Advertisement

Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 54, Issue 8, pp 999–1012 | Cite as

Chemical nature of soil organic carbon under different long-term fertilization regimes is coupled with changes in the bacterial community composition in a Calcaric Fluvisol

  • Dandan Li
  • Lin Chen
  • Jisheng Xu
  • Lei Ma
  • Dan C. Olk
  • Bingzi Zhao
  • Jiabao Zhang
  • Xiuli Xin
Original Paper
  • 219 Downloads

Abstract

Fertilization is an important factor influencing the chemical structure of soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil microbial communities; however, whether any connection exists between the two under different fertilization regimes remains unclear. Soils from a 27-year field experiment were used to explore potential associations between SOC functional groups and specific bacterial taxa, using quantitative multiple cross-polarization magic-angle spinning 13C nuclear magnetic resonance and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Treatments included balanced fertilization with organic materials (OM) and with nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) mineral fertilizers (NPK); unbalanced fertilization without one of the major elements (NP, PK, or NK); and an unamended control. These treatments were divided into four distinct groups, namely OM, NPK, NP plus PK, and NK plus control, according to their bacterial community composition and SOC chemical structure. Soil total P, available P, and SOC contents were the major determinants of bacterial community composition after long-term fertilization. Compared to NPK, the OM treatment generated a higher aromatic C–O and OCH3 and lower alkyl C and OCH abundance, which were associated with the enhanced abundance of members of the Acidobacteria subgroups 6 and 5, Cytophagaceae, Chitinophagaceae, and Bacillus sp.; NP plus PK treatments resulted in a higher OCH and lower aromatic C–C abundance, which showed a close association with the enrichment of unclassified Chloracidobacteria, Syntrophobacteraceae, and Anaerolineae and depletion of Bacillales; and NK plus control treatments resulted in a higher abundance of aromatic C–C, which was associated with the enhanced abundance of Bacillales. Our results indicate that different fertilization regimes changed the SOC chemical structure and bacterial community composition in different patterns. The results also suggest that fertilization-induced variations in SOC chemical structure were strongly associated with shifts in specific microbial taxa which, in turn, may be affected by changes in soil properties.

Keywords

13C-NMR 16S rRNA gene Long-term balanced/unbalanced fertilization SOC functional group Bacterial community composition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank editor-in-chief Prof. Nannipieri and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions that improved the manuscript greatly.

Funding

Funding for the work was provided by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFD0300802, 2016YFD0200107), the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-03), and the Science and Technology Service Network Initiative (KFJ-SW-STS-142-03).

Supplementary material

374_2018_1319_MOESM1_ESM.doc (921 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 921 kb)
374_2018_1319_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (195 kb)
ESM 2 (XLSX 194 kb)

References

  1. Accoe F, Boeckx P, Van Cleemput O, Hofman G, Hui X, Bin H, Chen GX (2002) Characterization of soil organic matter fractions from grassland and cultivated soils via C content and δ13C signature. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 16:2157–2164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amend AS, Seifert KA, Bruns TD (2010) Quantifying microbial communities with 454 pyrosequencing: does read abundance count? Mol Ecol 19:5555–5565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asano M, Wagai R (2015) Distinctive organic matter pools among particle-size fractions detected by solid-state 13C-NMR, δ13C and δ15N analyses only after strong dispersion in an allophanic Andisol. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 61:242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldock JA, Oades JM, Waters AG, Peng X, Vassallo AM, Wilson MA (1992) Aspects of the chemical structure of soil organic materials as revealed by solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy. Biogeochemistry 16:1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balesdent J, Mariotti A, Guillet B (1987) Natural 13C abundance as a tracer for studies of soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Biol Biochem 19:25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banerjee S, Kirkby CA, Schmutter D, Bissett A, Kirkegaard JA, Richardson AE (2016) Network analysis reveals functional redundancy and keystone taxa amongst bacterial and fungal communities during organic matter decomposition in an arable soil. Soil Biol Biochem 97:188–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barros Soares EM, Silva IR, de Novais RF, Hu Y-Y, Schmidt-Rohr K (2013) Alterations in molecular composition of humic substances from eucalypt plantation soils assessed by 13C-NMR spectroscopy. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:293–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y (2008) Mechanisms of real and apparent priming effects and their dependence on soil microbial biomass and community structure: critical review. Biol Fertil Soils 45:115–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bot A, Benites J (2005) The importance of soil organic matter: key to drought-resistant soil and sustained food and production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp 1–75Google Scholar
  10. Bryant DA, Costas AMG, Maresca JA, Chew AGM, Klatt CG, Bateson MM, Tallon LJ, Hostetler J, Nelson WC, Heidelberg JF, Ward DM (2007) Candidatus Chloracidobacterium thermophilum: an aerobic phototrophic acidobacterium. Science 317:523–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cao XY, Lattao C, Pignatello JJ, Mao JD, Schmidt-Rohr K (2014) Sorption selectivity in natural organic matter probed with fully deuterium-exchanged and carbonyl-13C-labeled benzophenone and 1H-13C NMR spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol 48:8645–8652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Pena AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Tumbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke KR (1993) Nonparametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Core Team R (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  15. Cruz AF, Hamel C, Hanson K, Selles F, Zentner RP (2009) Thirty-seven years of soil nitrogen and phosphorus fertility management shapes the structure and function of the soil microbial community in a Brown Chernozem. Plant Soil 315:173–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cucurachi M, Busconi M, Marudelli M, Soffritti G, Fogher C (2013) Direct amplification of new cellulase genes from woodland soil purified DNA. Mol Biol Rep 40:4317–4325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Das SN, Sarma PVSRN, Neeraja C, Malati N, Podile AR (2010) Members of Gammaproteobacteria and Bacilli represent the culturable diversity of chitinolytic bacteria in chitin-enriched soils. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 26:1875–1881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De la Cruz-Barron M, Cruz-Mendoza A, Navarro-Noya YE, Ruiz-Valdiviezo VM, Ortiz-Gutierrez D, Ramirez-Villanueva DA, Luna-Guido M, Thierfelder C, Wall PC, Verhulst N, Govaerts B, Dendooven L (2017) The bacterial community structure and dynamics of carbon and nitrogen when maize (Zea mays L.) and its neutral detergent fibre were added to soil from Zimbabwe with contrasting management practices. Microb Ecol 73:135–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De’ath G (2006) mvpart: multivariate partitioning. R package version 1.26. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/
  20. Demoling F, Figueroa D, Bååth E (2007) Comparison of factors limiting bacterial growth in different soils. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2485–2495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ding JL, Jiang X, Ma MC, Zhou BK, Guan DW, Zhao BS, Zhou J, Cao FM, Li L, Li J (2016) Effect of 35 years inorganic fertilizer and manure amendment on structure of bacterial and archaeal communities in black soil of Northeast China. Appl Soil Ecol 105:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dixon P (2003) VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J Veg Sci 14:927–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eo J, Park KC (2016) Long-term effects of imbalanced fertilization on the composition and diversity of soil bacterial community. Agric Ecosyst Environ 231:176–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eshetu B, Jandl G, Leinweber P (2012) Compost changed soil organic matter molecular composition: a Py-GC/MS and Py-FIMS study. Compost Sci Util 20:230–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Estendorfer J, Stempfhuber B, Haury P, Vestergaard G, Rillig MC, Joshi J, Schroeder P, Schloter M (2017) The influence of land use intensity on the plant-associated microbiome of Dactylis glomerata L. Front Plant Sci 8:930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fang XW, Chua T, Schmidt-Rohr K, Thompson ML (2010) Quantitative 13C NMR of whole and fractionated Iowa Mollisols for assessment of organic matter composition. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74:584–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB (2007) Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88:1354–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fontaine S, Mariotti A, Abbadie L (2003) The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? Soil Biol Biochem 35:837–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Francioli D, Schulz E, Lentendu G, Wubet T, Buscot F, Reitz T (2016) Mineral vs. organic amendments: microbial community structure, activity and abundance of agriculturally relevant microbes are driven by long-term fertilization strategies. Front Microbiol 7:1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frostegård Å, Tunlid A, Bååth E (1993) Phospholipid fatty acid composition, biomass, and activity of microbial communities from two soil types experimentally exposed to different heavy metals. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3605–3617PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Goldfarb KC, Karaoz U, Hanson CA, Santee CA, Bradford MA, Treseder KK, Wallenstein MD, Brodie EL (2011) Differential growth responses of soil bacterial taxa to carbon substrates of varying chemical recalcitrance. Front Microbiol 2:94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gressel N, McColl JG, Preston CM, Newman RH, Powers RF (1996) Linkages between phosphorus transformations and carbon decomposition in a forest soil. Biogeochemistry 33:97–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jackson ML (1958) Soil chemical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  34. Jiménez-González MA, Álvarez AM, Hernández Z, Almendros G (2018) Soil carbon storage predicted from the diversity of pyrolytic alkanes. Biol Fertil Soils 54:617–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jing ZW, Chen RR, Wei SP, Feng YZ, Zhang JB, Lin XG (2017) Response and feedback of C mineralization to P availability driven by soil microorganisms. Soil Biol Biochem 105:111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kiem R, Knicker H, Korschens M, Kögel-Knabner I (2000) Refractory organic carbon in C-depleted arable soils, as studied by 13C NMR spectroscopy and carbohydrate analysis. Org Geochem 31:655–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kivlin SN, Winston GC, Goulden ML, Treseder KK (2014) Environmental filtering affects soil fungal community composition more than dispersal limitation at regional scales. Fungal Ecol 12:14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kögel-Knabner I (2002) The macromolecular organic composition of plant and microbial residues as inputs to soil organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 34:139–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li ZQ, Zhao BZ, Wang QY, Cao XY, Zhang JB (2015) Differences in chemical composition of soil organic carbon resulting from long-term fertilization strategies. PLoS One 10:e0124359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li F, Chen L, Zhang JB, Yin J, Huang SM (2017) Bacterial community structure after long-term organic and inorganic fertilization reveals important associations between soil nutrients and specific taxa involved in nutrient transformations. Front Microbiol 8:187PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Lian TX, Wang GH, Yu ZH, Li YS, Liu XB, Zhang SQ, Herbert SJ, Jin J (2017) Bacterial communities incorporating plant-derived carbon in the soybean rhizosphere in Mollisols that differ in soil organic carbon content. Appl Soil Ecol 119:375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu J, Sui Y, Yu Z, Shi Y, Chu H, Jin J, Liu X, Wang G (2014) High throughput sequencing analysis of biogeographical distribution of bacterial communities in the black soils of Northeast China. Soil Biol Biochem 70:113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liu LL, Kong JJ, Cui HL, Zhang JB, Wang FH, Cai ZC, Huang XQ (2016) Relationships of decomposability and C/N ratio in different types of organic matter with suppression of Fusarium oxysporum and microbial communities during reductive soil disinfestation. Biol Control 101:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Louca S, Jacques SMS, Pires APF, Leal JS, Gonzalez AL, Doebeli M, Farjalla VF (2017) Functional structure of the bromeliad tank microbiome is strongly shaped by local geochemical conditions. Environ Microbiol 19:3132–3151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mao JD, Schmidt-Rohr K (2004) Accurate quantification of aromaticity and nonprotonated aromatic carbon fraction in natural organic matter by 13C solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance. Environ Sci Technol 38:2680–2684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miltner A, Bombach P, Schmidt-Brücken B, Kästner M (2012) SOM genesis: microbial biomass as a significant source. Biogeochemistry 111:41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nannipieri P, Ascher J, Ceccherini MT, Landi L, Pietramellara G, Renella G (2003) Microbial diversity and soil functions. Eur J Soil Sci 54:655–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ng EL, Patti AF, Rose MT, Schefe CR, Wilkinson K, Smernik RJ, Cavagnaro TR (2014) Does the chemical nature of soil carbon drive the structure and functioning of soil microbial communities? Soil Biol Biochem 70:54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  50. Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (1982) Methods of soil analysis, part 2, chemical and microbiological properties. Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  51. Pascault N, Ranjard L, Kaisermann A, Bachar D, Christen R, Terrat S, Mathieu O, Leveque J, Mougel C, Henault C, Lemanceau P, Pean M, Boiry S, Fontaine S, Maron PA (2013) Stimulation of different functional groups of bacteria by various plant residues as a driver of soil priming effect. Ecosystems 16:810–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pathma J, Sakthivel N (2013) Molecular and functional characterization of bacteria isolated from straw and goat manure based vermicompost. Appl Soil Ecol 70:33–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pedersen JA, Simpson MA, Bockheim JG, Kumar K (2011) Characterization of soil organic carbon in drained thaw-lake basins of Arctic Alaska using NMR and FTIR photoacoustic spectroscopy. Org Geochem 42:947–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Randall EW, Mahieu N, Powlson DS, Christensen BT (1995) Fertilization effects on organic matter in physically fractionated soils as studied by 13C NMR: results from two long-term field experiments. Eur J Soil Sci 46:557–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reshef DN, Reshef YA, Finucane HK, Grossman SR, McVean G, Turnbaugh PJ, Lander ES, Mitzenmacher M, Sabeti PC (2011) Detecting novel associations in large data sets. Science 334:1518–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T (2003) Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13:2498–2504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Simonetti G, Francioso O, Nardi S, Berti A, Brugnoli E, Lugato E, Morari F (2012) Characterization of humic carbon in soil aggregates in a long-term experiment with manure and mineral fertilization. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76:880–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Skjemstad JO, Frost RL, Barron PF (1983) Structural units in humic acids from southeastern Queensland soils as determined by 13C NMR spectroscopy. Aust J Soil Res 21:539–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Skjemstad JO, Clarke P, Taylor JA, Oades JM, Newman RH (1994) The removal of magnetic materials from surface soil. A soild state 13C CP/MAS NMR study. Aust J Soil Res 32:1215–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Solomon D, Lehmann J, Thies J, Schaefer T, Liang B, Kinyangi J, Neves E, Petersen J, Luizao F, Skjemstad J (2007) Molecular signature and sources of biochemical recalcitrance of organic C in Amazonian Dark Earths. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:2285–2298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Su JQ, Ding LJ, Xue K, Yao HY, Quensen J, Bai SJ, Wei WX, Wu JS, Zhou JZ, Tiedje JM, Zhu YG (2015) Long-term balanced fertilization increases the soil microbial functional diversity in a phosphorus-limited paddy soil. Mol Ecol 24:136–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tan H, Barret M, Mooij MJ, Rice O, Morrissey JP, Dobson A, Griffiths B, O’Gara F (2013) Long-term phosphorus fertilisation increased the diversity of the total bacterial community and the phoD phosphorus mineraliser group in pasture soils. Biol Fertil Soils 49:661–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tapia-Torres Y, Rodriguez-Torres MD, Elser JJ, Islas A, Souza V, Garcia-Oliva F, Olmedo-Alvarez G (2016) How to live with phosphorus scarcity in soil and sediment: lessons from bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:4652–4662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tian J, Lou Y, Gao Y, Fang H, Liu S, Xu M, Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y (2017) Response of soil organic matter fractions and composition of microbial community to long-term organic and mineral fertilization. Biol Fertil Soils 53:523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Turner BL, Lambers H, Condron LM, Cramer MD, Leake JR, Richardson AE, Smith SE (2013) Soil microbial biomass and the fate of phosphorus during long-term ecosystem development. Plant Soil 367:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wang H, Liu SR, Wang JX, Shi ZM, Xu J, Hong PZ, Ming AG, Yu HL, Chen L, Lu LH, Cai DX (2016) Differential effects of conifer and broadleaf litter inputs on soil organic carbon chemical composition through altered soil microbial community composition. Sci Rep 6:27097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wang HY, Nie Y, Butterly CR, Wang L, Chen QH, Tian W, Song BB, Xi YG, Wang Y (2017) Fertilization alters microbial community composition and functional patterns by changing the chemical nature of soil organic carbon: a field study in a Halosol. Geoderma 292:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Xia M, Zhao BZ, Xiying H, Zhang JB (2015) Soil quality in relation to agricultural production in the North China Plain. Pedosphere 25:592–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Xia Y, Wang YB, Wang Y, Chin FYL, Zhang T (2016) Cellular adhesiveness and cellulolytic capacity in Anaerolineae revealed by omics-based genome interpretation. Biotechnol Biofuels 9:111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Xun WB, Xu ZH, Li W, Ren Y, Huang T, Ran W, Wang BR, Shen QR, Zhang RF (2016) Long-term organic-inorganic fertilization ensures great soil productivity and bacterial diversity after natural-to-agricultural ecosystem conversion. J Microbiol 54:611–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yan X, Zhou H, Zhu QH, Wang XF, Zhang YZ, Yu XC, Peng X (2013) Carbon sequestration efficiency in paddy soil and upland soil under long-term fertilization in southern China. Soil Tillage Res 130:42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yang Y, Li X, Liu J, Zhou Z, Zhang T, Wang X (2017) Bacterial diversity as affected by application of manure in red soils of subtropical China. Biol Fertil Soils 53:639–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yu HY, Ding WX, Chen ZM, Zhang HJ, Luo JF, Bolan N (2015) Accumulation of organic C components in soil and aggregates. Sci Rep 5:13804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zech W, Senesi N, Guggenberger G, Kaiser K, Lehmann J, Miano TM, Miltner A, Schroth G (1997) Factors controlling humification and mineralization of soil organic matter in the tropics. Geoderma 79:117–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhang A, Zhao G, Gao T, Wang W, Li J, Zhang S, Zhu B (2013a) Solubilization of insoluble potassium and phosphate by PaenibacilluskribensisCX-7: a soil microorganism with biological control potential. Afr J Microbiol Res 7:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhang HJ, Ding WX, Yu HY, He XH (2013b) Carbon uptake by a microbial community during 30-day treatment with C-13-glucose of a sandy loam soil fertilized for 20 years with NPK or compost as determined by a GC-C-IRMS analysis of phospholipid fatty acids. Soil Biol Biochem 57:228–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhang JC, Zhang L, Wang P, Huang QW, Yu GH, Li DC, Shen QR, Ran W (2013c) The role of non-crystalline Fe in the increase of SOC after long-term organic manure application to the red soil of southern China. Eur J Soil Sci 64:797–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhang YL, Yao SH, Mao JD, Olk DC, Cao XY, Zhang B (2015) Chemical composition of organic matter in a deep soil changed with a positive priming effect due to glucose addition as investigated by 13C NMR spectroscopy. Soil Biol Biochem 85:137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhao BZ, Chen J, Zhang JB, Qin SW (2010) Soil microbial biomass and activity response to repeated drying-rewetting cycles along a soil fertility gradient modified by long-term fertilization management practices. Geoderma 160:218–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zhao BZ, Chen J, Zhang JB, Xin XL, Hao XY (2013) How different long-term fertilization strategies influence crop yield and soil properties in a maize field in the North China Plain. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 176:99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zhou ZG, Chen N, Cao XY, Chua T, Mao JD, Mandel RD, Bettis EA III, Thompson ML (2014) Composition of clay-fraction organic matter in Holocene paleosols revealed by advanced solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Geoderma 223:54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dandan Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lin Chen
    • 1
  • Jisheng Xu
    • 1
  • Lei Ma
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dan C. Olk
    • 3
  • Bingzi Zhao
    • 1
  • Jiabao Zhang
    • 1
  • Xiuli Xin
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesNanjingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.USDA-ARSNational Laboratory for Agriculture and the EnvironmentAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations