Advertisement

Quantitative color-coded digital subtraction neuroangiography for pediatric arteriovenous shunting lesions

  • Grace M. Y. MaEmail author
  • Adam A. Dmytriw
  • Premal A. Patel
  • Nicholas Shkumat
  • Timo Krings
  • Manohar M. Shroff
  • Prakash Muthusami
Technical Notes

Abstract

Background

Several complex pediatric neurovascular conditions are amenable to endovascular treatment. Given the unique anatomical and physiological challenges in children, there is an ongoing need for tools and techniques that provide accurate information for treatment planning, while minimizing exposure to ionizing radiation and contrast. This is more so for neonates and infants with high-flow arteriovenous (AV) shunts that are challenging to assess using conventional techniques.

Objective

In this brief report, we describe, through representative cases, the potential role of quantitative color-coded digital subtraction angiography (qDSA) in neuroendovascular procedures in children with high-flow AV shunting lesions.

Methods

Images were obtained using an ArtisQ biplane system (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Post-processing was performed at a dedicated workstation (Syngo, Siemens) using the iFlow module to generate color-coded maps of individual digital subtraction angiography runs.

Conclusion

Color-coded qDSA provides real-time quantitative information in high-flow AV shunting neurovascular lesions. This can potentially help direct treatment choices, optimize endovascular treatment protocols, monitor outcomes, and determine treatment end points.

Keywords

Arteriovenous Quantitative Digital subtraction angiography iFlow Children 

Notes

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Board (REB)

References

  1. 1.
    Cattaneo GFM, Ding A, Jost T, Ley D, Muhl-Bennighaus R, Yilmaz U, Korner H, Reith W, Simgen A (2017) In vitro, contrast agent-based evaluation of the influence of flow diverter size and position on intra-aneurysmal flow dynamics using syngo iFlow. NRJ 59:1275–1283Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chida K, Ohno T, Kakizaki S, Takegawa M, Yuuki H, Nakada M, Takahashi S, Zuguchi M (2010) Radiation dose to the pediatric cardiac catheterization and intervention patient. AJR 195:1175–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ganjoo P (2018) Challenges in paediatric neurosurgery. J Neuroanaesthesiol Crit Care 04:S19–S23Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghibes P, Partovi S, Grozinger G, Martirosian P, Schick F, Nikolaou K, Ketelsen D, Syha R, Grosse U (2018) Reliability and accuracy of peri-interventional stenosis grading in peripheral artery disease using color-coded quantitative fluoroscopy: a phantom study comparing a clinical and scientific postprocessing software. Biomed Res Int 2018:6180138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim S, Yoshizumi TT, Frush DP, Toncheva G, Yin FF (2010) Radiation dose from cone beam CT in a pediatric phantom: risk estimation of cancer incidence. AJR 194:186–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kondapavulur S, Cooke DL, Kao A, Amans MR, Alexander M, Darflinger R, Dowd CF, Higashida RT, Damato B, Halbach VV, Matthay KK, Hetts SW (2018) Estimation of intra-arterial chemotherapy distribution to the retina in pediatric retinoblastoma patients using quantitative digital subtraction angiography. Interv Neuroradiol 24:214–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Orbach DB, Stamoulis C, Strauss KJ, Manchester J, Smith ER, Scott RM, Lin N (2014) Neurointerventions in children: radiation exposure and its import. AJNR 35:650–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shakur SF, Brunozzi D, Hussein AE, Linninger A, Hsu CY, Charbel FT, Alaraj A (2018) Validation of cerebral arteriovenous malformation hemodynamics assessed by DSA using quantitative magnetic resonance angiography: preliminary study. J Neurointerv Surg 10:156–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shkumat NA, Shroff MM, Muthusami P (2018) Radiation dosimetry of 3D rotational neuroangiography and 2D-DSA in children. AJNR 39:727–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thierry-Chef I, Simon SL, Miller DL (2006) Radiation dose and cancer risk among pediatric patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology procedures. Pediatr Radiol 36(Suppl 2):159–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Image Guided Therapy, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Hospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Division of Neuroradiology, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto Western HospitalUniversity Health Network, University of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS)University College LondonLondonUK
  4. 4.Radiology DepartmentGreat Ormond Street Hospital for ChildrenLondonUK

Personalised recommendations