Advertisement

Geo-Marine Letters

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 359–370 | Cite as

Puzzling micro-relief (mounds) of a soft-bottomed, semi-enclosed shallow marine environment

  • E. Manoutsoglou
  • T. Hasiotis
  • D. Kyriakoudi
  • A. Velegrakis
  • J. Lowag
Original
  • 108 Downloads

Abstract

A dataset comprising geomorphological information (side-scan sonar, bathymetry, samples, drop camera, scuba diving, and a limited number of subbottom profiles) revealed a large number of low-relief buildups occupying almost half of the Gulf of Gera, a shallow land-locked environment. They probably represent mud mounds constructed of biogenic fragments and benthic assemblages consisting mainly of mollusks in a fine-grained matrix, and they are confined to the central part of the gulf. According to their morphometric characteristics and surface distribution, the mounds were separated into three subtypes with the highest (up to 2.5 m), larger coalescing features occurring close to the gulf entrance, whereas the smaller and more circular features appear in an elongated zone at the center of the gulf. This configuration coincides with the gulf’s circulation pattern that disperses and transports nutrients and fine-grained material. The high-resolution subbottom profiles, acquired in a restricted zone of the southeastern gulf, have shown the presence of paleo-mound surfaces in the Holocene highstand surface layer and fluids in the underlying sediments. Similar formations have been rarely reported in the literature, and those other reports are from different environmental settings. Consistent with the literature, they are probably developed due to the interplay of physical and biological processes. However, only an interdisciplinary study could shed light on the specific processes that drive their formation and their unique distribution pattern in the specific environment of the Gulf of Gera.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the valuable assistance of O. Andreadis, Dr. M. Sini, and Ch. Katsoupis during the field work and that of Mrs. Sofiannidi in the laboratory. N. Xatzilias is gratefully acknowledged for his time mastering the R/V Amfitriti during field operations. The SES-2000 light plus data were acquired during trials for the Innomars’ student project campaign in 2013. The authors appreciate the editorial comments of Andrew Green and the constructive remarks of the two reviewers that helped us to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anagnostou C, Sioulas A (1989) A sedimentological study of the Gulf of Geras (Lesvos) and the possible anthropogenic influence in the geochemical cycle of the region. Bull Geol Soc Greece XXIII/1:193–207Google Scholar
  2. Arhonditsis G, Tsirtsis G, Angelidis Μ, Karydis Μ (2000a) Quantification of the effects of nonpoint nutrient sources to coastal marine eutrophication: applications to a semi-enclosed gulf in the Mediterranean Sea. Ecol Model 129:209–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arhonditsis G, Giourga C, Loumou A (2000b) Ecological patterns and comparative nutrient dynamics of natural and agricultural Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Environ Manag 26(5):527–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arhonditsis G, Tsirtsis G, Karydis M (2002) The effects of episodic rainfall events to the dynamics of coastal marine ecosystems: applications to a semi-enclosed gulf in the Meditteranean Sea. J Mar Syst 35:183–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldo AL, Madella M, Vila A, Estevez J (2010) Micromorphological perspectives on the stratigraphical excavation of shell middens: a first approximation from the ethnohistorical site Tunel VII, Tierra del Fuego (Argentina). J Archaeol Sci 37:1252–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blott SJ, Pye K (2001) Gradistat: a grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments. Earth Surf Process Landf 26:1237–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boivin N, Fuller DQ (2009) Shell middens, ships and seeds: exploring coastal subsistence, maritime trade and the dispersal of domesticates in and around the ancient Arabian Peninsula. J World Prehist 22:113–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carbotte SM, Bell RE, Ryan WBF, McHugh C, Slange A, Nitsche F, Rubenstone J (2004) Environmental change and oyster colonization within the Hudson River estuary linked to Holocene climate. Geo-Mar Lett 24:212–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christodoulou D, Papatheodorou G, Ferentinos G, Masson M (2003) Active seepage in two contrasting pockmark fields in Patras and Corinth Gulfs, Greece. Geo-Mar Lett 23:194–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chronis A, Hasiotis T, Lowag J (2014) Relationship between gas-bearing sediments and biogenic mounds (Student Research Project in Hydrography). Hydro Int 18(8):22–25Google Scholar
  11. Colden A, Fall K, Cartwright G, Friedrichs C (2016) Sediment suspension and deposition across restored oyster reefs of varying orientation to flow: implications for restoration. Estuar Coasts 39:1435–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Correa T, Grasmueck M, Eberli G, Reed J, Verwer K, Purkis S (2012) Variability of cold-water coral mounds in a high sediment input and tidal current regime, Straits of Florida. Sedimentology 59:1278–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cukur D, Krastel S, Cagatay N, Damci E, Meydan A, Kim S-P (2015) Evidence of extensive carbonate mounds and sublacustrine channels in shallow waters of Lake Van, eastern Turkey, based on high-resolution chirp subbottom profiler and multibeam echosounder data. Geo-Mar Lett 35:329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Folk RL (1980) Petrology of the sedimentary rocks, 2nd edn. Hemphill Publishing Company, AustinGoogle Scholar
  15. Goff J, Lugrin L, Gulick S, Thirumalai K, Okumura Y (2016) Oyster reef die-offs in stratigraphic record of Corpus Christi Bay, Texas, possibly caused by drought-driven extreme salinity changes. The Holocene 26(4):511–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hovland M (2008) Deep-water coral reefs. Unique biodiversity hotspots. Praxis. Springer ISBN 1402084617Google Scholar
  17. Judd A, Hovland M (2007) Seabed fluid flow: the impact on geology, biology and the marine environment. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  18. Karageorgis A, Papadopoulos V, Rousakis G, Kanellopoulos T, Georgopoulos D (2011) Submarine groundwater discharges in Kalogria Bay, Messinia-Greece: geophysical investigation and one-year high resolution monitoring of hydrological parameters. In: Lambrakis N, Stournaras G, Katsanou K (eds) Advances in the research of aquatic environment, vol 1. Springer, pp 469–476Google Scholar
  19. Karnaukh V, Astakhov A, Vereshchagina O, Tsoy I, Kosmach D, Sagalaev S, Volkova T, Dubina V, Prushkovskaya I (2016) Formation of subsurface shallow gas accumulations in Amurskiy Bay (Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan) as a result of postglacial sea-level change, paleoceanographic conditions and hydrological activity. Mar Geol 372:31–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lambrakis NJ, Stamatis GN (2008) Contribution to the study of thermal waters in Greece: chemical patterns and origin of thermal water in the thermal springs of Lesvos. Hydrol Process 22:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu Q-X, Weerman E, Herman P, Olff H, van de Koppel J (2012) Alternative mechanisms alter the emergent properties of self-organization in mussel beds. Proc R Soc B 279:2744–2753.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manoutsoglou Ε, Hasiotis Τ, Velegrakis Α (2013) Acoustic detection of benthic assemblages in a land-locked shallow marine environment: Gulf of Gera, Lesvos, Greece. 40th CIESM Congress, Marseill-France, pp 690Google Scholar
  23. Manoutsoglou E, Hasiotis T, Velegrakis A, Hatzilias N (2015) Acoustic observation of the soft substrate of Gera Gulf, Lesvos island. Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Oceanography & Fisheries, Mytilene, pp 1021–1024Google Scholar
  24. Martindale A, Letham B, McLaren D, Archer D, Burchell M, Shone BR (2009) Mapping of subsurface shell midden components through percussion coring: examples from the Dundas Islands. J Archaeol Sci 36:1565–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mazzullo S, Teal C, Bischoff W, Dimmick-Wells K, Wilhite B (2003) Sedimentary architecture and genesis of Holocene shallow-water mud-mounds, northern Belize. Sedimentology 50:743–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mistr S, Bercovici D (2003) A theoretical model of pattern formation in coral reefs. Ecosyst 6:61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Papatheodorou G, Hasiotis T, Ferentinos G (1993) Gas-charged sediments in the Aegean and Ionian Seas, Greece. Mar Geol 112:171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pavlides S, Tsapanos T, Zouros N, Sboras S, Koravos G, Chatzipetros A (2009) Using active fault data for assessing seismic hazard: a case study from NE Aegean Sea, Greece. XVIIth International Conference on Soil Mechanics & Geotechnical Engineering (2–3/10/2009), Alexandria, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  29. Pufahl PK, James NP (2006) Monospecific Pliocene oyster buildups, Murray Basin, South Australia: brackish water end member of the reef spectrum. Palaeoecology 233:11–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Purkis S, Kohler K, Riegl B, Rohmann S (2007) The statistics of natural shapes in modern coral reef landscapes. J Geol 115:493–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Riding R (2002) Structure and composition of organic reefs and carbonate mud mounds: concepts and categories. Earth Sci Rev 58:163–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rietkerk M, van de Koppel JVD (2008) Regular pattern formation in real ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 23:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stanley GD (2001) Introduction to reef ecosystems and their evolution. In: Stanley GD Jr (ed) The history and sedimentology of ancient reef systems. Kluwer /Plenum, New York, pp 1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stewart B, Bryan K, Pilditch C, Santos I (2018) Submarine groundwater discharge estimates using radium isotopes and related nutrient inputs into Tauranga Harbour (New Zealand). Estuar Coasts 41:384–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sugimoto R, Honda H, Kobayashi S, Takao Y, Tahara D, Tominaga O, Taniguchi M (2016) Seasonal changes in submarine groundwater discharge and associated nutrient transport into a tideless semi-enclosed embayment (Obama bay, Japan). Estuar Coasts 39:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsatiris A, Papadopoulos V, Makri D, Topouzelis K, Manoutsoglou E, Hasiotis T, Katsanevakis S (2018) Spatial distribution, abundance and habitat use of the endemic Mediterranean fan mussel Pinna nobilis in the Gera Gulf, Lesvos (Greece): comparison of design-based and model-based approaches. Mediterr Mar Sci (accepted for publ)Google Scholar
  37. Twichell D, Edmiston L, Andrews B, Stevenson W, Donoghue J, Poore R, Osterman L (2010) Geologic controls on the recent evolution of oyster reefs in Apalachicola Bay and St. George Sound, Florida. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 88:385–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van de Koppel J, Bouma T, Herman P (2012) The influence of local- and landscape-scale processes on spatial self-organization in estuarine ecosystems. J Exp Biol 215:962–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Leeuwen B, Augustijn D, van Wesenbeeck B, Hulscher S, de Vries M (2010) Modeling the influence of a young mussel bed on fine sediment dynamics on an intertidal flat in the Wadden Sea. Ecol Eng 36:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Widdows J, Pope N, Brinsley M, Gascoigne J, Kaiser M (2009) Influence of self-organised structures on near-bed hydrodynamics and sediment dynamics within a mussel (Mytilus edulis) bed in the Menai Strait. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 379:92–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wood R (1999) Reef evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, p 415Google Scholar
  42. Zenetos A, Papathanasiou E (1989) Community parameters and multivariate analysis as a means of assessing the effects of tannery effluents on macrobenthos. Mar Pollut Bull 20(4):176–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Manoutsoglou
    • 1
  • T. Hasiotis
    • 1
  • D. Kyriakoudi
    • 1
  • A. Velegrakis
    • 1
  • J. Lowag
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Marine SciencesUniversity of the AegeanMytileneGreece
  2. 2.Innomar Technologie GmbHRostockGermany

Personalised recommendations