Prediction and predictability of tropical intraseasonal convection: seasonal dependence and the Maritime Continent prediction barrier

  • Shuguang WangEmail author
  • Adam H. Sobel
  • Michael K. Tippett
  • Fréderic Vitart


Prediction and predictability of tropical intraseasonal convection in the WMO subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) forecast database is assessed using the real-time OLR based MJO (ROMI) index. ROMI prediction skill in the S2S models, as measured by the maximum lead time at which the bivariate correlation coefficient between forecasts and observations exceeds 0.6, ranges from ~ 15 to ~ 36 days in boreal winter, which is 5–10 days higher than the MJO circulation prediction skill based on the MJO RMM index. ROMI prediction skill is systematically lower by 5–10 days in summer than in winter. Predictability measures show similar seasonal contrast in the two seasons. These results indicate that intraseasonal convection is inherently less predictable in summer than in winter. Further evaluation of correlation skill assuming either perfect amplitude or perfect phase forecasts indicates that phase bias is the main contributor to skill degradation at longer forecast lead times. Nearly all the S2S models have lesser skill for target dates in which the MJO convection is centered over the Maritime Continent (MC) in boreal winter, and phase bias contributes to this MC prediction barrier. This issue is less prevalent in boreal summer. Many S2S models significantly underestimate ROMI amplitudes at longer forecast leads. Probabilistic evaluation of the S2S model skills in forecasting ROMI amplitude is further assessed using the ranked probability skill score (RPSS). RPSS varies significantly across models, from no skill to more than 30 days, which is partly due to model configuration and partly due to amplitude bias. Accounting for the systematic underestimates of the amplitude improves RPSS.



This research has been conducted as part of the NOAA MAPP S2S Prediction Task Force and supported by NOAA Grant NA16OAR4310076. SW and AHS also acknowledge support from NSF AGS-1543932 and ONR N00014-16-1-3073. We are grateful for the insightful comments by three anomalous reviewers. We thank Haibo Liu for obtaining and organizing the S2S data set from the ECMWF data portal.


  1. Baggett CF, Barnes EA, Maloney ED, Mundhenk BD (2017) Advancing atmospheric river forecasts into subseasonal-to-seasonal time scales. Geophys Res Lett 44:7528–7536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ding RQ, Li JP, Seo K (2010) Predictability of the Madden–Julian oscillation estimated using observational data. Mon Wea Rev 138:1004–1013. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ding RQ, Li JP, Seo K (2011) Estimate of the predictability of boreal summer and winter intraseasonal oscillations from observations. Mon Wea Rev 139:2421–2438. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fisher NI (1993) Statistical analysis of circular data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fu X, Lee JY, Hsu PC et al (2013) Multi-model MJO forecasting during DYNAMO/CINDY period. Clim Dyn 41:1067–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gottschalk J, Wheeler M, Weickmann K, Vitart F, Savage N, Lin H, Hendon H, Waliser D, Sperber K, Prestrelo C, Nakagawa M, Flatau M, Higgins W (2010) A framework for assessing operational model MJO forecasts: a project of the CLIVAR Madden–Julian oscillation Working Group. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91:1247–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoskins BJ (2013) The potential for skill across the range of the seamless weather-climate prediction problem: a stimulus for our science. Q J R Meteorol Soc 139:573–584. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Janiga MA, Schreck CJ, Ridout JA, Flatau M, Barton NP, Metzger EJ, Reynolds CA (2018) Subseasonal forecasts of convectively coupled equatorial waves and the MJO: activity and predictive skill. Mon Wea Rev 146:2337–2360. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jiang X, Waliser DE, Wheeler MC, Jones C, Lee M, Schubert SD (2008) Assessing the skill of an all-season statistical forecast model for the Madden–Julian oscillation. Mon Wea Rev 136:1940–1956. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jie W, Vitart F, Wu T, Liu X (2017) Simulations of Asian Summer monsoon in the sub-seasonal to seasonal prediction project (S2S) database. Q J R Meterol Soc. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones C, Waliser DE, Lau KM, Stern W (2004) Global occurrences of extreme precipitation and the Madden–Julian oscillation: observations and predictability. J Clim 17:4575–4589. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kang I, Kim H (2010) Assessment of MJO predictability for boreal winter with various statistical and dynamical models. J Clim 23:2368–2378. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kikuchi K, Wang B, Kajikawa Y (2012) Bimodal representation of the tropical intraseasonal oscillation. Clim Dyn 38:1989–2000. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kiladis GN, Dias J, Straub KH, Wheeler MC, Tulich SN, Kikuchi K, Weickmann KM, Ventrice MJ (2014) A comparison of OLR and circulation-based indices for tracking the MJO. Mon Wea Rev 142:1697–1715. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim H, Webster PJ, Toma VE, Kim D (2014) Predictability and prediction skill of the MJO in two operational forecasting systems. J Clim 27:5364–5378. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim H, Kim D, Vitart F, Toma VE, Kug J, Webster PJ (2016) MJO propagation across the Maritime Continent in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. J Clim 29:3973–3988. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klingaman NP et al (2015) Vertical structure and physical processes of the Madden–Julian oscillation: linking hindcast fidelity to simulated diabatic heating and moistening. J Geophys Res Atmos 120:4690–4717. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krishnamurti TN, Subramanian D (1982) The 30–50 day mode at 850 mb during MONEX. J Atmos Sci 39:2088–2095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee JY, Wang B, Wheeler MC, Fu X, Waliser DE, Kang I-S (2013) Real-time multivariate indices for the boreal summer intraseasonal oscillation over the Asian summer monsoon region. Clim Dyn 40:493–509. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li T, Wang L, Peng M, Wang B, Zhang C, Lau W, Kuo H (2018) A paper on the tropical intraseasonal oscillation published in 1963 in a Chinese journal. Bull Am Meteor Soc 99:1765–1779. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liebmann B, Smith CA (1996) Description of a complete (interpolated) outgoing long-wave radiation dataset. Bull Am Meteor Soc 77:1275–1277Google Scholar
  22. Lim Y, Son S, Kim D (2018) MJO prediction skill of the subseasonal-to-seasonal prediction models. J Clim 31:4075–4094. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lin H, Brunet G, Derome J (2008) Forecast skill of the Madden–Julian oscillation in two Canadian atmospheric models. Mon Wea Rev 136:4130–4149. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lin H, Brunet G, Derome J (2009) An observed connection between the North Atlantic oscillation and the Madden–Julian oscillation. J Clim 22:364–380. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ling J, Bauer P, Bechtold P, Beljaars A, Forbes R, Vitart F, Ulate M, Zhang C (2014) Global versus local MJO forecast skill of the ECMWF Model during DYNAMO. Mon Wea Rev 142:2228–2247. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Madden RA, Julian PR (1971) Detection of a 40–50 day oscillation in the zonal wind in the tropical Pacific. J Atmos Sci 28:702–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Madden RA, Julian PR (1972) Description of global-scale circulation cells in the tropics with a 40–50 day period. J Atmos Sci 29:1109–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marshall AG, Hendon HH, Hudson D (2016), Visualizing and verifying probabilistic forecasts of the Madden-Julian oscillation, Geophys Res Lett 43:12,278–12,286. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neena JM, Lee JY, Waliser D, Wang B, Jiang X (2014) Predictability of the Madden–Julian oscillation in the intraseasonal variability hindcast experiment (ISVHE). J Clim 27:4531–4543. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rashid HA, Hendon HH, Wheeler MC, Alves O (2011) Prediction of the Madden–Julian oscillation with the POAMA dynamical prediction system. Clim Dyn 36:649–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Robertson AW, Kuma A, Peña M, Vitart F (2015) Improving and promoting subseasonal to seasonal prediction. Bull Am Meteor Soc 96:ES49–ES53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sobel AH, Wang S, Kim D (2014) Moist static energy budget of the MJO during DYNAMO. J Atmos Sci 71:4276–4291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Straub KH (2013) MJO initiation in the real-time multivariate MJO index. J Clim 26:1130–1151. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ventrice MJ, Wheeler MC, Hendon HH, Schreck CJ, Thorncroft CD, Kiladis GN (2013) A modified multivariate Madden–Julian oscillation index using velocity potential. Mon Wea Rev 141:4197–4210. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vitart F (2014) Evolution of ECMWF sub-seasonal forecast skill scores. Q J R Meteorol Soc 140:1889–1899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vitart F (2017) Madden—Julian oscillation prediction and teleconnections in the S2S database. QJR Meteorol Soc 143:2210–2220. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vitart F, Molteni F (2010) Simulation of the MJO and its teleconnections in the ECMWF forecast system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 136:842–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vitart F et al (2017) The subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) prediction project database. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 98:163–173. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Waliser DE, Lau KM, Stern W, Jones C (2003) Potential predictability of the Madden–Julian oscillation. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 84:33–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang W, Hung MP, Weaver SJ, Kumar A, Fu X (2014) MJO prediction in the NCEP climate forecast system version 2. Clim Dyn 42:2509–2520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang S, Sobel AH, Zhang F, Sun Q, Yue Y, Zhou L (2015) Regional simulation of the october and november MJO events observed during the CINDY/DYNAMO field campaign at gray zone resolution. J Clim 28:2097–2119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang S, Sobel AH, Nie J (2016) Modeling the MJO in a cloud-resolving model with parameterized large-scale dynamics: Vertical structure, radiation, and horizontal advection of dry air. J Adv Model Earth Syst. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang S, Anichowski A, Tippett M, Sobel A (2017) Seasonal noise vs. subseasonal signal: forecasts of California precipitation during the unusual winters of 2015–16 and 2016–17. Geophys Res Lett. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang S, Ma D, Sobel AH, Tippett MK (2018) Propagation characteristics of BSISO indices. Geophys Res Lett. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weber NJ, Mass CF (2017) Evaluating CFSv2 subseasonal forecast skill with an emphasis on tropical convection. Mon Wea Rev 145:3795–3815. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wheeler M, Kiladis GN (1999) Convectively coupled equatorial waves: analysis of clouds and temperature in the wavenumber–frequency domain. J Atmos Sci 56:374–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wheeler MC, Hendon HH (2004) An all-season real-time multivariate MJO index: Development of an index for monitoring and prediction. Mon Wea Rev 132:1917–1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilks DS (2011) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, 3rd edn. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  49. Wu J, Ren HL, Zuo JQ et al (2016) MJO prediction skill, predictability, and teleconnection impacts in the Beijing Climate Center Atmospheric General Circulation Model. Dyn Atmos Oceans 75:78–90. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Xiang B, Zhao M, Jiang X et al (2015) The 3–4-week MJO prediction skill in a GFDL coupled model. J Clim 28:5351–5364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xie YB, Chen SJ, Zhang IL, Hung YL (1963) A preliminarily statistic and synoptic study about the basic currents over southeastern Asia and the initiation of typhoon. Acta Meteorol Sin 33(2):206–217Google Scholar
  52. Yasunari T (1979) Cloudiness fluctuations associated with the northern hemisphere summer monsoon. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 57:227–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yoneyama K, Zhang C, Long CN (2013) Tracking pulses of the Madden-Julian oscillation. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:1871–1891. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang C (2013) Madden–Julian oscillation: bridging weather and climate. Bull Am Meteor Soc 94:1849–1870. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang C, Gottschalck J, Maloney ED, Moncrieff M, Vitart F, Waliser DE et al (2013) Cracking the MJO nut. Geophys Res Lett 40:1223–1230. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Physics and Applied MathematicsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia UniversityPalisadesUSA
  3. 3.European Centre for Medium-Range Weather ForecastsReadingUK

Personalised recommendations