Advertisement

Climate Dynamics

, Volume 52, Issue 5–6, pp 2565–2584 | Cite as

Patterns of tropical Pacific convection anomalies and associated extratropical wave trains in AMIP5

  • Shuoyi Ding
  • Wen ChenEmail author
  • Hans-F. Graf
  • Yuanyuan Guo
Article
  • 113 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, the performance of 18 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models forced by observational SSTs in simulating the tropical Pacific convective variation and the atmospheric responses in the extratropics are assessed. The multi-model ensemble mean results of 18 CMIP5 models show that five major patterns of tropical Pacific convection anomaly in winter can indeed be well reproduced, however, the simulation of the corresponding extratropical responses for each pattern exists some deficiency except for the La Niña pattern compared with observations. We defined an optimized subset of well performing models (ACCESS1.0, CanAM4, CCSM4, CMCC-CM, HadGEM2-A, MPI-ESM-MR) in tropical Pacific deep convection according to the ranking of model skill score. These models exhibit approximately identical convection anomaly patterns in both amplitude and spatial structure to the observation, which potentially might improve the representation of extratropical teleconnections with the tropical Pacific, especially for the CP El Niño (CPEN), EP El Niño (EPEN) and western CP (W-CP) patterns. Both evident atmospheric anomalies of CPEN and EPEN patterns over the NA/E sector and the northeastward propagating wave trains of W-CP pattern can be quite well simulated in the high-skilled models.

Keywords

AMIP5 model Tropical Pacific convection Extratropical wave train High-skilled model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which led to significant improvement in the manuscript. This study is supported jointly by the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant no. 2016YFA0600604), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 41721004), and the Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences (QYZDY-SSW-DQC024).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arakawa A, Schubert WH (1974) Interaction of a cumulus cloud ensemble with the large-scale environment, Part I. J Atmos Sci 31(3):674–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashok K, Behera SK, Rao SA, Weng H, Yamagata T (2007) El Niño Modoki and its possible teleconnection. J Geophys Res 112(C11):C11007.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003798 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Betts A, Miller M (1986) A new convective adjustment scheme. Part II: single column tests using GATE wave, BOMEX, ATEX and arctic air-mass data sets. Q J R Meteorol Soc 112:693–709Google Scholar
  4. Bougeault P (1985) A simple parameterization of the large-scale effects of cumulus convection. Mon Weather Rev 113(12):2108–2121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bretherton C, McCaa J, Grenier H (2004) A new parameterization for shallow cumulus convection and its application to marine subtropical cloud-topped boundary layers. Part I: description and 1D results. Mon Weather Rev 132:864–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Del Genio A, Yao M, Jonas J (2007) Will moist convection be stronger in a warmer climate? Geophys Res Lett 34(16):L16703Google Scholar
  7. Ding S, Chen W, Graf HF, Guo Y, Nath D (2017) Distinct winter patterns of tropical Pacific convection anomaly and the associated extratropical wave trains in the Northern Hemisphere. Clim Dyn.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3995-0 Google Scholar
  8. Donner L (1993) A cumulus parameterization including mass fluxes, vertical momentum dynamics, and mesoscale effects. J Atmos Sci 50:889–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emanuel KA (1991) A scheme for representing cumulus convection in large-scale models. J Atmos Sci 48:2313–2335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feng J, Chen W, Li Y (2017) Asymmetry of the winter extra-tropical teleconnections in the Northern Hemisphere associated with two types of ENSO. Clim Dyn 48:2135–2151.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3196-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frauen C, Dommenget D, Tyrrell N, Rezny M, Wales S (2014) Analysis of the nonlinearity of El Niño-Southern Oscillation teleconnection. J Clim 27:6225–6244.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00757.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gates WL (1992) AMIP: the atmospheric model intercomparison project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 73(12):1962–1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graf HF, Zanchettin D (2012) Central Pacific El Niño, the “subtropical bridge”, and Eurasian climate. J Geophys Res 117:D01102.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grandpeix JY, Lafore JP (2010) A density current parameterization coupled with Emanuel’s convection scheme. Part I: the models. J Atmos Sci 67(4):881–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gregory D (2001) Estimation of entrainment rate in simple models of convective clouds. Q J R Meteorol Soc 127:53–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gregory D, Rowntree PR (1990) A mass flux convection scheme with representation of cloud ensemble characteristics and stability-dependent closure. Mon Weather Rev 118(7):1483–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guo Y, Wen Z, Wu R, Lu R, Chen Z (2015) Impact of tropical pacific precipitation anomaly on the East Asian upper-tropospheric westerly jet during the boreal winter. J Clim 28(16):150527124226009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoerger M (2013) ZH: an updated version of Steiger’s Z and web-based calculator for testing the statistical significance of the difference between dependent correlations. http://www.psychmike.com/dependent_correlations.php. Accessed 12 Mar 2018
  19. Honda M, Nakamura H (2001) Interannual seesaw between the Aleutian and Icelandic lows. Part II: its significance in the interannual variability over the wintertime northern hemisphere. J Clim 14:4512–4529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Honda M, Nakamura H, Ukita J, Kousaka I, Takeuchi K (2001) Interannual seesaw between the Aleutian and Icelandic lows. Part I: seasonal dependence and life cycle. J Clim 14:1029–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hung MP, Lin JL, Wang W, Kim D, Shinoda T, Weaver SJ (2013) MJO and convectively coupled equatorial waves simulated by CMIP5 climate models. J Clim 26(17):6185–6214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hurrell JW, Hack JJ, Shea D, Caron JM, Rosinski J (2008) A new sea surface temperature and sea ice boundary dataset for the community atmosphere model. J Clim 21(19):5145–5153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jia X, Wang S, Lin H, Bao Q (2015) A connection between the tropical Pacific Ocean and the winter climate in the Asian-Pacific region. J Geophys Res Atmos 120:430–448.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022324 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jia XJ, Ge JW, Wang S (2016) Diverse impacts of ENSO on wintertime rainfall over the Maritime Continent. Int J Climatol 36:3384–3397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen J, Tnag SK, Hnilo JJ, Fiorino M, Potter GL (2002) NCEP-DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1631–1643.  https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuo HL (1965) On formation and intensification of tropical cyclones through latent heat release by cumulus convection. J Atmos Sci 22(1):40–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lai AWC, Herzog M, Graf HF (2015) Two key parameters for the El Niño continuum: zonal wind anomalies and Western Pacific subsurface potential temperature. Clim Dyn 45(11–12):3461–3480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lau KM, Chan PH (1983a) Short-term climate variability and atmospheric teleconnections from satellite-observed outgoing longwave radiation. Part I: simultaneous relationships. J Atmos Sci 40:2735–2750. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1983)040<2735:STCVAA>2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lau KM, Chan PH (1983b) Short-term climate variability and atmospheric teleconnections from satellite-observed outgoing longwave radiation. Part II: lagged correlations. J Atmos Sci 40:2751–2767. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1983)040<2751:STCVAA>2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lau KM, Wu HT, Bony S (1997) The role of large-scale atmospheric circulation in the relationship between tropical convection and sea surface temperature. J Clim 10(10):381–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee T, McPhaden MJ (2010) Increasing intensity of El Niño in the central-equatorial Pacific. Geophys Res Lett 37:L14603.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044007 Google Scholar
  32. Liebmann B, Smith CA (1996) Description of a complete (interpolated) outgoing longwave radiation dataset. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:1275–1277Google Scholar
  33. Lorenz EN (1956) Empirical orthogonal functions and statistical weather prediction. Science Report 1, Statistical Forecasting Project. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Meteorology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Manabe S, Strickler RF (1964) Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere with a convective adjustment. J Atmos Sci 21(4):361–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mudelsee M (2010) Climate time series analysis. Atmospheric and oceanographic Sciences Library, vol 42. Springer, Switzerland, p 474.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9482-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Neale RB, Richter JH, Jochum M (2008) The impact of convection on ENSO: from a delayed oscillator to a series of events. J Clim 21:5904–5924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nordeng TE (1994) Extended versions of the convective parameterization scheme at ECMWF and their impact on the mean and transient activity of the model in the tropics. ECMWF Tech Memo 206:41Google Scholar
  38. Park JH, An SI (2014) The impact of tropical western Pacific convection on the North Pacific atmospheric circulation during the boreal winter. Clim dyn 43:2227–2238.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-2047-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pascolini-Campbell M, Zanchettin D, Bothe O, Timmreck C, Matei D, Jungclaus H, Graf HF (2015) Toward a record of Central Pacific El Niño events since 1880. Theor Appl Climatol 119(1–2):379–389.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-014-1114-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pinto JG, Reyers M, Ulbrich U (2011) The variable link between PNA and NAO in observations and in multi-century CGCM simulations. Clim Dyn 36(1–2):337–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rayner NA, Parker DE, Horton EB, Folland CK, Alexander LV, Rowell DP, Kent EC, Kaplan A (2003) Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J Geophys Res 108:4407.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002670 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sabeerali CT, Rao SA, Dhakate AR, Salunke K, Goswami BN (2015) Why ensemble mean projection of south Asian monsoon rainfall by CMIP5 models is not reliable? Clim Dyn 45(1–2):161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sabin TP, Babu CA, Joseph PV (2013) SST-convection relation over tropical oceans. Int J Climatol 33:1424–1435.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stechmann SN, Ogrosky HR (2014) The Walker circulation, diabatic heating, and outgoing longwave radiation. Geophys Res Lett 41(24):9097–9105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Steiger JH (1980) Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychol Bull 87:245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Taylor KE (2001) Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. J Geophys Res 106(D7):7183–7192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:485–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tiedtke M (1989) A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models. Mon Weather Rev 117:1779–1800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wallace JM, Gutzler DS (1981) Teleconnections in the geopotential height field during the Northern Hemisphere winter. Mon Weather Rev 109:784–812. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1981)109<0784:TITGHF>2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang C (2002) Atmospheric circulation cells associated with the El Niño-Southern Oscillation. J Clim 15:399–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weng H, Behera SK, Yamagata T (2009) Anomalous winter climate conditions in the Pacific rim during recent El Niño Modoki and El Niño events. Clim Dyn 32:663–674.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0394-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilcox E, Donner L (2007) The frequency of extreme rain events in satellite rain-rate estimates and an atmospheric general circulation model. J Clim 20:53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilks DS (1995) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences: an introduction. Academic press, San Diego, CA, p 467Google Scholar
  54. Wu R, Kirtman BP (2007) Regimes of local air–sea interactions and implications for performance of forced simulations. Clim Dyn 29:393–410.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0246-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yu B, Zhang X, Lin H, Yu JY (2015) Comparison of wintertime North American climate impacts associated with multiple ENSO indices. Atmos Ocean 53:426–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang GJ, McFarlane NA (1995) Sensitivity of climate simulations to the parameterization of cumulus convection in the Canadian Climate Centre general circulation model. Atmos ocean 33(3):407–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zheng J, Liu Q, Wang C, Zheng XT (2013) Impact of heating anomalies associated with rainfall variations over the Indo-western Pacific on Asian atmospheric circulation in winter. Clim Dyn 40:2023–2033.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1478-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Monsoon System Research, Institute of Atmospheric PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of Earth ScienceUniversity of the Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Center for Monsoon and Environment Research, School of Atmospheric SciencesSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations