Advertisement

On the variation of the Pacific center: a revisit to the physical nature of Arctic Oscillation

  • Qian Cheng
  • Benkui TanEmail author
Article

Abstract

Based on daily data from NCEP/NCAR reanalysis for 1948/1949–2015/2016 winters (November through March), this study examines the physical nature of the Arctic Oscillation (AO). Results show that the AO events derived from the daily AO index consist basically of two types of events—the in-phase (IP) and out-of-phase (OP) events. For IP events, their Pacific and Arctic centers are of same signs, while for OP events, the two centers are of opposite signs, as in the traditional AO pattern. This implies that the AO pattern obtained from the empirical orthogonal function analysis is actually a statistics of these two types of events. It turns out that it is the strong IP and OP events with the Pacific centers of amplitude larger than 1.0 which play a crucial role in shaping the nature (the signs) and strength of the Pacific center. The formation features and roles of these strong IP and OP events in the seasonal and decadal variation and the stratospheric control of the Pacific center of the AO are also investigated. This study also suggests paying attention to strong IP and OP events when making weather prediction for the weather anomalies associated with these two types of events may have big differences in some regions.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. This research is supported by Chinese NSF Grants no. 41130962 and no. 41875065. The NCEP/NCAR reanalysis used in this study were obtained from http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/gridded/reanalysis/. Both authors are very grateful to Panxi Dai for discussions.

Supplementary material

382_2018_4583_MOESM1_ESM.docx (21 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21465 KB)

References

  1. Ambaum MH, Hoskins BJ, Stephenson DB (2001) Arctic Oscillation or North Atlantic Oscillation? J Clim 14(16):3495–3507.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014%3C3495:AOONAO%3E2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin MP, Dunkerton TJ (1999) Propagation of the Arctic Oscillation from the stratosphere to the troposphere. J Geophys Res Atmos 104(D24):30937–30946.  https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd900445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin MP, Dunkerton TJ (2001) Stratospheric harbingers of anomalous weather regimes. Science 294(5542):581–584.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063315 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castanheira JM, Graf HF (2003) North Pacific–North Atlantic relationships under stratospheric control? J Geophys Res Atmos 108(D1):ACL-11.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002754 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castanheira JM, Liberato MLR, Marques CAF, Graf HF (2007) Bridging the annular mode and North Atlantic Oscillation paradigms. J Geophys Res Atmos 112:D19.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castanheira JM, Liberato MLR, de La Torre L, Graf HF, Rocha A (2008) Annular versus nonannular variability of the northern hemisphere atmospheric circulation. J Clim 21(13):3180–3190.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2007jcli1960.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christiansen B (2001) Downward propagation of zonal mean zonal wind anomalies from the stratosphere to the troposphere: model and reanalysis. J Geophys Res Atmos 106(D21):27307–27322.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd000214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dai P, Tan B (2017) The nature of the Arctic Oscillation and diversity of the extreme surface weather anomalies it generates. J Clim 30(14):5563–5584.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0467.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deser C (2000) On the teleconnectivity of the “Arctic Oscillation”. Geophys Res Lett 27(6):779–782.  https://doi.org/10.1029/1999gl010945 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feldstein SB (2000) The timescale, power spectra, and climate noise properties of teleconnection patterns. J Clim 13(24):4430–4440.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013%3C4430:ttpsac%3E2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feldstein SB, Franzke C (2006) Are the North Atlantic Oscillation and the northern annular mode distinguishable? J Atmos Sci 63(11):2915–2930.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3798.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerber EP, Vallis GK (2005) A stochastic model for the spatial structure of annular patterns of variability and the North Atlantic Oscillation. J Clim 18(12):2102–2118.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli3337.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gong H, Wang L, Chen W, Nath D (2018) Multidecadal fluctuation of the wintertime Arctic Oscillation pattern and its implication. J Clim  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0530.1 (in press) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graf H-F, Zanchettin D, Timmreck C, Bittner M (2014) Observational constraints on the tropospheric and near-surface winter signature of the Northern Hemisphere stratospheric polar vortex. Clim Dyn 43(12):3245–3266.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2101-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Honda M, Nakamura H, Ukita J, Kousaka I, Takeuchi K (2001) Interannual seesaw between the Aleutian and Icelandic lows. Part I: seasonal dependence and life cycle. J Clim 14(6):1029–1042.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014%3C1029:isbtaa%3E2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kalnay E et al. (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077%3C0437:TNYRP%3E2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. North GR, Bell TL, Cahalan RF Moeng FJ (1982). Sampling errors in the estimation of empirical orthogonal functions. Mon Weather Rev 110(7):699–706.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1982)110%3C0699:seiteo%3E2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shi N, Bueh C (2012) The COWL pattern identified with a large AO index and its impact on annular surface temperature anomalies. Acta Meteorol Sin 26(4):410–419.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-012-0402-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shi N, Nakamura H (2014) Multi-decadal modulations in the Aleutian–Icelandic low seesaw and the axial symmetry of the Arctic Oscillation signature, as revealed in the 20th century reanalysis. Tellus A Dyn Meteorol Oceanogr 66(1):22660.  https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v66.22660 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sun J, Tan B (2013) Mechanism of the wintertime Aleutian low–Icelandic low seesaw. Geophys Res Lett 40(15):4103–4108.  https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50770 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Takaya K, Nakamura H (2001) A formulation of a phase-independent wave-activity flux for stationary and migratory quasigeostrophic eddies on a zonally varying basic flow. J Atmos Sci 58(6):608–627.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058%3C0608:afoapi%3E2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thompson DW, Wallace JM (1998) The Arctic Oscillation signature in the wintertime geopotential height and temperature fields. Geophys Res Lett 25(9):1297–1300.  https://doi.org/10.1029/98gl00950 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thompson DW, Wallace JM (2000) Annular modes in the extratropical circulation. Part I: month-to-month variability. J Clim 13(5):1000–1016.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013%3C1000:amitec%3E2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thompson DW, Wallace JM, Hegerl GC (2000) Annular modes in the extratropical circulation. Part II: trends. J Clim 13(5):1018–1036.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013%3C1018:amitec%3E2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wallace JM, Thompson DW (2002) The Pacific center of action of the Northern Hemisphere annular mode: real or artifact? J Clim 15(14):1987–1991.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015%3C1987:tpcoao%3E2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Woollings T, Hoskins B (2008) Simultaneous Atlantic–Pacific blocking and the northern annular mode. Q J R Meteorol Soc 134(636):1635–1646.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018
Corrected Publication 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of PhysicsPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations