Advertisement

Non-operative management of congenital tracheal stenosis: criteria by computed tomography

  • Masaya YamotoEmail author
  • Koji Fukumoto
  • Akinori Sekioka
  • Teruo Iwazaki
  • Kyouhei Sano
  • Toshiaki Takahashi
  • Kengo Nakaya
  • Akiyoshi Nomura
  • Yutaka Yamada
  • Naoto Urushihara
Original Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

Whether to perform surgical or conservative treatment for congenital tracheal stenosis (CTS) is controversial. Thus, the computed tomography (CT) criteria for conservative treatment of CTS were investigated.

Methods

From 2005 to 2017, 28 CTS cases were included. The operative cases and preoperative death cases constituted the required intervention group (group I), and the non-operative surviving cases constituted the observation group (group O). The diameter of the tracheal narrowest part (DTNP) on CT was evaluated as a criterion for non-operative follow-up.

Results

Chest CT was performed 19 times in 19 group I cases and 18 times in 9 group O cases. The median age of the patients that underwent CT scan examinations was 3.4 months (range 0–25 months) in group I and 22 months (range 0–60 months) in group O. The cut-off values of the non-operative criteria were 40.8% (AUC: 0.82, p < .01) normal for age of the trachea’s narrowest part, and 41.6% normal for body weight (AUC: 0.92, p < .01), respectively.

Conclusions

DTNP is 40% and more of the normal diameter appears necessary for non-surgical management. The present study suggests that the criteria for conservative management of CTS are that the DTNP is not less than 40% of the normal tracheal diameter, with a few symptoms.

Keywords

Congenital tracheal stenosis Computed tomography Non-operative management Criteria Operative management 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None declare.

Ethical approval

Clinical registration number: approval from the institutional ethics committee (approval number of 2017105).

References

  1. 1.
    Manson D, Babyn P, Filler R et al (1994) Three-dimensional imaging of the pediatric trachea in congenital tracheal stenosis. Pediatr Radiol 24:175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grillo HC, Zannini P (1984) Management of obstructive tracheal disease in children. J Pediatr Surg 19:414–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anton-Pacheco JL, Cano I, Garcia A et al (2003) Patterns of management of congenital tracheal stenosis. J Pediatr Surg 38:1452–1458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rutter MJ, Willging JP, Cotton RT (2004) Nonoperative management of complete tracheal rings. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:450–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johns AN (1981) Congenital tracheal stenosis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 3:157–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grillo HC (1994) Slide tracheoplasty for long-segment congenital tracheal stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 58:613–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tsang V, Murday A, Gillbe C et al (1989) Slide tracheoplasty for congenital funnel-shaped tracheal stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 48:632–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manning PB, Rutter MJ, Lisec A et al (2011) One slide fits all: the versatility of slide tracheoplasty with cardiopulmonary bypass support for airway reconstruction in children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Butler CR, Speggiorin S, Rijnberg FM et al (2014) Outcomes of slide tracheoplasty in 101 children: a 17-year single-center experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147:1783–1789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hong X, Zhou G, Liu Y et al (2015) Management of pulmonary artery sling with tracheal stenosis: LPA re-implantation without tracheoplasty. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:2741–2747Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chiu PP, Kim PC (2006) Prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of congenital tracheal stenosis: a multicenter analysis of the literature. J Pediatr Surg 41:221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morita K, Maeda K, Yabe K et al (2017) Management of congenital tracheal stenosis in the neonatal period. Pediatr Surg Int 33:1059–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang SC, Wu ET, Wang CC et al (2012) Surgical management of pulmonary artery sling: trachea diameter and outcomes with or without tracheoplasty. Pediatr Pulmonol 47:903–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brouns M, Jayaraju ST, Lacor C et al (2007) Tracheal stenosis: a flow dynamics study. J Appl Physiol 102:1178–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anton-Pacheco JL, Cano I, Comas J et al (2006) Management of congenital tracheal stenosis in infancy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29:991–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cheng W, Manson DE, Forte V et al (2006) The role of conservative management in congenital tracheal stenosis: an evidence-based long-term follow-up study. J Pediatr Surg 41:1203–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Manson D, Filler R, Gordon R (1996) Tracheal growth in congenital tracheal stenosis. Pediatr Radiol 26:427–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masaya Yamoto
    • 1
    Email author
  • Koji Fukumoto
    • 1
  • Akinori Sekioka
    • 1
  • Teruo Iwazaki
    • 2
  • Kyouhei Sano
    • 2
  • Toshiaki Takahashi
    • 1
  • Kengo Nakaya
    • 1
  • Akiyoshi Nomura
    • 1
  • Yutaka Yamada
    • 1
  • Naoto Urushihara
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric SurgeryShizuoka Children’s HospitalShizuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyShizuoka Children’s HospitalShizuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations