healing disorders that did not affect mobilization or discharge. The time to discharge was 22 + 9.9 days. The oncological outcomes were as follows: 53.3% of the patients had no evidence of disease, 20% had metastatic disease, 20% had local recurrent disease, and one patient (6.7%) died of other causes.
The GFF is a robust, reliable flap suitable for perineal and pelvic reconstruction. It can be raised quickly and easily, has an acceptable complication rate and donor site morbidity, and does not affect the abdominal wall.
KeywordsGluteal fold flap Perineal reconstruction Pelvic reconstruction Abdominoperineal rectum excision Perforator flap
All authors listed meet the authorship criteria according to the latest guidelines of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
All authors are in agreement with the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
The manuscript has not been submitted simultaneously to another journal.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no financial support or relationships to disclose that may pose a conflict of interest.
- 2.Beier JP, Croner RS, Lang W, Arkudas A, Schmitz M, Gohl J, Hohenberger W, Horch RE (2015) Avoidance of complications in oncological surgery of the pelvic region : combined oncosurgical and plastic reconstruction measures. Chirurg 86(3):242–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-014-2835-6 Google Scholar
- 3.Davidge KM, Raghuram K, Hofer SO, Ferguson PC, Wunder JS, Swallow CJ, Zhong T (2014) Impact of flap reconstruction on perineal wound complications following ablative surgery for advanced and recurrent rectal cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 21(6):2068–2073. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3529-5 Google Scholar
- 8.Mughal M, Baker RJ, Muneer A, Mosahebi A (2013) Reconstruction of perineal defects. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 95(8):539–544. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588413x13629960047155,10.1308/rcsann.2013.95.8.539 Google Scholar
- 11.Goi T, Koneri K, Katayama K, Hirose K, Takashima O, Mizutani Y, Baba H, Yamaguchi A (2003) Modified gluteus maximus V-Y advancement flap for reconstruction of perineal defects after resection of intrapelvic recurrent rectal cancer: report of a case. Surg Today 33(8):626–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-003-2531-5 Google Scholar
- 16.Vaughan-Shaw PG, Cheung T, Knight JS, Nichols PH, Pilkington SA, Mirnezami AH (2012) A prospective case-control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life. Tech Coloproctol 16(5):355–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0851-4 Google Scholar
- 17.Lefevre JH, Parc Y, Kerneis S, Shields C, Touboul E, Chaouat M, Tiret E (2009) Abdomino-perineal resection for anal cancer: impact of a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneus flap on survival, recurrence, morbidity, and wound healing. Ann Surg 250(5):707–711. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bce334 Google Scholar
- 25.Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2 Google Scholar
- 27.Scott-Conner CE, Christie DW (1995) Cancer staging using the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM system. J Am Coll Surg 181(2):182–188Google Scholar
- 33.Wang ED, Conkling N, Xu X, Chern H, Finlayson E, Varma MG, Hansen SL, Foster RD, Hoffman WY, Sbitany H (2015) Perineal flap reconstruction following oncologic anorectal extirpation: an outcomes assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(1):176e–184e. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000000837 Google Scholar
- 34.Sunesen KG, Buntzen S, Tei T, Lindegaard JC, Norgaard M, Laurberg S (2009) Perineal healing and survival after anal cancer salvage surgery: 10-year experience with primary perineal reconstruction using the vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap. Ann Surg Oncol 16(1):68–77. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0208-4 Google Scholar
- 35.Devulapalli C, Jia Wei AT, DiBiagio JR, Baez ML, Baltodano PA, Seal SM, Sacks JM, Cooney CM, Rosson GD (2016) Primary versus flap closure of perineal defects following oncologic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(5):1602–1613. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000002107 Google Scholar
- 37.Chessin DB, Hartley J, Cohen AM, Mazumdar M, Cordeiro P, Disa J, Mehrara B, Minsky BD, Paty P, Weiser M, Wong WD, Guillem JG (2005) Rectus flap reconstruction decreases perineal wound complications after pelvic chemoradiation and surgery: a cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 12(2):104–110. https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.03.100 Google Scholar
- 47.Persichetti P, Cogliandro A, Marangi GF, Simone P, Ripetti V, Vitelli CE, Coppola R (2007) Pelvic and perineal reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection: the role of gracilis flap. Ann Plast Surg 59(2):168–172. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000252693.53692.e0 Google Scholar
- 58.Godbout E, Farmer L, Bortoluzzi P, Caouette Laberge L (2013) Donor-site morbidity of the inferior gluteal artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction in teenagers. Can J Plast Surg 21(1):19–22Google Scholar