Advertisement

How Gulf-Stream SST-fronts influence Atlantic winter storms

Results from a downscaling experiment with HARMONIE to the role of modified latent heat fluxes and low-level baroclinicity
  • Hylke de Vries
  • Sebastian Scher
  • Rein Haarsma
  • Sybren Drijfhout
  • Aarnout van Delden
Article

Abstract

The strong horizontal gradients in sea surface temperature (SST) of the Atlantic Gulf Stream exert a detectable influence on extratropical cyclones propagating across the region. This is shown in a sensitivity experiment where 24 winter storms taken from ERA-Interim are simulated with HARMONIE at 10-km resolution. Each storm is simulated twice. First, using observed SST (REF). In the second simulation a smoothed SST is offered (SMTH), while lateral and upper-level boundary conditions are unmodified. Each storm pair propagates approximately along the same track, however their intensities (as measured by maximal near-surface wind speed or 850-hPa relative vorticity) differ up to ± 25%. A 30-member ensemble created for one of the storms shows that on a single-storm level the response is systematic rather than random. To explain the broad response in storm strength, we show that the SST-adjustment modifies two environmental parameters: surface latent heat flux (LHF) and low-level baroclinicity (B). LHF influences storms by modifying diabatic heating and boundary-layer processes such as vertical mixing. The position of each storm’s track relative to the SST-front is important. South of the SST-front the smoothing leads to lower SST, reduced LHF and storms with generally weaker maximum near-surface winds. North of the SST-front the increased LHF tend to enhance the winds, but the accompanying changes in baroclinicity are not necessarily favourable. Together these mechanisms explain up to 80% of the variability in the near-surface maximal wind speed change. Because the mechanisms are less effective in explaining more dynamics-oriented indicators like 850 hPa relative vorticity, we hypothesise that part of the wind-speed change is related to adjustment of the boundary-layer processes in response to the LHF and B changes.

Keywords

Atlantic winter storms Gulf Stream SST-fronts 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been funded by the PRIMAVERA project under Grant agreement 641727 in the European Commission’s Horizon 2020 research program. Author contribution statement: SS developed the initial ideas leading to this study; HdV and SS did the simulations and analyzed the data; HdV drafted the manuscript and all authors discussed the results and helped in improving the manuscript. The authors thank dr. James Booth, the reviewers and the editor for their constructive comments.

References

  1. Anthes RA, Kuo YH, Gyakum JR (1983) Numerical simulations of a case of explosive marine cyclogenesis. Mon Weather Rev 111:1174–1188.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Booth JF, Thompson L, Patoux J, Kelly KA, Dickinson S (2010) The signature of the midlatitude tropospheric storm tracks in the surface winds. J Clim 23(5):1160–1174.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3064.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Booth JF, Thompson L, Patoux J, Kelly KA (2012) Sensitivity of midlatitude storm intensification to perturbations in the sea surface temperature near the Gulf Stream. Mon Weather Rev 140(4):1241–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis CA, Stoelinga MT, Kuo YH (1993) The integrated effect of condensation in numerical simulations of extratropical cyclogenesis. Mon Weather Rev 121:2309–2330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ, Berrisford (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137(656):553–597.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eady ET (1949) Long waves and cyclone waves. Tellus 1:33–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giordani H, Caniaux G (2001) Sensitivity of cyclogenesis to sea surface temperature in the Northwestern Atlantic. Mon Weather Rev 129(6):1273–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacobs N, Raman S, Lackmann G, Childs P Jr (2008) The influence of the Gulf Stream induced SST gradients on the US East Coast winter storm of 24–25 January 2000. Int J Remote Sens 29(21):6145–6174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuo YH, Low-Nam S, Reed RJ (1991) Effects of surface energy fluxes during the early development and rapid intensification stages of seven explosive cyclones in the Western Atlantic. Mon Weather Rev 119(2):457–476.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuo YH, Shapiro MA, Donall EG (1991b) The interaction between baroclinic and diabatic processes in a numerical simulation of a rapidly intensifying extratropical marine cyclone. Mon Weather Rev 119:368–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lindstedt D, Lind P, Kjellström E, Jones C (2015) A new regional climate model operating at the meso-gamma scale: performance over Europe. Tellus A 67:24138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ma X, Chang P, Saravanan R, Montuoro R, Hsieh JS, Wu D, Lin X, Wu L, Jing Z (2015) Distant influence of Kuroshio eddies on north Pacific weather patterns? Sci Rep 5:17785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Methven J, Hoskins BJ, Heifetz E, Bishop CH (2005) The counter-propagating Rossby-wave perspective on baroclinic instability. IV: Nonlinear life cycles. Q J R Meteorol Soc 131:1425–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Minobe S, Kuwano-Yoshida A, Komori N, Xie SP, Small RJ (2008) Influence of the Gulf Stream on the troposphere. Nature 452(7184):206–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moore RW, Montgomery MT (2004) Reexamining the dynamics of short-scale, diabatic Rossby waves and their role in midlatitude moist cyclogenesis. J Atmos Sci 61:754–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Petterssen S, Smebye S (1971) On the development of extratropical cyclones. Q J R Meteorol Soc 97:457–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Piazza M, Terray L, Boé J, Maisonnave E, Sanchez-Gomez E (2015) Influence of small-scale north atlantic sea surface temperature patterns on the marine boundary layer and free troposphere: a study using the atmospheric ARPEGE model. Clim Dyn 46:1–19Google Scholar
  18. Reynolds RW, Smith TM, Liu C, Chelton DB, Casey KS, Schlax MG (2007) Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J Clim 20(22):5473–5496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roebber PJ (1989a) On the statistical analysis of cyclone deepening rates. Mon Weather Rev 117:2293–2298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roebber PJ (1989b) The role of surface heat and moisture fluxes associated with large-scale ocean current meanders in maritime cyclogenesis. Mon Weather Rev 117(8):1676–1694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roebber PJ, Schumann MR (2011) Physical processes governing the rapid deepening tail of maritime cyclogenesis. Mon Weather Rev 139(9):2776–2789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sanders F (1986) Explosive cyclogenesis in the west-central North Atlantic Ocean, 1981–84. Part I: composite structure and mean behavior. Mon Weather Rev 114(10):1781–1794.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sanders F, Gyakum JR (1980) Synoptic-dynamic climatology of the Bomb. Mon Weather Rev 108(10):1589–1606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scher S, Haarsma RJ, de Vries H, Drijfhout SS, van Delden AJ (2017) Resolution dependence of extreme precipitation and deep convection over the Gulf Stream. J Adv Model Earth Syst 9:1186–1194.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000903 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sheldon L, Czaja A, Vanniere B, Morcrette C, Casado M, Smith D (2016) “A warm path” to gulf stream-troposphere interactions (in preperation, personal communication) Google Scholar
  26. Small RJ, Tomas RA, Bryan FO (2014) Storm track response to ocean fronts in a global high-resolution climate model. Clim Dyn 43(3–4):805–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de Vries H, Methven J, Frame THA, Hoskins BJ (2010) Baroclinic waves with parameterized effects of moisture interpreted using Rossby wave components. J Atmos Sci 67:2766–2784.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3410.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Royal Netherlands Meteorological InstituteDe BiltThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Meteorological Institute and Bolin Centre for Climate ResearchStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  3. 3.University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  4. 4.IMAUUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations