Advertisement

Pediatric Surgery International

, Volume 34, Issue 11, pp 1151–1155 | Cite as

Is contralateral inguinal exploration necessary in preterm girls undergoing inguinal hernia repair during the first months of life?

  • Marion Demouron
  • Xavier Delforge
  • Philippe Buisson
  • Mounia Hamzy
  • Céline Klein
  • Elodie Haraux
Original Article

Abstract

Background

To assess the need for contralateral surgical exploration in preterm girls with symptomatic unilateral inguinal hernia.

Methods

The medical data of girls operated for inguinal hernia between 2004 and 2016 in a single pediatric surgery center were retrospectively collected. Preterm girls operated for unilateral hernia before 6 months of life were selected (55/517 cases) to assess the incidence and risk factors for contralateral metachronous inguinal hernia (CMIH).

Results

CMIH was observed in 7% of cases (4 girls with a right inguinal hernia in 3 cases) at a mean age of 4.2 years. Only one case occurred early (3 months). Birth weight and term were comparable (1674 ± 620 g and 32 ± 5 WA without CMIH vs. 1694 ± 582 g and 33 ± 3 WA with CMIH).

Conclusion

Contralateral inguinal hernia is very rare and generally occurs several years after inguinal repair surgery in preterm girls, which should encourage practitioners to follow these children throughout childhood for the subsequent development of inguinal hernia. This study did not find any arguments in favor of systematic contralateral exploration in preterm girls.

Keywords

Hernia Preterm girls Contralateral Surgery 

Notes

Funding

This research did not receive any specific Grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

Research involving human participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Rothenberg RE, Barnett T (1955) Bilateral herniotomy in infants and children. Surgery 37:947–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maillet OP, Garnier S, Dadure C, Bringuier S, Podevin G, Arnaud A, Linard C, Fourcade L, Ponet M, Bonnard A, Breaud J, Lopez M, Piolat C, Sapin E, Harper L, Kalfa N (2014) Inguinal hernia in premature boys: should we systematically explore the contralateral side? J Pediatr Surg 49:1419–1423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.01.055 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pan ML, Chang WP, Lee HC, Tsai HL, Liu CS, Liou DM, Sung YJ, Chin TW (2013) A longitudinal cohort study of incidence rates of inguinal hernia repair in 0- to 6-year-old children. J Pediatr Surg 48:2327–2331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.06.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ron O, Eaton S, Pierro A (2007) Systematic review of the risk of developing a metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia in children. Br J Surg 94:804–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoshino M, Sugito K, Kawashima H, Goto S, Kaneda H, Furuya T, Hosoda T, Masuko T, Ohashi K, Inoue M, Ikeda T, Tomita R, Koshinaga T (2014) Prediction of contralateral inguinal hernias in children: a prospective study of 357 unilateral inguinal hernias. Hernia 18:333–337.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1099-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wenk K, Sick B, Sasse T, Moehrlen U, Meuli M, Vuille-dit-Bille RN (2015) Incidence of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernias in children following unilateral repair - A meta analysis of prospective studies. J Pediatr Surg 50:2147–2154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nataraja RM, Mahomed AA (2011) Systematic review for paediatric metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia: a decreasing concern. Pediatr Surg Int 27(9):953–961.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-2919-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Read RC, White JJ (1978) Inguinal herniation 1777–1977. Am J Surg 136:651–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boley SJ, Cahn D, Lauer T, Weinberg G, Kleinhaus S (1991) The irreducible ovary: a true emergency. J Pediatr Surg 26:1035–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Le Roux F, Lipsker A, Mesureur S, Haraux E (2016) Inguinal hernia repair in children: surgical technique. J Visc Surg 153:121–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.12.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Steven M, Greene O, Nelson A, Brindley N (2010) Contralateral inguinal exploration in premature neonates: is it necessary? Pediatr Surg Int 26:703–706.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-010-2614-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nagraj S, Sinha S, Grant H, Lakhoo K, Hitchcock R, Johnson P (2006) The incidence of complications following primary inguinal herniotomy in babies weighing 5 kg or less. Pediatr Surg Int 22:500–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burcharth J (2014) The epidemiology and risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia surgery. Dan Med J 61:B4846PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ballantyne A, Jawaheer G, Munro FD (2001) Contralateral groin exploration is not justified in infants with a unilateral inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 88:720–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee CH, Chen Y, Cheng CF, Yao CL, Wu JC, Yin WY, Chen JH (2016) Incidence of and risk factors for pediatric metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia: analysis of a 17-year nationwide database in Taiwan. PLoS One 11(9):e0163278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miltenburg DM, Nuchtern JG, Jaksic T, Kozinetz CA, Brandt ML (1997) Meta-analysis of the risk of metachronous hernia in infants and children. Am J Surg 174:741–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hays SR, Deshpande JK (2013) Newly postulated neurodevelopmental risks of pediatric anesthesia: theories that could rock our world. J Urol 189:1222–1228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.090 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Watanabe T, Nakano M, Endo M (2008) An investigation on the mechanism of contralateral manifestations after unilateral herniorrhaphy in children based on laparoscopic evaluation. J Pediatr Surg 43:1543–1547.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.11.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sumida W, Watanabe Y, Takasu H, Oshima K, Komatsuzaki N (2016) Effects of insistent screening for contralateral patent processus vaginalis in laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure to prevent metachronous contralateral onset of pediatric inguinal hernia. Surg Today 46:569–574.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1199-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zendejas B, Zarroug AE, Erben YM, Holley CT, Farley DR (2010) Impact of childhood inguinal hernia repair in adulthood: 50 years of follow-up. J Am Coll Surg 211:762–768.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.08.011 (Epub 2010 Oct 29) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maddox MM, Smith DP (2008) A long-term prospective analysis of pediatric unilateral inguinal hernias: should laparoscopy or anything else influence the management of the contralateral side? J Pediatr Urol 4:141–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.09.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Burd RS, Heffington SH, Teague JL (2001) The optimal approach for management of metachronous hernias in children: a decision analysis. J Pediatr Surg 36:1190–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    van Wessem KJ, Simons MP, Plaisier PW, Lange JF (2003) The etiology of indirect inguinal hernias: congenital and/or acquired? Hernia 7:76–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ozdemir T, Arıkan A (2013) Postoperative apnea after inguinal hernia repair in formerly premature infants: impacts of gestational age, postconceptional age and comorbidities. Pediatr Surg Int 29:801–804.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-013-3330-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Warner LO, Teitelbaum DH, Caniano DA, Vanik PE, Martino JD, Servick JD (1992) Inguinal herniorrhaphy in young infants: perianesthetic complications and associated preanesthetic risk factors. J Clin Anesth 4:455–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davidson AJ, Morton NS, Arnup SJ, de Graaff JC, Disma N, Withington DE, Frawley G, Hunt RW, Hardy P, Khotcholava M, von Ungern Sternberg BS, Wilton N, Tuo P, Salvo I, Ormond G, Stargatt R, Locatelli BG, McCann ME, General Anesthesia compared to Spinal anesthesia (GAS) Consortium (2015) Apnea after awake regional and general anesthesia in infants: the general anesthesia compared to spinal anesthesia study—comparing apnea and neurodevelopmental outcomes, a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 123:38–54.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000709 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zendejas B, Zarroug AE, Erben YM, Holley CT, Farley DR (2010) Impact of childhood inguinal hernia repair in adulthood: 50 years of follow-up. J Am Coll Surg 211:762–768.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.08.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aasvang EK, Kehlet H (2007) Chronic pain after childhood groin hernia repair. J Pediatr Surg 42:1403–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marion Demouron
    • 1
  • Xavier Delforge
    • 1
  • Philippe Buisson
    • 1
  • Mounia Hamzy
    • 1
  • Céline Klein
    • 1
  • Elodie Haraux
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric SurgeryAmiens University HospitalAmiens Cedex 1France
  2. 2.PeriTox-UMI 01, UFR de Médecine, Jules Verne University of PicardyAmiensFrance

Personalised recommendations