Long-term follow-up of myelomeningocele defect closure with dorsal intercostal artery perforator propeller flaps
- 33 Downloads
Closure of the skin defect in myelomeningocele repair determines the quality of the surgical result. In large myelomeningoceles, the direct closure or by skin undermining may not be possible. In these cases, the skin defect must be closed using flaps to provide a tension-free and successful closure.
In this procedure, after neurosurgical repair and closure of the placode, the defect surgically becomes an ovoid in shape. Then, this defect is closed by transposition of two dorsal intercostal artery perforator propeller flaps. The defect size was > 5 cm in diameter. The localization of the lesion was lumbosacral.
A successful tension-free one-stage closure was obtained, without necrosis. Healing was uneventful without any complications and the coverage remained stable over 9 years with the child growth.
The dorsal intercostal artery perforator propeller flap enables the surgeon to achieve a tension-free defect closure of considerably large myelomeningocele defects. This type of closure provides a durable coverage and a soft tissue padding over the neural tissues that persist with the child growth. The dorsal intercostal artery perforator propeller flap seems to be a useful closure of large myelomeningocele defects.
KeywordsMyelomeningocele Propeller flap Dorsal intercostal artery flap
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products, devices or drugs mentioned in this article.
- 1.Reigel DH (1996) Myelomeningocele. In: Cheek WR (ed) Atlas of pediatric neurosurgery, 1st edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 1e9Google Scholar
- 4.Mutaf M, Sunay M, Bulut Ö (2008) The “reading man” procedure a new technique for the closure of circular skin defects. Ann Plast Surg 60:420e5Google Scholar
- 8.McCraw JB, Penix JO, Freeman BG et al (1987) Soft-tissue repair of myelomeningocele defects using bilateral latissimus dorsi and trapezius musculocutaneous flaps. Ann Plast Surg 18:147e55Google Scholar
- 9.Sarifakioglu N, Bingul F, Terzioglu A et al (2003) Bilateral split latissimus dorsi V-Y flaps for closure of large thoracolumbar meningomyelocele defects. Br J Plast Surg 56:303e6Google Scholar
- 10.Isik D, Tekes L, Eseoglu M, Isik Y, Bilici S, Atik B (2011) Closure of large myelomeningocele defects using dorsal intercostal artery perforator flap. Ann Plast Surg 67(2):159-163Google Scholar
- 11.Duffy FJ Jr, Weprin BE, Swift DM (2004) A new approach to closure of large lumbosacral myelomeningoceles: the superior gluteal artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 53:305e10Google Scholar
- 12.Mangels KJ, Tulipan N, Bruner JP et al (2000) Use of bipedicular advancement flaps for intrauterine closure of myeloschisis. Pediatr Neurosurg 32:52e6Google Scholar