Letter to the Editor concerning: “the non-visualized appendix and secondary signs on ultrasound for pediatric appendicitis in the community hospital setting”
We read with interest the recent article by Held et al. that investigated the diagnostic value of secondary sonographic signs for pediatric appendicitis in the circumstance of a non-visualized appendix . The appendiceal visualization rate (AVR) is considered by many to be reflective of the quality of an ultrasound service. The AVR of 23.8% in this study is considered low. Numerous studies have reported benchmark standard rates of diagnostic accuracy for ultrasound in pediatric appendicitis, with visualization rates as high as 91.7% [2, 3, 4]. Consistent rates of high AVR are achievable with invested effort in training as well as spending the time required to employ numerous advanced strategies to localize the appendix . These include patient repositioning, distraction techniques, emptying and filling the urinary bladder, and breath-holding manoeuvers . We also strongly recommend a tightly curved array transducer as it allows more targeted graded compression and relative size appropriateness for younger children .
Complete visualization of the vermiform appendix in its entirety is obligatory for an accurate diagnostic examination. We support the authors’ acknowledgement that secondary sonographic signs for appendicitis have value as adjuncts to an imaging diagnosis, but stress that these should not be considered a reliable or acceptable substitute for poor quality ultrasound assessment represented by a low appendiceal visualization rate.
No funding was sought or obtained for the writing of this letter.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.