Child's Nervous System

, Volume 35, Issue 5, pp 801–805 | Cite as

The benefit of surveillance imaging for paediatric cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma

  • Ellen McAuleyEmail author
  • Hannah Brophy
  • James Hayden
  • Benedetta Pettorini
  • Chris Parks
  • Shivaram Avula
  • Conor Mallucci
  • Barry Pizer
Original Article



Paediatric cerebellar pilocytic astrocytomas (PA) (WHO grade 1) are amongst the most common of childhood brain tumours and are generally amenable to resection, with surgery alone being curative in the majority of cases. There is, however, a lack of consensus regarding the frequency and duration of post-treatment MRI surveillance for these tumours. This is important, as follow-up imaging is a significant use of resources and often associated with patient and family anxiety. We have assessed the utility of MRI surveillance in the detection of cerebellar PA recurrence at our regional paediatric neurosurgical centre.

Materials and methods

The tumour register at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital was searched to identify all patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2017, with a confirmed histopathological diagnosis of cerebellar PA. Patient demographics, surgical outcome, number of MRI scans and length of follow-up were recorded for each patient.


Forty patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at diagnosis was 7.8 years (range 2 to 17 years). Complete surgical resection (CR), confirmed by post-operative MRI, was achieved in 36 of the 40 patients, including all 31 cases from 2009 and later for which intraoperative MRI (iMRI) was utilised. There was one case of recurrence after CR (at 2.2 years) out of the 36 cases, whereas all 4 patients with initial partial resections had progressive growth of their tumours and required second surgical interventions.


This series confirms the very low likelihood of recurrence for completely resected cerebellar PAs and suggests that in such cases the duration and frequency of surveillance imaging could be limited to a maximum of 2.5 to 3 years of follow-up imaging. This report also indicates improved complete resection rates over time, probably associated with technical advances including the routine in-house use of iMRI in 2009.


Pilocytic astrocytomas Surveillance imaging Tumours 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Sievert AJ, Fisher MJ (2009) Pediatric low-grade gliomas. J Child Neurol 24:1397–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sievert AJ, Lang S-S, Boucher KL, Madsen PJ, Slaunwhite E, Choudhari N, Kellet M, Storm PB, Resnick AC (2013) Paradoxical activation and RAF inhibitor resistance of BRAF protein kinase fusions characterizing pediatric astrocytomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:5957–5962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gajjar A, Sanford RA, Heideman R, Jenkins JJ, Walter A, Li Y, Langston JW, Muhlbauer M, Boyett JM, Kun LE (1997) Low-grade astrocytoma: a decade of experience at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. J Clin Oncol 15:2792–2799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fisher BJ, Leighton CC, Vujovic O, Macdonald DR, Stitt L (2001) Results of a policy of surveillance alone after surgical management of pediatric low grade gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51:704–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fisher PG, Tihan T, Goldthwaite PT, Wharam MD, Carson BS, Weingart JD, Repka MX, Cohen KJ, Burger PC (2008) Outcome analysis of childhood low-grade astrocytomas. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51:245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shaw EG, Wishoff JH (2003) Prospective clinical trials of intracranial low-grade glioma in adults and children. Neuro-Oncology 5(3):153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wisoff JH, Sanford RA, Heier LA, Sposto R, Burger PC, Yates AJ, Holmes EJ, Kun LE (2011) Primary neurosurgery for pediatric low-grade gliomas: a prospective multi-institutional study from the Children’s Oncology Group. Neurosurgery 68(6):1548–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sutton LN, Cnaan A, Klatt L, Zhao H, Zimmerman R, Needle M, Molloy P, Phillips P (1996) Postoperative surveillance imaging in children with cerebellar astrocytomas. J Neurosurg 84:721–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Steinbok P, Hentschel S, Cochrane DD, Kestle JRW (1996) Value of postoperative surveillance imaging in the management of children with some common brain tumors. J Neurosurg 84:726–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alford R, Gargan L, Bowers DC, Klesse LJ, Weprin B, Koral K (2016) Postoperative surveillance of pediatric cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma. J Neuro-Oncol 130:149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stevens SP, Main C, Bailey S, Pizer B, English M, Phillips R, Peet A, Avula S, Wilne S, Wheatley K, Kearns PR, Wilson JS (2018) The utility of routine surveillance screening with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect tumour recurrence/progression in children with low grade central nervous system (CNS) tumours: a systematic review. J Neuro-Oncol 139:507–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dorward IG, Luo J, Perry A, Gutmann DH, Mansur DB, Rubin JB, Leonard JR (2010) Postoperative imaging surveillance in pediatric pilocytic astrocytomas. J Neurosurg Pediatr 6:346–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vassilyadi M, Shamji MF, Tataryn Z, Keene D, Ventureyra E (2009) Postoperative surveillance magnetic resonance imaging for cerebellar astrocytoma. Can J Neurol Sci 36:707–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Udaka YT, Yeh-Nayre LA, Amene CS, VandenBerg S, Levy ML, Crawford JR (2013) Recurrent pediatric central nervous system low-grade gliomas: the role of surveillance neuroimaging in asymptomatic children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ogiwara H, Bowman RM, Tomita T (2012) Long-term follow-up of pediatric benign cerebellar astrocytomas. Neurosurgery 70:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saunders DDE, Phipps KPK, Wade AM, Hayward RD (2005) Surveillance imaging strategies following surgery and/or radiotherapy for childhood cerebellar low-grade astrocytoma. J Neurosurg 102:172–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Paediatric OncologyAlder Hey Children’s HospitalLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Department of Paediatric NeurosurgeryAlder Hey Children’s HospitalLiverpoolUK
  3. 3.Department of Paediatric RadiologyAlder Hey Children’s HospitalLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations