Advertisement

Pediatric Surgery International

, Volume 34, Issue 11, pp 1195–1200 | Cite as

Can time to healing in pediatric blunt splenic injury be predicted?

  • Catherine M. Dickinson
  • Roberto J. Vidri
  • Alexis D. Smith
  • Hale E. Wills
  • Francois I. Luks
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Current consensus guidelines do not recommend routine follow-up imaging for blunt splenic injury (BSI) in children. However, repeat imaging is recommended based on persistent symptoms. Wide variation of practice continues to exist among surgeons. By defining the natural evolution of BSI, we sought to identify patients at higher risk for delayed healing who could benefit from outpatient imaging.

Methods

A retrospective review of all children with BSI at a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center was completed. Grade of injury, hospital course, laboratory values and follow-up imaging results were obtained. Injured spleens were classified as ‘healed’, ‘healing’ (with echogenic scar), or ‘non-healing’ with persistence of parenchymal abnormalities.

Results

Between 2000 and 2014, 222 patients with BSI were identified. Seven patients (3%) underwent immediate splenectomy. Packed red blood cell transfusion was required in 13 (6%) of the 222 patients, and 3 (2%) of 145 with isolated splenic injuries. Seventy-one percent of patients underwent additional imaging 2–74 weeks post-injury. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to establish the relationship between sensitivity and specificity of capturing non-healing spleens over time. Optimal timing for post-injury imaging for grades I–II was 7–8 weeks; healing of higher-grade injuries could not accurately be predicted.

Conclusions

If return to full physical activity, in particular contact sports, is contingent upon documented healing of the splenic parenchyma after blunt trauma in the pediatric population, follow-up imaging for low-grade injuries is best obtained around 7–8 weeks. No such recommendations can be made for high-grade splenic injuries, as the exact time to healing cannot be predicted based on initial data.

Level of evidence

IV. Diagnostic test.

Keywords

Pediatric trauma Blunt splenic injury Imaging 

Notes

Author contributions

Catherine M. Dickinson, MD participated in the literature search, study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing, and critical revision of this manuscript. Roberto J. Vidri, MD participated in the literature search, study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing, and critical revision of this manuscript. Alexis D. Smith, MD participated in the literature search, data interpretation, writing, and critical revision of this manuscript. Hale E. Wills, MD participated in the data interpretation, writing, and critical revision of this manuscript. Francois I. Luks, MD, PhD participated in the study design, data analysis, data interpretation, writing, and critical revision of this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Financial disclosures

We have no financial disclosures.

References

  1. 1.
    Howman-Giles R, Gilday DL, Venugopal S, Shandling B, Ash JM (1978) Splenic trauma—nonoperative management and long-term follow-up by scintiscan. J Pediatr Surg 13(2):121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stylianos S (2000) Evidence-based guidelines for resource utilization in children with isolated spleen or liver injury. The APSA Trauma Committee. J Pediatr Surg 35(2):164–167 (discussion 167–9) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Notrica DM, Eubanks JW III, Tuggle DW, Maxson RT, Letton RW, Garcia NM, Alder AC, Lawson KA, St Peter SD, Megison S, Garcia-Filion P (2015) Nonoperative management of blunt liver and spleen injury in children: evaluation of the ATOMAC guideline using GRADE. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79(4):683–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Savage SA, Zarzaur BL, Magnotti LJ, Weinberg JA, Maish GO, Bee TK, Minard G, Schroeppel T, Croce MA, Fabian TC (2008) The evolution of blunt splenic injury: resolution and progression. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 64(4):1085–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stylianos S, Egorova N, Guice KS, Arons RR, Oldham KT (2006) Variation in treatment of pediatric spleen injury at trauma centers versus nontrauma centers: a call for dissemination of American Pediatric Surgical Association benchmarks and guidelines. J Am Coll Surg 202(2):247–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leinwand MJ, Atkinson CC, Mooney DP (2004) Application of the APSA evidence-based guidelines for isolated liver or spleen injuries: a single institution experience. J Pediatr Surg 39(3):487–490 (discussion 487–90) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martin K, VanHouwelingen L, Butter A (2011) The significance of pseudoaneurysms in the nonoperative management of pediatric blunt splenic trauma. J Pediatr Surg 46:933–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bird JJ, Patel NY, Mathiason MA, Schroeppel TJ, D’huyvetter CJ, Cogbill TH (2012) Management of pediatric blunt splenic injury at a rural trauma center. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73(4):919–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leschied JR, Mazza MB, Davenport MS, Chong ST, Smith EA, Hoff CN, Ladino-Torres MF, Khalatbari S, Ehrlich PF, Dillman JR (2016) Inter-radiologist agreement for CT scoring of pediatric splenic injuries and effect on an established clinical practice guideline. Pediatr Radiol 46(2):229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lynch JM, Meza MP, Newman B, Gardner MJ, Albanese CT (1997) Computed tomography grade of splenic injury is predictive of the time required for radiographic healing. J Pediatr Surg 32(7):1093–1095 (discussion 1095–6) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Emery KH, Babcock DS, Borgman AS, Garcia VF (1999) Splenic injury diagnosed with CT: US follow-up and healing rate in children and adolescents. Radiology 212:515–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huebner S, Reed MH (2001) Analysis of the value of imaging as part of the follow-up of splenic injury in children. Pediatr Radiol 31(12):852–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davies DA, Fecteau A, Himidan S, Mikrogianakis A, Wales PW (2009) What’s the incidence of delayed splenic bleeding in children after blunt trauma? An institutional experience and review of the literature. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 67(3):573–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frumiento C, Sartorelli K, Vane D (2000) Complications of splenic injuries: expansion of the nonoperative theorem. J Pediatr Surg 35(5):788–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kristoffersen KW, Mooney DP (2007) Long-term outcome of nonoperative pediatric splenic injury management. J Pediatr Surg 42:1038–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine M. Dickinson
    • 1
  • Roberto J. Vidri
    • 1
  • Alexis D. Smith
    • 1
  • Hale E. Wills
    • 1
  • Francois I. Luks
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Pediatric SurgeryAlpert Medical School of Brown University and Hasbro Children’s HospitalProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations