Advertisement

Implementation of Haar wavelet, higher order Haar wavelet, and differential quadrature methods on buckling response of strain gradient nonlocal beam embedded in an elastic medium

  • Subrat Kumar Jena
  • S. ChakravertyEmail author
  • Mohammad Malikan
Original Article

Abstract

The present investigation is focused on the buckling behavior of strain gradient nonlocal beam embedded in Winkler elastic foundation. The first-order strain gradient model has been combined with the Euler–Bernoulli beam theory to formulate the proposed model using Hamilton’s principle. Three numerically efficient methods, namely Haar wavelet method (HWM), higher order Haar wavelet method (HOHWM), and differential quadrature method (DQM) are employed to analyze the buckling characteristics of the strain gradient nonlocal beam. The impacts of several parameters such as nonlocal parameter, strain gradient parameter, and Winkler modulus parameter on critical buckling loads are studied effectively. The basic ideas of the numerical methods, viz. HWM, HOHWM, and DQM are presented comprehensively. Also, a comparative study has been conducted to explore the effectiveness and applicability of all the three numerical methods in terms of convergence study. Finally, the results, obtained by this investigation, are validated properly with other works published earlier.

Keywords

Buckling behavior Strain gradient model Nonlocal beam HWM HOHWM DQM 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first two authors are very much thankful to the Defence Research and Development Organization(DRDO), New Delhi, India (Sanction Code: DG/TM/ERIPR/GIA/17-18/0129/020) for the funding to carry out the present research work.

References

  1. 1.
    Press WH, Tuekolsky SA, Wetterling WT (2002) Numerical recipes in C ++: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murmu T, Pradhan SC (2009) Buckling analysis of a single-walled carbon nanotubes embedded in an elastic medium based on nonlocal elasticity and Timoshenko beam theory and using DQM. Physica E 41(7):1232–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ansari R, Arjangpay A (2014) Nanoscale vibration and buckling of single-walled carbon nanotubes using the meshless local Petrov–Galerkin method. Physica E 63:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chakraverty S, Behera L (2016) Static and dynamic problems of nanobeams and nanoplates, 1st edn. World Scientific Publishing Co, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Malikan M, Jabbarzadeh M, Dastjerdi Sh (2017) Non-linear static stability of bi-layer carbon nanosheets resting on an elastic matrix under various types of in-plane shearing loads in thermo-elasticity using nonlocal continuum. Microsyst Technol 23:2973–2991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malikan M, Sadraee Far MN (2018) Differential quadrature method for dynamic buckling of graphene sheet coupled by a viscoelastic medium using Neperian frequency based on nonlocal elasticity theory. J Appl Comput Mech 4:147–160Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Golmakani ME, Malikan M, Sadraee Far MN, Majidi HR (2018) Bending and buckling formulation of graphene sheets based on nonlocal simple first order shear deformation theory. Mater Res Express 5:065010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ansari R, Sahmani S, Rouhi H (2011) Axial buckling analysis of single-walled carbon nanotubes in thermal environments via the Rayleigh–Ritz technique. Comput Mater Sci 50:3050–3055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S (2018) Free vibration analysis of variable cross-section single layered graphene nano-ribbons (SLGNRs) using differential quadrature method. Front Built Environ 4:63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Behera L, Chakraverty S (2015) Application of differential quadrature method in free vibration analysis of nanobeams based on various nonlocal theories. Comput Math Appl 69:1444–1462MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chakraverty S, Jena SK (2018) Free vibration of single walled carbon nanotube resting on exponentially varying elastic foundation. Curved Layer Struct 5:260–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bakhshi Khaniki H, Hosseini-Hashemi Sh, Nezamabadi A (2018) Buckling analysis of nonuniform nonlocal strain gradient beams using generalized differential quadrature method. Alex Eng J 57:1361–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen C, Li S, Dai L, Qian C-Z (2014) Buckling and stability analysis of a piezoelectric viscoelastic nanobeam subjected to van der Waals forces. Commun Nonlinear Sci 19:1626–1637MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tuna M, Kirca M (2017) Bending, buckling and free vibration analysis of Euler–Bernoulli nanobeams using Eringen’s nonlocal integral model via finite element method. Compos Struct 179:269–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S (2018) Free vibration analysis of single walled carbon nanotube with exponentially varying stiffness. Curved Layer Struct 5:201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ghavamian A, Öchsner A (2012) Numerical investigation on the influence of defects on the buckling behavior of single-and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Physica E 46:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S, Tornabene F (2019) Vibration characteristics of nanobeam with exponentially varying flexural rigidity resting on linearly varying elastic foundation using differential quadrature method. Mater Res Express 6:085051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S, Jena RM, Tornabene F (2019) A novel fractional nonlocal model and its application in buckling analysis of Euler–Bernoulli nanobeam. Mater Res Express 6:055016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S, Tornabene F (2019) Dynamical behavior of nanobeam embedded in constant, linear, parabolic, and sinusoidal types of Winkler elastic foundation using first-order nonlocal strain gradient model. Mater Res Express 6:60850f2Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jena RM, Chakraverty S, Jena SK (2019) Dynamic response analysis of fractionally damped beams subjected to external loads using homotopy analysis method. J Appl Comput Mech 5:355–366Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S (2019) Differential quadrature and differential transformation methods in buckling analysis of nanobeams. Curved Layer Struct 6:68–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S (2018) Free vibration analysis of Euler–Bernoulli Nano beam using differential transform method. Int J Comput Mater Sci Eng 7:1850020Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S, Tornabene F (2019) Buckling behavior of nanobeams placed in electromagnetic field using shifted Chebyshev polynomials-based Rayleigh–Ritz method. Nanomaterials 9(9):1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S, Jena RM (2019) Propagation of uncertainty in free vibration of Euler–Bernoulli nanobeam. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 41(10):436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S (2019) Dynamic analysis of single-layered graphene nano-ribbons (SLGNRs) with variable cross-section resting on elastic foundation. Curved Layer Struct 6:132–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Haar A (1910) Zur Theorie der orthogonalen Funktionensysteme (German). Mathematische Annalen 69:331–371MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hariharan G, Kannan K (2013) An overview of Haar wavelet method for solving differential and integral equations. World Appl Sci J 23:01–14Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Majak J, Shvartsman B, Karjust K, Mikola M, Haavajõe A (2015) On the accuracy of the Haar wavelet discretization method. Compos Part B Eng 80:321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jena SK, Chakraverty S (2019) Dynamic behavior of an electromagnetic nanobeam using the Haar wavelet method and the higher-order Haar wavelet method. Eur Phys J Plus 134:538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Majak J, Pohlak M, Karjust K, Eerme M, Kurnitski J, Shvartsman BS (2018) New higher order Haar wavelet method: application to FGM structures. Compos Struct 201:72–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shu C (2000) Differential quadrature and its application in engineering. Springer, BerlinzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bert CW, Malik M (1996) Differential quadrature method in computational mechanics: a review. Appl Mech Rev 49:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tornabene F, Fantuzzi N, Ubertini F, Viola E (2015) Strong formulation finite element method based on differential quadrature: a survey. Appl Mech Rev 67:020801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hein H, Feklistova L (2011) Free vibrations of non-uniform and axially functionally graded beams using Haar wavelets. Eng Struct 33:3696–3701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lepik Ü (2011) Buckling of elastic beams by the Haar wavelet method. Est J Eng 17:271–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kirs M, Mikola M, Haavajoe A, Ounapuu E, Shvartsman B, Majak J (2016) Haar wavelet method for vibration analysis of nanobeams. Waves Wavelets Fractals Adv Anal 2:20–28zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Reddy JN (2007) Nonlocal theories for bending, buckling and vibration of beams. Int J Eng Sci 45:288–307zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Malikan M, Tornabene F, Dimitri R (2018) Nonlocal three-dimensional theory of elasticity for buckling behavior of functionally graded porous nanoplates using volume integrals. Mater Res Express 5:095006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Thai S, Thai HT, Vo TP, Patel VI (2018) A simple shear deformation theory for nonlocal beams. Compos Struct 183:262–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhu X, Wang Y, Dai H-H (2017) Buckling analysis of Euler–Bernoulli beams using Eringen’s two-phase nonlocal model. Int J Eng Sci 116:130–140MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tuna M, Kirca M (2016) Exact solution of Eringen’s nonlocal integral model for vibration and buckling of Euler–Bernoulli beam. Int J Eng Sci 107:54–67zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thai H-T (2012) A nonlocal beam theory for bending, buckling, and vibration of nanobeams. Int J Eng Sci 52:56–64MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Malikan M (2017) Electro-mechanical shear buckling of piezoelectric nanoplate using modified couple stress theory based on simplified first order shear deformation theory. Appl Math Model 48:196–207MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Akgöz B, Civalek Ö (2012) Free vibration analysis for single-layered graphene sheets in an elastic matrix via modified couple stress theory. Mater Design 42:164–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nematollahi MS, Mohammadi H (2019) Geometrically nonlinear vibration analysis of sandwich nanoplates based on higher-order nonlocal strain gradient theory. Int J Eng Sci 156:31–45Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Malikan M, Nguyen VB, Tornabene F (2018) Damped forced vibration analysis of single-walled carbon nanotubes resting on viscoelastic foundation in thermal environment using nonlocal strain gradient theory. Eng Sci Technol Int J 21:778–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Malikan M, Dimitri R, Tornabene F (2019) Transient response of oscillated carbon nanotubes with an internal and external damping. Compos Part B Eng 158:198–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang J, Shen H, Zhang B, Liu J, Zhang Y (2018) Complex modal analysis of transverse free vibrations for axially moving nanobeams based on the nonlocal strain gradient theory. Physica E 101:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    She GL, Yan KM, Zhang YL, Liu HB, Ren YR (2018) Wave propagation of functionally graded porous nanobeams based on non-local strain gradient theory. Eur Phys J Plus 133:368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mehralian F, Tadi Beni Y, Karimi Zeverdejani M (2017) Nonlocal strain gradient theory calibration using molecular dynamics simulation based on small scale vibration of nanotubes. Physica B 514:61–69zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Malikan M, Nguyen VB, Dimitri R, Tornabene F (2019) Dynamic modeling of non-cylindrical curved viscoelastic single-walled carbon nanotubes based on the second gradient theory. Mater Res Express 6:075041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zhu X, Li L (2017) Closed form solution for a nonlocal strain gradient rod in tension. Int J Eng Sci 119:16–28MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zhu X, Li L (2017) On longitudinal dynamics of nanorods. Int J Eng Sci 120:129–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tang H, Li L, Hu Y, Meng W, Duan K (2019) Vibration of nonlocal strain gradient beams incorporating Poisson’s ratio and thickness effects. Thin-Walled Struct 137:377–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Li L, Tang H, Hu Y (2018) The effect of thickness on the mechanics of nanobeams. Int J Eng Sci 123:81–91MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Li L, Hu Y (2015) Buckling analysis of size-dependent nonlinear beams based on a nonlocal strain gradient theory. Int J Eng Sci 97:84–94MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lim CW, Zhang G, Reddy JN (2015) A higher-order nonlocal elasticity and strain gradient theory and its applications in wave propagation. J Mech Phys Solids 78:298–313MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Khaniki HB, Hosseini-Hashemi S (2017) Buckling analysis of tapered nanobeams using nonlocal strain gradient theory and a generalized differential quadrature method. Mater Res Express 4:065003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Li L, Hu Y (2015) Buckling analysis of size-dependent nonlinear beams based on a nonlocal strain gradient theory. Int J Eng Sci 97:84–94MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Li L, Li X, Hu Y (2016) Free vibration analysis of nonlocal strain gradient beams made of functionally graded material. Int J Eng Sci 102:77–92zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Li L, Hu Y (2017) Post-buckling analysis of functionally graded nanobeams incorporating nonlocal stress and microstructure-dependent strain gradient effects. Int J Eng Sci 120:159–170Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Karami B, Shahsavari D, Li L (2018) Hygrothermal wave propagation in viscoelastic graphene under in-plane magnetic field based on nonlocal strain gradient theory. Physica E 97:317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sahmani S, Fattahi AM, Ahmed NA (2019) Analytical mathematical solution for vibrational response of postbuckled laminated FG-GPLRC nonlocal strain gradient micro-/nanobeams. Eng Comput 35:1173–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ebrahimi F, Barati MR, Civalek Ö (2019) Application of Chebyshev–Ritz method for static stability and vibration analysis of nonlocal microstructure-dependent nanostructures. Eng Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00742-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ebrahimi F, Karimiasl M, Mahesh V (2019) Chaotic dynamics and forced harmonic vibration analysis of magneto-electro-viscoelastic multiscale composite nanobeam. Eng Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00865-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Malikan M, Nguyen VB (2018) Buckling analysis of piezo-magnetoelectric nanoplates in hygrothermal environment based on a novel one variable plate theory combining with higher-order nonlocal strain gradient theory. Physica E 102:8–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Malikan M, Nguyen VB, Tornabene F (2018) Electromagnetic forced vibrations of composite nanoplates using nonlocal strain gradient theory. Mater Res Express 5:075031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Malikan M, Dimitri R, Tornabene F (2018) Effect of sinusoidal corrugated geometries on the vibrational response of viscoelastic nanoplates. Appl Sci 8:1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Chen CF, Hsiao CH (1997) Haar wavelet method for solving lumped and distributed-parameter systems. IEE Proc Control Theory Appl 144:87–94zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lepik U (2012) Exploring vibrations of cracked beams by the Haar wavelet method. Estonian J Eng 18:58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Quan JR, Chang CT (1989) New insights in solving distributed system equations by the quadrature method—I. Analysis. Comput Chem Eng 13:779–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Quan JR, Chang CT (1989) New insights in solving distributed system equations by the quadrature method—II. Numerical experiments. Comput Chem Eng 13:1017–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Majak J, Shvartsman BS, Kirs M, Pohlak M, Herranen H (2015) Convergence theorem for the Haar wavelet based discretization method. Compos Struct 126:227–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Kirs M, Eerme M, Bassir D, Tungel E (2019) Application of HOHWM for vibration analysis of nanobeams. Key Eng Mater 799:230–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Wang CM, Zhang YY, Ramesh SS, Kitipornchai S (2006) Buckling analysis of micro-and nano-rods/tubes based on nonlocal Timoshenko beam theory. J Phys D 39:3904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Shvartsman BS, Majak J (2016) Numerical method for stability analysis of functionally graded beams on elastic foundation. Appl Math Model 40:3713–3719MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsNational Institute of Technology RourkelaRourkelaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringGdansk University of TechnologyGdanskPoland
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringIslamic Azad University, Mashhad BranchMashhadIran

Personalised recommendations