Use of computed tomography and diffusion weighted imaging in children with ventricular shunt
To evaluate the indications, number, and imaging results of brain computed tomography (CT) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in children with ventriculoperitoneal shunt, to estimate the radiation dose, and to evaluate the effectiveness of DWI.
This retrospectively study included 54 consecutive patients (boys/girls = 30/24, mean age, 3 ± 4.1 years) with shunt that were placed due to congenital abnormalities-hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy between January 2015 and March 2018. The presence of shunt-related complications (SRC) was assessed using clinical and neuroimaging findings, and the standard reference was accepted as the shunt revision. Size comparisons of ventricles were performed using Evans index and the frontal and occipital horn ratio, and each measurement made by the observers were compared using Bland-Altman analysis. A kappa coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated to assess the agreement between observers.
The mean number of hospital admission, number of CT scans, and DWI were 5.8, 4.8, and 1.1, respectively per patient. A significant linear correlation was observed between hospital admission and CT scans (r = 0.288, p = 0.035). The number of CT scans and the cumulative effective dose per patient were higher in patients with SRC than in those without (p < 0.001). The mortality rate due to radiation-induced neoplasia has increased by 0.33% in the study period. The inter-observer agreement was perfect or substantial for the catheter visualization, assessment of the ventricular system on DWI, and for the image quality of DWI between observers (κ = 0.704–1, p ≤ 0.001). No significant difference was found between CT and DWI in the measurements of Evans index and the frontal and occipital horn ratio (p > 0.05). Inter-observer agreements between observers were almost perfect for the Evans index and the frontal and occipital horn ratio (ICC = 0.94–0.99, p < 0.001).
An awareness of the use of CT in children is still inadequate and difficulties in the diagnosis of SRC probably cause the overuse of CT. DWI should be preferred in the diagnosis of SRC and the follow-up of patients. Otherwise, the increase in the prevalence of several diseases, particularly neoplasia, may be inevitable because of the over use of CT.
KeywordsVentriculoperitoneal shunt Radiation dose Diffusion weighted imaging
No funding was received for this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Statement of informed consent was not applicable since the manuscript does not contain any patient data.
- 1.Carey CM, Tullous MW, Walker ML (1994) Hydrocephalus: etiology, pathologic effects, diagnosis, and natural history. In: Cheek WR, Marlin AE, McLone DG, Reigel DH, Walker ML (eds) Pediatric neurosurgery surgery of the developing nervous system, 3rd edn. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia, pp 185–201Google Scholar
- 9.Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A, Greenlee RT, Weinmann S, Solberg LI, Feigelson HS, Roblin D, Flynn MJ, Vanneman N, Smith-Bindman R (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 167:700–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Koral K, Blackburn T, Bailey A, Koral KM, Anderson J (2012) Strengthening the argument for rapid brain MR imaging: estimation of reduction in lifetime attributable risk of developing fatal cancer in children with shunted hydrocephalus by instituting a rapid brain MR imaging protocol in lieu of head CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:1851–1854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Turhan T, Ersahin Y, Dinc M, Mutluer S (2011) Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure. Turk Neurosurg 21:66–73Google Scholar
- 26.Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J, Butler PF, Callahan MJ, Coley BD, Farley S, Frush DP, Hernanz-Schulman M, Jaramillo D, Johnson ND, Kaste SC, Morrison G, Strauss KJ, Tuggle N (2008) The image gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:273–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: UNSCEAR 2013 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. UNSCEAR; ViennaGoogle Scholar
- 31.National Research Council (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2: National Academies PressGoogle Scholar
- 32.Iskandar BJ, Sansone JM, Medow J, Rowley HA (2004) The use of quick-brain magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of shunt-treated hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 101:147–151Google Scholar