Simulated leaf litter addition causes opposite priming effects on natural forest and plantation soils
- 308 Downloads
The conversion of natural forests to tree plantations alters the quality and decreases the quantity of litter inputs into the soil, but how the alteration of litter inputs affect soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition remain unclear. We examined SOM decomposition by adding 13C-labeled leaf-litter of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook) to soils from a natural evergreen broad-leaved forest and an adjacent Chinese fir plantation converted from a natural evergreen broad-leaved forest 42 years ago. Over 195 days, we monitored CO2 efflux and its δ13C, microbial biomass, and the composition of microbial groups by phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs). To distinguish priming mechanisms, partitioning of C sources in CO2 and microbial biomass was determined based on δ13C. Leaf-litter addition to natural forest increased microbial biomass and induced up to 14% faster SOM decomposition (positive priming) than that in soil without litter. In contrast, negative priming in soils under plantation indicated preferential use of added leaf-litter rather than recalcitrant SOM. This preferential use of leaf-litter was supported by an increased fungal to bacterial ratio and litter-derived (13C) microbial biomass, reflecting increased substrate recalcitrance, the respective changes in microbial substrate utilization and increased C use efficiency. The magnitude and direction of priming effects depend on microbial preferential utilization of new litter or SOM. Concluding, the impact of coniferous leaf-litter inputs on the SOM priming is divergent in natural evergreen broad-leaved forests and plantations, an important consideration in understanding long-term C dynamics and cycling in natural and plantation forest ecosystems.
KeywordsMicrobial community composition Priming effects Selective decomposition Subtropical forest soils Land-use effects
We thank Soil Science Consulting (https://soilscicon.wordpress.com) for help in the preparation of the manuscript.
The research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2016YFD0600204), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. U1405231, U1505233, and 31470501), and the National “973” Program of China (No. 2014CB954003). The publication was supported by the Government Program of Competitive Growth of Kazan Federal University and with the support of the “RUDN University program 5-100.”
- FAO (2006) Global forest resources assessment 2005: progress towards sustainable forest management. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Kramer S, Marhan S, Ruess L, Armbruster W, Butenschoen O, Haslwimmer H, Kuzyakov Y, Pausch J, Scheunemann N, Schoene J, Schmalwasser A, Totsche KU, Walker F, Scheu S, Kandeler E (2012) Carbon flow into microbial and fungal biomass as basis for the belowground food web of agroecosystems. Pedobiologia 55:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lin Z, Li Y, Tang C, Luo Y, Fu W, Cai X, Li Y, Yue T, Jiang P, Hu S, Chang SX (2018) Converting natural evergreen broadleaf forests to intensively managed moso bamboo plantations affects the pool size and stability of soil organic carbon and enzyme activities. Biol Fertil Soils 54:467–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B, Stevens MHH, Oksanen MJ, Suggests M (2007) The vegan package. Commun Ecol Package 10Google Scholar
- Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J, Houghton R, Kauppi PE, Kurz Werner A, Phillips OL, Shvidenko A, Lewis SL, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Jackson RB, Pacala S, McGuire AD, Piao S, Rautiainen A, Sitch S, Hayes D (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333:988–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- SFA (2009) China’s forestry 2004–2008. China Forestry Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- State Soil Survey Service of China (1998) China soil. China Agriculture Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar