The unseen third dimension: a novel approach for assessing head shape severity in infants with isolated sagittal synostosis
This study aimed to develop a novel approach to assess the severity of skull dysmorphology in infants with isolated sagittal synostosis (ISS) and its relationship with the surgical results.
We divided 66 infants with ISS into three groups by combining the scaphocephalic (SSI-A) and platycephalic (VLI) indices as descriptors of the relation between length, width, and height. We evaluated each skull for morphology as hyperdolichocephalic (< 66%) versus dolichocephalic (66–77%) and as hyperplatycephalic (< 78%) versus platycephalic skull (78–85%). A score system was developed as follows: 2 points for values < 66% and < 78% and 1 point for values between 66 and 77% and 78 and 85% in SSI-A and VLI, respectively. The overall score was calculated and it was used to classify our patients on a 4-point ordinal scale, according to the severity of head shape (2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe).
Thirty-two infants resulted in mild group, 17 in moderate group, and 17 in severe group. SSI-A and VLI were reduced according to the severity of ISS. We demonstrated a positive correlation between SSA-A and VLI in mild subgroup of patients while we found a negative correlation between SSA-A and VLI in moderate and in severe subgroups. Moreover, a positive correlation was found between severe subgroup and Sloan III class of surgical results.
This study describes a simple tool to better classify infants with ISS, considering the three-dimensional morphology of the skull, because it evaluates both the dolichocephalic and platycephalic component.
KeywordsIsolated sagittal synostosis Scaphocephalic index Platycephalic index Computer tomography Skull morphology
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Rosalinda Calandrelli declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Fabio Pilato declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Luca Massimi declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Marco Panfili declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Concezio Di Rocco declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Cesare Colosimo declares that he is scientific consultant for Bracco Diagnostics Inc. and Bayer HealthCare.
Research involving human participants
Ethical approval: We declare that all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 4.Fearon JA, McLaughlin EB, Kolar JC (2006) Sagittal craniosynostosis: surgical outcomes and long-term growth. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(2):532–541. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000200774.31311.09 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Schmelzer RE, Perlyn CA, Kane AA, Pilgram TK, Govier D, Marsh JL (2007) Identifying reproducible patterns of calvarial dysmorphology in nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis may affect operative intervention and outcomes assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(5):1546–1552. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000256067.42651.30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Heller JB, Heller MM, Knoll B, Gabbay JS, Duncan C, Persing JA (2008) Intracranial volume and cephalic index outcomes for total calvarial reconstruction among nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(1):187–195. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000293762.71115.c5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Haas LL (1952) Roentgenological skull measurements and their diagnostic applications. Am J Roentgenol Radium Therapy, Nucl Med 67(2):197–209Google Scholar
- 17.Dvoracek LA, Skolnick GB, Nguyen DC, Naidoo SD, Smyth MD, Woo AS, Patel KB (2015) Comparison of traditional versus normative cephalic index in patients with sagittal synostosis: measure of scaphocephaly and postoperative outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(3):541–548. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar