Short-term influence of biochar and fertilizer-biochar blends on soil nutrients, fauna and maize growth
- 78 Downloads
Use of inorganic fertilizers in smallholder cropping systems in Africa is often becoming inefficient due to increasing unresponsiveness to fertilizer application. A study was conducted for 2 years (four seasons) to assess the effects of biochar made from Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC. biomass on nutrients, fauna abundance and subsequent influence on maize planted in a nitisol. There were 12 amendments comprising: (i) biochar applied alone at a rate of 5 and 10 Mg ha−1; (ii) three fertilizer types applied separately (di-ammonium phosphate (18:46:0), urea (46:0:0) and composite NPK (23:23:0)); (iii) six fertilizer + biochar blends of the three fertilizer types and two biochar rates (0.05 and 0.1 Mg ha−1); and (iv) a control with no inputs. Treatments were replicated four times in a randomized complete block design. The amendments were applied in the first two seasons, while the last two were used to assess residual effects. At the end of the first two seasons, total C and N were higher in soils where biochar or fertilizer + biochar was applied, with more than 15.0 g C and 1.9 g N kg−1, compared to 10.4 g C and 1.0 g N kg−1 in control plots. Available P and exchangeable K were over 200% and 100% higher in biochar or fertilizer + biochar amended than control soils, respectively. Application of biochar had no effects on macrofauna such as beetles, centipedes, millipedes, termites and ants, but attracted earthworms. Soil that received 10 Mg biochar ha−1 recorded twice the number of earthworms (207 individuals m−2) compared to soil with 5 Mg biochar ha−1 (105 individuals m−2) and control (97 individuals m−2). Soils which received biochar, with or without fertilizer, had higher taxonomic richness (7.0 species) compared to soils which received DAP (2.8) or NPK (3.8). Nematodes, particularly bacterivorous groups, decreased by more than eight times with biochar application. In the first and second seasons, 5.6 Mg maize grain yield ha−1 was obtained from plots amended with biochar (without fertilizer), which was about six times higher than that harvested from unfertilised control at 0.9 Mg ha−1. Yield differences in plots where fertilizer was applied with or without biochar were not significant. Yield in the third and fourth seasons declined to 3.2 and 1.5 Mg ha−1, irrespective of fertilizer type or biochar amounts.
KeywordsBiochar Fertilizer + biochar blends Soil macrofauna Soil nematodes Maize yield
This work was supported financially by MEA Ltd. Staff time for the first author was supported by the Fondation des Fondateurs, Biochar for Sustainable Soils (B4SS) (ST2F-1166), a Global Environment Facility (GEF) funded project. We wish to thank Andrew Thuo for his assistance in nematode identification, John Kimotho for soil analyses and Dr. Harun Gitari for proofreading this manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Anderson JM, Ingram JSI (1993) Tropical soil biology and fertility: a handbook of methods. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
- Bationo A (2008) Integrated soil fertility management options for agricultural intensification in the Sudano-Sahelian zone of West Africa. Academy of Science Publishers, NairobiGoogle Scholar
- Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2008) Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Aust J Soil Residues 46:437–444Google Scholar
- Chen JH, Sun X, Zheng JF, Zhang XH, Liu XY, Bian RJ, Li LQ, Cheng K, Zheng JW, Pan GX (2018) Biochar amendment changes temperature sensitivity of soil respiration and composition of microbial communities 3 years after in-corporation in an organic carbon-poor dry cropland soil. Biol Fertil Soils 54:175–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Groote H (2002) Maize yield losses from stem borers in Kenya. Insect Sci Appl 22:89–96Google Scholar
- Forge TA, Kimpinski J (2007) Nematodes. In: Gregorich EG, Carter MR (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 415–425Google Scholar
- Hagemann N, Joseph S, Schmidt HP, Kammann CI, Harter J, Borch T, Young RB, Varga K, Taherymoosavi S, Elliott KW, McKenna A, Albu M, Mayrhofer C, Obst M, Conte P, Dieguez-Alonso A, Orsetti S, Subdiaga E, Behrens S, Kappler A (2017) Organic coating on biochar explains its nutrient retention and stimulation of soil fertility. Nat Commun 8:1089. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01123-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ippolito JA, Spokas KA, Novak JM, Lentz RD, Cantrell KB (2015) Biochar elemental composition and factors influencing nutrient retention. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York, pp 139–163Google Scholar
- Isaac RA, Johnson WC Jr (1998) Elemental determination by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry. In: Kalra YP (ed) Handbook of reference methods for plant analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 165–170Google Scholar
- Jaetzold R, Schemidt H, Hornetz B, Shisanya C (2006) Farm management handbook of Kenya, vol II/B2. Ministry of Agriculture. Kenya and German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ), NairobiGoogle Scholar
- Mbau SK (2012) Evaluating quality of composts made from organic agro-wastes and their influence on maize yield and soil fauna in Western Kenya. MSc. Thesis. University of NairobiGoogle Scholar
- Miller RO (1998) Microwave digestion of plant tissue in a closed vessel. In: Kalra YP (ed) Handbook of reference methods for plant analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 69–73Google Scholar
- R-Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Verheijen F, Jeffery SL, Bastos AC, van der Velde M, Diafas I (2010) Biochar application to soils: a critical scientific review of effects on soil properties, processes and functions. European Commission, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
- Wakie T, Evangelista P, Laituri M (2012) Utilization assessment of Prosopis juliflora in Afar region, Ethiopia. Pastoral Livelihoods Initiative II Project (PLI II), US Forest Service, USDA Office of International Programs, USAID. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307560598. Accessed 28 June 2019
- Wang K-H, McSorley R (2005) Effects of soil ecosystem management on nematode pests, nutrient cycling, and plant health. APSnet Features. https://doi.org/10.1094/APSnetFeatures/2005-0105; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255671573. Accessed 05 Sept 2018