Advertisement

A microfacet-based BRDF for the accurate and efficient rendering of high-definition specular normal maps

  • Xavier ChermainEmail author
  • Frédéric Claux
  • Stéphane Mérillou
Original Article

Abstract

Complex specular microstructures found in glittery, scratched or brushed metal materials exhibit high-frequency variations in reflected light intensity. These variations are important for the human eye and give materials their uniqueness and personality. To model such microsurfaces, high-definition normal maps are very effective. The works of Yan et al. (ACM Trans Graph 33(4):116:1–116:9, 2014; ACM Trans Graph 35(4):56:1–56:9, 2016) enable the rendering of such material representations by evaluating a microfacet-based BRDF related to a whole ray footprint. Still, in specific configurations and especially at grazing angles, their method does not fully capture the expected material appearance. We propose to build upon their work and tackle the problem of accuracy using a more physically based reflection model. To do so, the normal map is approximated with a mixture of anisotropic, noncentered Beckmann normal distribution functions from which a closed form for the masking–shadowing term can be derived. Based on our formal definition, we provide a fast approximation leading to a performance overhead varying from 5 to 20% compared to the method of Yan et al. (2016). Our results show that we more closely match ground truth renderings than their methods.

Keywords

Microfacet BRDF Specular normal maps Microstructures Glints 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (avi 221998 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Atanasov, A., Koylazov, V.: A practical stochastic algorithm for rendering mirror-like flakes. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Talks, SIGGRAPH ’16, pp. 67:1–67:2. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belcour, L., Yan, L.Q., Ramamoorthi, R., Nowrouzezahrai, D.: Antialiasing complex global illumination effects in path-space. ACM Trans. Graph. 36(1), 9:1–9:13 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bosch, C., Patow, G.: Real-time path-based surface detail. Comput. Graph. 34(4), 430–440 (2010). Procedural methods in computer graphics illustrative visualizationCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bosch, C., Pueyo, X., Mérillou, S., Ghazanfarpour, D.: A physically based model for rendering realistic scratches. Comput. Graph. Forum 23(3), 361–370 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dupuy, J., Heitz, E., Iehl, J.C., Poulin, P., Neyret, F., Ostromoukhov, V.: Linear efficient antialiased displacement and reflectance mapping. ACM Trans. Graph. 32(6), 211:1–211:11 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Han, C., Sun, B., Ramamoorthi, R., Grinspun, E.: Frequency domain normal map filtering. ACM Trans. Graph. 26(3), 28 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heckbert, P.S.: Fundamentals of texture mapping and image warping. Master’s thesis (1989)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heitz, E.: Understanding the masking–shadowing function in microfacet-based BRDFs. J. Comput. Graph. Tech. 3(2), 48–107 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Igehy, H.: Tracing ray differentials. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, SIGGRAPH ’99, pp. 179–186. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jakob, W., Hašan, M., Yan, L.Q., Lawrence, J., Ramamoorthi, R., Marschner, S.: Discrete stochastic microfacet models. ACM Trans. Graph. 33(4), 115:1–115:10 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lewis, R.R.: Making shaders more physically plausible. Comput. Graph. Forum 13(2), 109–120 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Merillou, S., Dischler, J., Ghazanfarpour, D.: Surface scratches: measuring, modeling and rendering. Vis. Comput. 17(1), 30–45 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Olano, M., Baker, D.: Lean mapping. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games, I3D ’10, pp. 181–188. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pharr, M., Jakob, W., Humphreys, G.: Physically Based Rendering: From Theory to Implementation, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raymond, B., Guennebaud, G., Barla, P.: Multi-scale rendering of scratched materials using a structured SV-BRDF model. ACM Trans. Graph. 35(4), 57:1–57:11 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith, B.: Geometrical shadowing of a random rough surface. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 15(5), 668–671 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Suykens, F., Willems, Y.D.: Path differentials and applications. In: Gortler, S.J., Myszkowski, K. (eds.) Rendering Techniques 2001, pp. 257–268. Springer, Vienna (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Toksvig, M.: Mipmapping normal maps. J. Graph. Tools 10(3), 65–71 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Walter, B., Marschner, S.R., Li, H., Torrance, K.E.: Microfacet models for refraction through rough surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 18th Eurographics Conference on Rendering Techniques, EGSR’07, pp. 195–206. Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xu, C., Wang, R., Zhao, S., Bao, H.: Real-time linear BRDF MIP-mapping. Comput. Graph. Forum 36(4), 27–34 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yan, L.Q., Hašan, M., Jakob, W., Lawrence, J., Marschner, S., Ramamoorthi, R.: Rendering glints on high-resolution normal-mapped specular surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 33(4), 116:1–116:9 (2014)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yan, L.Q., Hašan, M., Marschner, S., Ramamoorthi, R.: Position-normal distributions for efficient rendering of specular microstructure. ACM Trans. Graph. 35(4), 56:1–56:9 (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yan, L.Q., Hašan, M., Walter, B., Marschner, S., Ramamoorthi, R.: Rendering specular microgeometry with wave optics. ACM Trans. Graph. 37(4), 75:1–75:10 (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNRS, XLIM, UMR 7252Univ. LimogesLimogesFrance

Personalised recommendations