Advertisement

Climate Dynamics

, Volume 53, Issue 3–4, pp 2451–2476 | Cite as

Quasi-stationary extratropical wave trains associated with distinct tropical Pacific seasonal mean convection patterns: observational and AMIP model results

  • Shuoyi Ding
  • Wen ChenEmail author
  • Hans-F. Graf
  • Zhang Chen
  • Tianjiao Ma
Article

Abstract

In this paper, mechanisms for the formation of quasi-stationary extratropical wave trains associated with four distinct winter patterns of seasonal mean tropical Pacific convection anomalies, including the western CP (W-CP) pattern, La Niña (LN) pattern, CP El Niño (CPEN) pattern and EP El Niño (EPEN) pattern, are investigated by utilizing observational and six Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (AMIP5) high-skilled models (ACCESS1.0, CanAM4, CCSM4, CMCC-CM, HadGEM2-A, MPI-ESM-LR) datasets. The observational results show that tropical Pacific forcing induces upper-level anomalous Rossby wave source that force vorticity over the central North Pacific through modulating the local Hadley circulation, then excite eastward propagation of quasi-stationary planetary waves penetrating into the North Atlantic, and finally establish the associated teleconnections in mid- and high-latitudes by local synoptic eddy–mean flow interaction. Different structures of wave trains may be explained by evident differences in intensity and scale of the extratropical vorticity forcing originating from distinct convection anomalies over the tropical Pacific. The MME results further confirm the possible physical processes obtained from observations, but there still exist some significant differences. These cover the North Pacific and North America and can possibly be attributed to the models’ simulation ability of extratropical vorticity forcing and local storm track intensity. In addition, the stratosphere–troposphere interaction plays an important role for extratropical atmospheric circulation anomalies. The stratospheric polar vortex not only modulates the underlying wave train, especially for the North Atlantic/Europe sector, but is also affected by the upper-tropospheric disturbance in high-latitudes through the upward wave activity flux.

Keywords

Tropical Pacific convection Extratropical wave train Synoptic eddy–mean flow interaction Extratropical vorticity forcing Storm track 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which led to significant improvement in the manuscript. This study is supported jointly by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0600604), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 41705051 and 41721004), the Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences (QYZDY-SSW-DQC024), and the Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Climate Change.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ambaum MHP, Hoskins BJ (2002) The NAO troposphere–stratosphere connection. J Clim 15(14):1969–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashok K, Behera SK, Rao SA, Weng H, Yamagata T (2007) El Niño Modoki and its possible teleconnection. J Geophys Res 112(C11):C11007.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003798 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brönnimann S, Xoplaki E, Casty C, Pauling A, Luterbacher J (2007) ENSO influence on Europe during the last centuries. Clim Dyn 28:181–197.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-006-0175-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai M, Yang S, Van den Dool HM, Kousky VE (2007) Dynamical implications of the orientation of atmospheric eddies: a local energetics perspective. Tellus A Dyn Meteorol Oceanogr 59(1):127–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castanheira JM, Graf HF (2003) North Pacific–North Atlantic relationships under stratospheric control? J Geophy Res 108(D1):4036.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002754 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castanheira JM, Liberato MLR, De La Torre L, Graf HF, DaCamara CC (2009) Baroclinic Rossby wave forcing and barotropic Rossby wave response to stratospheric vortex variability. J Atmos Sci 66(4):902–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen S, Yu B, Chen W (2014) An analysis on the physical process of the influence of AO on ENSO. Clm Dyn 42(3–4):973–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dai Y, Feldstein S, Tan B, Lee S (2017) Formation mechanisms of the Pacific/North American teleconnection with and without its canonical tropical convection pattern. J Clim 30:3139–3155.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0411.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ding S, Chen W, Feng J, Graf HF (2017) Combined impacts of PDO and two types of La Niña on climate anomalies in Europe. J Clim 30:3253–3278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ding S, Chen W, Graf HF, Guo Y, Nath D (2018a) Distinct winter patterns of tropical Pacific convection anomaly and the associated extratropical wave trains in the Northern Hemisphere. Clim Dyn 51(5–6):2003–2022.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3995-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ding S, Chen W, Graf HF, Guo Y (2018b) Patterns of tropical Pacific convection anomalies and associated extratropical wave trains in AMIP5. Clim Dyn.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4278-0 Google Scholar
  12. Feng J, Chen W, Li Y (2016) Asymmetry of the winter extra-tropical teleconnections in the Northern Hemisphere associated with two types of ENSO. Clim Dyn 48(7–8):2135–2151Google Scholar
  13. Garfinkel CI, Waugh DW, Gerber EP (2013) The effect of tropospheric jet latitude on coupling between the stratospheric polar vortex and the troposphere. J Clim 26(6):2077–2095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gouirand I, Moron V (2003) Variability of the impact of El Niño-Southern Oscillation on sea-level pressure anomalies over the North Atlantic in January to March (1874–1996). Int J Climatol 23:1549–1566.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.963 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graf HF, Zanchettin D (2012) Central Pacific El Niño, the ‘‘subtropical bridge’’, and Eurasian climate. J Geophys Res 117:D01102.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graf HF, Zanchettin D, Timmreck C, Bittner M (2014) Observational constraints on the tropospheric and near-surfacewinter signature of the Northern Hemisphere stratospheric polar vortex. Clim Dyn 43:3245–3266.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2101-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gregory D, Rowntree PR (1990) A mass flux convection scheme with representation of cloud ensemble characteristics and stability dependent closure. Mon Weather Rev 118(7):1483–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guo Y, Wen Z, Wu R, Lu R, Chen Z (2015) Impact of tropical pacific precipitation anomaly on the East Asian upper-tropospheric westerly jet during the boreal winter. J Clim 28(16):150527124226009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hendon HH, Hartmann DL (1985) Variability in a nonlinear model of the atmosphere with zonally symmetric forcing. J Atmos Sci 42(24):2783–2797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Honda M, Nakamura H (2001) Interannual seesaw between the Aleutian and Icelandic lows. Part II: its significance in the interannual variability over the wintertime northern hemisphere. J Clim 14:4512–4529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Honda M, Nakamura H, Ukita J, Kousaka I, Takeuchi K (2001) Interannual seesaw between the Aleutian and Icelandic lows. Part I: seasonal dependence and life cycle. J Clim 14:1029–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoskins BJ, James IN, White GH (1983) The shape, propagation and mean flow interactions of large scale weather systems. J Atmos Sci 40:1595–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang J, Higuchi K, Shabbar A (1998) The relationship between the North Atlantic Oscillation and El Niño-Southern Oscillation. Geophys Res Lett 25:2707–2710.  https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL01936 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hurrell JW, Hack JJ, Shea D, Caron JM, Rosinski J (2008) A new sea surface temperature and sea ice boundary dataset for the community atmosphere model. J Clim 21(19):5145–5153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jia XJ, Wang S, Lin H, Bao Q (2015) A connection between the tropical Pacific Ocean and the winter climate in the Asian-Pacific region. J Geophys Res 120(2):430–448Google Scholar
  26. Jia XJ, Ge JW, Wang S (2016) Diverse impacts of ENSO on wintertime rainfall over the Maritime Continent. Int J Climatol 36:3384–3397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jin F (2010) Eddy-induced instability for low-frequency variability. J Atmos Sci 67:1947–1964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jin F, Pan L, Watanabe M (2006a) Dynamics of synoptic eddy and low-frequency flow interaction. Part I: a linear closure. J Atmos Sci 63:1677–1694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jin F, Pan L, Watanabe M (2006b) Dynamics of synoptic eddy and low-frequency flow interaction. Part II: a theory for low-frequency modes. J Atmos Sci 63:1695–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson NC (2013) How many ENSO flavors can we distinguish? J Clim 26:4816–4827.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00649.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen J, Tnag SK, Hnilo JJ, Fiorino M, Potter GL (2002) NCEP-DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1631–1643.  https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lai AWC, Herzog M, Graf HF (2015) Two key parameters for the El Niño continuum: zonal wind anomalies and Western Pacific subsurface potential temperature. Clim Dyn 45(11–12):3461–3480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lau NC (1988) Variability of the observed midlatitude storm tracks in relation to low-frequency changes in the circulation pattern. J Atmos Sci 45:2718–2743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lau NC, Holopainen EO (1984) Transient eddy forcing of the time-mean flow as identified by geopotential tendencies. J Atmos Sci 41:313–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lau NC, Nath MJ (1991) Variability of the baroclinic and barotropic transient eddy forcing associated with monthly changes in the midlatitude storm tracks. J Atmos Sci 48:2589–2613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee T, McPhaden MJ (2010) Increasing intensity of El Niño in the central-equatorial Pacific. Geophys Res Lett 37:L14603.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044007 Google Scholar
  37. Li Y, Lau NC (2012a) Impact of ENSO on the atmospheric variability over the north Atlantic in late winter-Role of transient eddies. J Clim 25(1):320–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Li Y, Lau NC (2012b) Contributions of downstream eddy development to the teleconnection between ENSO and the atmospheric circulation over the North Atlantic. J Clim 25(14):4993–5010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li S, Hoerling MP, Peng S, Weickmann KM (2006) The annular response to tropical Pacific SST forcing. J Clim 19(9):1802–1819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ma TJ, Chen W, Nath D, Graf HF, Wang L, Huangfu JL (2018) East Asian winter monsoon impacts the ENSO-related teleconnections and North American seasonal air temperature prediction. Sci Rep 8:6547.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24552-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mo KC, Livezey RE (1986) Tropical-extratropical geopotential height teleconnections during the Northern Hemisphere winter. Mon Weather Rev 114(12):2488–2515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mudelsee M (2010) Climate time series analysis. Atmospheric and oceanographic sciences library, vol 42. Springer, Switzerland.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9482-7
  43. Neale RB, Richter JH, Jochum M (2008) The impact of convection on ENSO: from a delayed oscillator to a series of events. J Clim 21:5904–5924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nordeng TE (1994) Extended versions of the convective parameterization scheme at ECMWF and their impact on the mean and transient activity of the model in the tropics. ECMWF Tech Memo 206:41Google Scholar
  45. Park JH, An SI (2014) The impact of tropical western Pacific convection on the North Pacific atmospheric circulation during the boreal winter. Clim Dyn 43:2227–2238.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-2047-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pascolini-Campbell M, Zanchettin D, Bothe O, Timmreck C, Matei D, Jungclaus H, Graf HF (2015) Toward a record of Central Pacific El Niño events since 1880. Theor Appl Climatol 119(1–2):379–389.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-014-1114-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Perlwitz J, Graf HF (1995) The statistical connection between tropospheric and stratospheric circulation of the Northern Hemisphere in winter. J Clim 8:2281–2295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pinto JG, Reyers M, Ulbrich U (2011) The variable link between PNA and NAO in observations and in multi-century CGCM simulations. Clim Dyn 36(1–2):337–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Plumb RA (1985) On the three-dimensional propagation of stationary waves. J Atmos Sci 42(3):217–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rayner NA, Parker DE, Horton EB, Folland CK, Alexander LV, Rowell DP, Kent EC, Kaplan A (2003) Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J Geophys Res 108:4407.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jD002670 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Riddle EE, Stoner MB, Johnson NC, L’Heureux ML, Collins DC, Feldstein SB (2013) The impact of the MJO on clusters of wintertime circulation anomalies over the North American region. Clim Dyn 40:1749–1766.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1493-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sabin TP, Babu CA, Joseph PV (2013) SST-convection relation over tropical oceans. Int J Clim 33:1424–1435.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sardeshmukh PD, Hoskins BJ (1988) The generation of global rotational flow by steady idealized tropical divergence. J Atmos Sci 45:1228–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scaife AA, Spangehl T, Fereday DR et al (2012) Climate change projections and stratosphere–troposphere interaction. Clim Dyn 38(9–10):2089–2097.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1080-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simpkins GR, McGregor S, Taschetto AS (2014) Tropical connections to climatic change in the extratropical southern hemisphere: the role of Atlantic SST trends. J Clim 27:4923–4936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sun J, Tan B (2013) Mechanism of the wintertime Aleutian Low-Icelandic Low seesaw. Geophys Res Lett 40(15):4103–4108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Takaya K, Nakamura H (1997) A formulation of a wave-activity flux for stationary Rossby waves on a zonally varying basic flow. Geophys Res Lett 24:2985–2988.  https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL03094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Takaya K, Nakamura H (2001) A formulation of a phase-inpendent wave-activity flux for stationary and migratory quasigeostrophic eddies on a zonally varying basic flow. J Atmos Sci 58:608–627.  https://doi.org/10.1175/15200469(2001)058%3c0608:AFOAPI%3e2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tan B, Yuan J, Dai Y, Feldstein S, Lee S (2015) The linkage between the Eastern Pacific Teleconnection pattern and convective heating over the Tropical Western Pacific. J Clim 28:5783–5794.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00568.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:485–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tiedtke M (1989) A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models. Mon Weather Rev 117:1779–1800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Trenberth KE (1986) An assessment of the impact of transient eddies on the zonal flow during a blocking episode using localized Eliassen-Palm flux diagnostics. J Atmos Sci 43(19):2070–2087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Trenberth KE, Caron JM (2000) The Southern Oscillation revisited: sea level pressures, surface temperatures, and precipitation. J Clim 13(24):4358–4365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Walter K, Graf HF (2005) The North Atlantic variability structure, storm tracks, and precipitation depending on the polar vortex strength. Atmos Chem Phys 5(1):239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilks DS (2006) On ‘‘field significance’’ and the false discovery rate. J Appl Meteor Climatol 45:1181–1189.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2404.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wu R, Kirtman BP (2007) Regimes of local air-sea interactions and implications for performance of forced simulations. Clim Dyn 29:393–410.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0246-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhang GJ, McFarlane NA (1995) Sensitivity of climate simulations to the parameterization of cumulus convection in the Canadian Climate Centre general circulation model. Atmos Ocean 33(3):407–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zheng J, Liu Q, Wang C, Zheng XT (2013) Impact of heating anomalies associated with rainfall variations over the Indo-western Pacific on Asian atmospheric circulation in winter. Clim Dyn 40:2023–2033.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1478-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Atmospheric SciencesFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Center for Monsoon System Research, Institute of Atmospheric PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.College of Earth and Planetary SciencesUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.School of Atmospheric SciencesChengdu University of Information TechnologyChengduChina

Personalised recommendations