Shifting epidemiology of single-suture craniosynostosis and the need for a more granular ICD classification system: a national survey of members from the American Society of Pediatric Neurosurgeons (ASPN) and the American Society of Craniofacial Surgeons (ASCFS)
- 52 Downloads
The purpose of our letter is to bring attention to the national epidemiological studies who reported an increase in the incidence of metopic craniosynostosis and to raise awareness about the importance of developing improved International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes for craniosynostosis [1, 2, 3]. Reports of epidemiological shifts in single-suture synostosis are not limited to the USA. In the last decade, epidemiological studies across Europe have also reported a similar increase in the incidence of metopic craniosynostosis. A study done in France by DiRocco et al. revealed almost a 4-fold increase in metopic craniosynostosis, compared with a 1.7-fold increase in sagittal craniosynostosis . A nine-year study using data from centers throughout Europe found a statistically significant increase in the incidence of metopic cases in both absolute numbers and in comparison with other craniosynostosis subtypes . As a means to provide an insight into the views of...
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Di Rocco F, Arnaud E, Meyer P, Sainte-Rose C, Renier D (2009) Focus session on the changing “epidemiology” of craniosynostosis (comparing two quinquennia: 1985–1989 and 2003–2007) and its impact on the daily clinical practice: a review from Necker Enfants Malades. Childs Nerv Syst 25(7):807–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-009-0864-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.van der Meulen J, van der Hulst R, van Adrichem L, Arnaud E, Chin-Shong D, Duncan C, Habets E, Hinojosa J, Mathijssen I, May P, Morritt D, Nishikawa H, Noons P, Richardson D, Wall S, van der Vlugt J, Renier D (2009) The increase of metopic synostosis: a pan-European observation. J Craniofac Surg 20(2):283–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar