Advertisement

Climate Dynamics

, Volume 53, Issue 11, pp 6645–6663 | Cite as

Variations in ozone and greenhouse gases as drivers of Southern Hemisphere climate in a medium-complexity global climate model

  • Ramiro I. SaurralEmail author
  • Fred Kucharski
  • Gabriela A. Raggio
Article

Abstract

The climate of the Southern Hemisphere (SH) is being affected not only by the global increase in the concentration of greenhouse gases (GHG) but also by the ongoing recovery of stratospheric ozone. The competing roles of both are usually studied by means of state-of-the-art global climate models (GCM) due to the complexity in the atmospheric processes and interactions involved. The main objective of this paper is to determine whether quantitatively similar results can be achieved using a simpler, medium-complexity GCM. This includes addressing the sensitivity of the medium-complexity model to changes in GHG and ozone concentrations as well as looking into the plausible mechanisms driving such patterns of variations in atmospheric circulation, precipitation and temperature extremes. Two sets of simulations are performed: one with fixed sea surface temperatures (SST) and another one making use of a mixed-layer ocean model coupled to the GCM. Results show that the GCM is highly sensitive to changes in the atmospheric composition, and that the largest differences are found when SST are allowed to vary accordingly, particularly in the case of temperature extremes. Specific analyses are also performed on changes in subtropical precipitation over the continental regions of the SH, with moisture budget decomposition being applied in order to provide explanations for the rainfall changes described in the manuscript.

Keywords

Ozone and greenhouse gases Southern Hemisphere Moisture budget SPEEDY Global climate models 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that led to a substantial improvement of the paper. The first author acknowledges the support from the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics in the form of a Junior Associate position during which most of this research was done. Research leading to this manuscript has also been supported by Grant PICT 2016-1898 to the University of Buenos Aires.

Supplementary material

382_2019_4950_MOESM1_ESM.docx (4.7 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 4808 kb)

References

  1. Barnes EA, Polvani LM (2013) Response of the midlatitude jets, and of their variability, to increased greenhouse gases in the CMIP5 models. J Clim 26:7117–7135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes EA, Barnes NW, Polvani LM (2014) Delayed Southern Hemisphere climate change induced by stratospheric ozone recovery, as projected by the CMIP5 models. J Clim 27:852–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brönnimann S, Jacques-Coper M, Rozanov E, Fischer AM, Morgenstern O, Zeng G, Akiyoshi H, Yamashita Y (2017) Tropical circulation and precipitation response to ozone depletion and recovery. Environm Res Lett 12:064011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ceppi P, Hartmann D (2013) On the speed of the eddy-driven jet and the width of the Hadley cell in the Southern Hemisphere. J Clim 26:3450–3465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ceppi P, Zappa G, Shepherd TG, Gregory JM (2018) Fast and slow components of the extratropical atmospheric circulation response to CO2 forcing. J Clim 31:1091–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cherchi A, Alessandri A, Masina S, Navarra A (2011) Effects of increasing CO2 levels in monsoons. Clim Dyn 37:83–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi J, Son SW, Lu J, Min SK (2014) Further observational evidence of Hadley cell widening in the Southern Hemisphere. Geophys Res Lett 41:2590–2597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deser C, Phillips A (2009) Atmispheric circulation trends, 1950–2000: the relative roles of sea surface temperature forcing and direct atmospheric radiative forcing. J Clim 22:396–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Endo H, Kitoh A (2014) Thermodynamic and dynamic effects on regional monsoon rainfall changes in a warmer climate. Geophys Res Lett 41:1704–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. González PLM, Polvani LM, Seager R, Correa GJP (2014) Stratospheric ozone depletion: a key driver of recent precipitation trends in south eastern south America. Clim Dyn 42:1775–1792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hsu PC, Li T, Luo JJ, Murakami H, Kitoh A, Zhao M (2012) Increase of global monsoon area and precipitation under global warming: a robust signal? Geophys Res Lett 39:L06707.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu Y, Zhou C, Liu J (2011) Observational evidence for poleward expansion of the Hadley circulation. Adv Atmos Sci 28:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kang SM, Polvani LM, Fyfe JC, Sigmond M (2011) Impact of polar ozone depletion on subtropical precipitation. Science 332:951–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. King MP, Kucharski F, Molteni F (2010) The roles of external forcings and internal variabilities in the northern hemisphere atmospheric circulation change from the 1960s to the 1990s. J Clim 23:6200–6220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kodama Y (1992) Large-scale common features of subtropical precipitation zones (the Baiu frontal zone, the SPCZ, and the SACZ). Part I: characteristics of subtropical frontal zones. J Meteor Soc Jpn 70:813–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kucharski F, Molteni M, Bracco A (2006a) Decadal interactions between the western tropical Pacific and the North atlantic oscillation. Clim Dyn 26:79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kucharski F, Molteni F, Yoo JH (2006b) SST forcing of decadal Indian Monsoon rainfall variability. Geophys Res Lett 33:L03709.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kucharski F, Molteni F, King M, Farneti R, Kang IS, Feudale L (2013) On the need of intermediate complexity general circulation models: a ‘SPEEDY’ example. Bull Am Meteor Soc 94:25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kushner PJ, Held IM, Delworth TL (2001) Southern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation response to global warming. J Clim 14:2238–2249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee JY, Wang B (2014) Future change of global monsoon in the CMIP5. Clim Dyn 42:101–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu J, Song M, Hu Y, Ren X (2012) Changes in the strength and width of the hadley circulation since 1871. Clim Past 8:1169–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McLandress C, Shepherd TG, Scinocca JF, Plummer DA, Sigmond M, Jonsson AI, Reader MC (2011) Separating the dynamical effects of climate change and ozone depletion. Part II: Southern Hemisphere troposphere. J Clim 24:1850–1868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Molteni F (2003) Atmospheric simulations using a GCM with simplified physical parameterizations. I: model climatology and variability in multi-decadal experiments. Clim Dyn 20:175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Polvani LM, Waugh DW, Correa GJP, Son SW (2011a) Stratospheric ozone depletion: the main driver of 20th Century atmospheric circulation changes in the Southern Hemisphere. J Clim 24:795–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Polvani LM, Previdi M, Deser C (2011b) Large cancellation, due to ozone recovery, of future Southern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation trends. Geophys Res Lett 38:L04707.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL046712 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rauscher SA, Kucharski F, Enfield DB (2011) The role of regional SST warming variations in the drying of Meso-America in future climate projections. J Clim 24:2003–2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rodríguez-Fonseca B, Polo I, García-Serrano J, Losada T, Mohino E, Mechoso C, Kucharski F (2009) Are Atlantic Niños enhancing Pacific ENSO events in recent decades? Geophys Res Lett 36:L20705.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruggieri P, Kucharski F, Buizza R, Ambaum M (2017) The transient atmospheric response to a reduction of sea-ice cover in the Barents and Kara seas. Q J R Meteorol Soc 143:1632–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saurral RI, Camilloni IA, Barros VR (2017) Low-frequency variability and trends in centennial precipitation stations in southern South America. Int J Climatol 37:1774–1793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seager R, Naik N (2012) A mechanisms-based approach to detecting recent anthropogenic hydroclimate change. J Clim 25:236–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seager R, Naik N, Vecchi GA (2010) Thermodynamic and dynamic mechanisms for large-scale changes in the hydrological cycle in response to global warming. J Clim 23:4651–4668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Son SW, Tandon NF, Polvani LM, Waugh DW (2009) Ozone hole and Southern Hemisphere climate change. Geophys Res Lett 36:L15705.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038671 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stolarski RS, Douglass AR, Newman P, Pawson S, Schoeberl MR (2010) Relative contribution of greenhouse gases and ozone-depleting substances to temperature trends in the stratosphere: a chemistry-climate model study. J Clim 23:28–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Talento S, Barreiro M (2016) Simulated sensivity of the tropical climate to extratropical thermal forcing: tropical SSTs and African land surface. Clim Dyn 47:1091–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Talento S, Barreiro M (2018) Control of the South Atlantic convergence zone by extratropical thermal forcing. Clim Dyn 50:885–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thompson DWJ, Solomon S (2002) Interpretation of recent Southern Hemisphere climate change. Science 296:895–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Turner J, Colwell SR, Marshall GJ, Lachlan-Cope TA, Carleton AM, Jones PD, Lagun V, Reid PA, Iagovkina S (2005) Antarctic climate change during the last 50 years. Int J Climatol 25:279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Wessem JM, Reijmer CH, van de Berg WJ, van den Broeke MR, Cook A, van Ulft L, van Meijgaard E (2015) Temperature and wind climate of the Antarctic peninsula as simulated by a high-resolution regional atmospheric climate model. J Clim 28:7306–7326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilks DS (2006) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, 2nd. End. Academic Press, Waltham, p 141Google Scholar
  40. Zilli MT, Carvalho LMV, Lintner BR (2018) The poleward shift of south Atlantic convergence zone in recent decades. Clim Dyn.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4277-1 (In press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Centro de Investigaciones del Mar y la Atmósfera (CIMA/UBA-CONICET)Universidad de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.Departamento de Ciencias de la Atmósfera y los Océanos (DCAO/FCEN/UBA)Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y NaturalesBuenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.Institut Franco-Argentin d’Études sur le Climat et ses ImpactsUnité Mixte Internationale (UMI-IFAECI/CNRS-CONICET-UBA)Buenos AiresArgentina
  4. 4.Earth System Physics SectionInternational Centre for Theoretical PhysicsTriesteItaly
  5. 5.Center of Excellence for Climate Change Research/Department of MeteorologyKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations