Whole spine MRI is not required in investigating uncomplicated paediatric lumbosacral lipoma. A retrospective single-institution review
Lumbosacral lipoma (LSL) is a severe occult spinal dysraphism, frequently associated with neurological, urological and orthopaedic complications. Whole spine imaging is typically performed to identify concomitant, but spatially separate, congenital anomalies. Our hypothesis: the incidence of additional, clinically significant abnormalities of the neuraxis is low; thus, imaging should be optimised at the lumbosacral region. We aim to assess the prevalence and relevance of LSL-associated lesions.
A single-centre, retrospective, radiological review using a prospectively maintained operative database. Inclusion criteria: children (< 16 years) with confirmed diagnosis of LSL and received whole spine MRI. Fatty filum, syndromic cases and cutaneous stigmata above lesion level were excluded. Data was extracted from radiological imaging, reports and clinical correspondence.
One hundred twelve patients (40:72, M:F) aged 0.5 years (0.2–2.7) (median ± IQR) with LSL had whole spine MRI between 2001 and 2017. Classification of LSL: transitional 48 (43%); dorsal 30 (27%); caudal 28 (25%) and chaotic 6 (5%). Additional anomalies included syringohydromyelia 44 (39%), subcutaneous tract 19 (17%), abnormal vertebral segmentation 18 (16%), dermoid cyst 1 and 1 Chiari I deformity. There were no Chiari II malformations. No child required surgery for an associated lesion. Binary logistic regression revealed no factors associated with predicting secondary lesions.
In congenital LSL, additional anomalies of the neuraxis are typically loco-regional rather than pan-CNS and additional lesions are rarely clinically significant. The loco-regional distribution of anomalies suggests that only lumbosacral spinal imaging is required in the initial evaluation of LSL. Such a policy would lessen the anaesthetic/sedation time for children and reduce imaging cost per patient. MRI protocols could be refined to optimise imaging quality at the region of interest.
KeywordsLumbosacral lipoma Magnetic resonance imaging Spinal dysraphism Paediatric neurosurgery
Lumbosacral lipoma (LSL) is one of the more severe forms of occult spinal dysraphism and may be associated with neurological, urological and orthopaedic complications [1, 2, 3, 4]. In contrast to the spectrum of open neural tube defects (including myelomeningocoele), the abnormality is typically locoregional rather than pan central nervous system (CNS) . Hydrocephalus and the Chiari II malformation are rarely seen in association with LSL or other occult dysraphic states [6, 7], which is explained by the differing embryological origins of these dysraphic abnormalities [1, 4].
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the definitive post-natal diagnostic modality [1, 2, 3, 8, 9]; however, practice varies with regard to whether whole spine (or, indeed whole neuraxial) MRI or more dedicated lumbosacral spinal imaging is performed . The justification for whole spine MRI is the detection of clinically occult and spatially separate abnormalities in the spine, or intracranially such as the Chiari II malformation and associated hydrocephalus. Whilst the concurrence of different dysraphic anomalies in the same patient is recognised, such cases are rare, and it is debatable whether the detection of asymptomatic, subclinical anomalies will alter surgical management. Whole spine MRI therefore has been traditionally used as a CNS ‘screening tool’. There are logistic and practical implications for whole spine MRI imaging in infancy and childhood including prolonged sedation/anaesthetic and MR scanning time [8, 9]. Furthermore, whole spine imaging often reduces the quality and number of sequences dedicated to lumbosacral region which is important for surgical planning.
To our knowledge, there is no published data from larger cohorts to justify the utility of whole spine MRI over dedicated lumbosacral MRI in the evaluation of LSL. The aims of this study were twofold; firstly, we aimed to perform a single-institution retrospective review of whole spine imaging in cases of LSL to ascertain the incidence of concurrent spinal developmental anomalies; secondly, we assessed the anaesthetic and cost implications of whole spine versus locoregional imaging in this condition.
Retrospective chart and imaging review of patients identified from a prospectively maintained operative database.
The prospectively maintained electronic neurosurgical operative database of Great Ormond Street Hospital, London (GOSH) was used to identify all patients between 2001 and 2017. Only patients with a confirmed diagnosis of LSL and who had whole spine MRI performed and available for review were included. Other dysraphic abnormalities including thickened filum, myelocystocele and split cord malformation were excluded. Further exclusion criteria included children with an underlying syndromic diagnosis, for example Currarino syndrome and VACTERL association (vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheo-esophageal fistula, renal anomalies and limb abnormalities) given their propensity for concomitant congenital anomalies. Specifically, the vertebral segmentation anomalies in VACTERL association may require longer-term follow-up to assess for the risk of kyphoscoliotic abnormalities and were therefore excluded from this cohort. Furthermore cases with additional cutaneous stigmata of spinal dysraphism above the level of the lumbosacral lipoma were also excluded as these findings would mandate whole spine imaging. All available radiological images, neuroradiological reports and clinical correspondence were reviewed. Patient demographic characteristics were recorded including age at scan and sex.
MR imaging was performed using the GOSH Standard Protocol  with a 1.5 T clinical MR system (Gyroscan Intera, Philips Medical System, Best, The Netherlands), and using non-contrast whole spine sagittal and axial T1- and T2-weighted sequences.
Morphological type of LSL was classified according to the Pang classification , which is a modification of the Chapman classification based on x-ray myelography before advent of MRI . Lipomas are classified based on their location and anatomy, distal conus and/or nerve root involvement. Other classifications used include Arai , which is commonly used in Japan . We chose to use the same classification as our previous series , grouping the lipomas into simple (dorsal/caudal) and complex (transitional/chaotic). Simple fatty filum is not included in the lipoma classification.
Review of imaging
Imaging, reports and clinical documentation were reviewed with a paediatric neuroradiologist (FD) to determine the presence of any other abnormalities of the spine or neuraxis on the whole spine MRI. Specifically, we noted the presence of syringohydromyelia, low position of the cerebellar tonsils, occult dysraphisms and vertebral segmentation anomalies. For the purposes of this study, the term syringohydromyelia was used to include intramedullary cavities with MR characteristics of CSF. No attempt was made to further distinguish between hydromyelia and syrngomyelia.
Statistical analysis was performed using binary logistic regression via Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25 (IBM, Armonk, New York, USA).
Total cost of the MRI examinations were calculated using an internal mechanism encompassing calculation of a combination of direct and indirect costs by the GOSH Lead Radiographer (CS). These include a breakdown of pay and associated time to perform tasks associated with these scans. For example: radiographer, radiologist, anaesthetic and nursing costs. In addition, non-pay costs are included including costs for consumables.
Summary of lumbosacral lipoma MRI findings and patient demographics who received whole spine MRI in the initial work-up of lumbosacral lipoma
Total number of lumbosacral lipoma
Age (median ± IQR)
Any additional abnormality
Vertebral segmentation anomaly
MRI findings (Table 1)
In addition to the LSL, the most common additional neuroradiological finding was syringohydromyelia (n = 44, 39%) (Table 1). The majority of the syringohydromyelia were located solely within the lumbar vertebral region (n = 33/44, 75%). Eight patients had syringohydromyelia that bridged from thoracic to lumbar vertebral levels (n = 8/44, 18%), whilst 2 patients had the anomaly spanning from the lumbar to sacral region (n = 2/44, 5%). One patient had two separate syringohydromyelic cavities between vertebral levels T4–8 and L3-S1.
One patient had a Chiari I deformity. Chiari II malformation and associated hydrocephalus were not seen in any of the cases.
None of these abnormalities required additional surgical or medical intervention and did not change the operative approach to the LSL.
Binary logistic regression was performed to ascertain whether demographic factors (age, sex) and lipoma type could predict additional abnormalities identified on the MRI or any specific abnormalities (syringohydromyelia, other dystrophic abnormalities or vertebral segmentation anomalies). All the binary logistic regression models were statistically not significant, and none of these factors were significantly predictive of general or specific additional abnormalities on the MRI whole spine.
Cost benefit assessment
Summary of cost-benefit analysis
Unit cost (£)
Unit Cost + GA (£)
The incidence of LSL is estimated to be ranging 0.3 and 0.6 per 10,000 live births [16, 17]. In spite of this apparent rarity, LSL is one of the more common closed dysraphic states to present to the paediatric neurosurgeon. MRI is the imaging modality of choice for LSL; however, whether it is necessary to image the entire spine (and perhaps brain) in search of associated anomalies remains unclear. This is in contrast to open dysraphic states (myelomeningocele) that are recognised to be pan-CNS disorders with a frequent concurrence of hydrocephalus and Chiari type II malformation .
In our cohort of 112 lumbosacral lipomas, there were no clinically significant additional abnormalities identified beyond the lumbosacral region. Syringohydromyelia was the most common associated finding, with the majority always immediately adjacent to the lumbosacral lipoma and therefore would have been detected if only dedicated lumbosacral spine imaging had been performed. This series demonstrates syringohydromyelia was present in 39% of patients. This is higher than the reported 5–25% in the literature [18, 19, 20, 21]. It is noted that a number of syringohydromyelic cavities were either thoracolumbar (proximal extent would not be identified by the lumbosacral MRI scan) or thoracic (would not be identified at all). In our experience, these are secondary to the lipoma and often resolve following surgical resection of the lipoma; none of those identified in this series required any specific intervention. If such a lesion is identified, we would not recommend scanning further up the spine in the immediate context, and would instead recommend scanning the rest of the spine at follow-up only in the case of persistent or worsening symptoms.
Segmentation anomalies were also present (Fig. 3). The majority of these anomalies were in the lumbosacral region and therefore would have been identified in dedicated regional imaging of the lumbosacral spine. One segmentation anomaly was outside the region of interest but in the absence of deformity would not be considered clinically relevant. In addition, thoracic segmentation anomalies are identifiable on the chest x-ray, which is often performed prior to surgical intervention and this can be used as a screening tool if necessary. The fact that none of these segmentation anomalies altered the surgical management, however, suggests that even this x-ray may not be necessary.
This study in addition confirms that Chiari I and II are not a feature of this condition. There were no detected incidences of Chiari II and one incidence of Chiari I. The incidence of Chiari I has been reported as 1%, which is similar to the incidence in our data set [22, 23, 24] and, importantly, this did not require intervention or change the management of the LSL.
Lastly, performing dedicated locoregional imaging reduces the MR time (20 min vs 40 min) and provides a cost saving of £82.53 (Table 2). The time efficiency enables more patients to be scanned in 1 day and may allow the use of additional sequences such as three-dimensional constructive interference in steady state (CISS) that can be used for better surgical planning in complex cases.
Our data confirms the incidence of secondary lesions associated with uncomplicated LSL may be as high as 51%. However, the majority of associated anomalies are anatomically closely related to the LSL and therefore, would be detected on regional imaging. In the absence of cutaneous stigmata or clinical signs suggesting concomitant dysraphic anomalies, our data suggest that truly occult second lesions are unlikely to be of clinical significance. Therefore, in the initial presentation and work-up of uncomplicated LSL, regional imaging is sufficient and appropriate. This yields the benefit of reduced scanning time and cost savings, in addition to a superior anatomical delineation in a smaller field of view that permits better surgical planning.
The limitations of the present study include its retrospective nature. At our institution, the protocol for MR scanning usually requires children under the age of four to be anaesthetised to reduce movement and artefact. With the median age at scan being 0.5 years, these children would have been anaesthetised and therefore it seems reasonable to ensure the entire spine is imaged for completeness. That being said, telling parents about additional, incidental and not clinically relevant adds anxiety to the clinical context, particularly when the surgical management is not altered. In addition, there are new fast sequences and methods to reduce the use of anaesthesia which will favour the use of a shorter protocol. There remain situations where whole spine MRI is still required including syndromes associated with dysraphism, such as VACTERL, where other spinal anomalies are common; presence of cutaneous stigmata over the upper spine; or neurological symptoms and signs suggestive of a higher lesion.
This study confirms the locoregional nature of complex lumbosacral lipoma and the low incidence of clinically relevant additional spinal lesions. We suggest that MRI dedicated to the lumbosacral spine is sufficient in the evaluation of lumbosacral lipoma. Local MRI permits optimal imaging quality at the region of interest which is essential in the evaluation of surgical anatomy, may reduce the anaesthetic/sedation time for children, the imaging cost per patient and allows addition of extra sequences in the region of interest when necessary.
Aswin Chari is supported by a Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) Children’s Charity Surgeon Scientist Fellowship and the National Institute for Health Research GOSH Biomedical Research Centre.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest to report.
Ethical approval was not required for this retrospective imaging-based study.
Due to the retrospective long-term nature of this study, informed consent was not obtained.
- 11.D’Arco F, D’Amico A, Caranci F, Di Paolo N, Melis D, Brunetti A (2014) Cerebrovascular stenosis in neurofibromatosis type 1 and utility of magnetic resonance angiography: our experience and literature review. Radiol Med 119(6):415–421Google Scholar
- 12.Chapman PH (1982) Congenital intraspinal lipomas: anatomic considerations and surgical treatment. Childs Brain 9(1):3 37–3 47Google Scholar
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.