Advertisement

Optimum design of three-dimensional steel frames with prismatic and non-prismatic elements

  • A. KavehEmail author
  • M. Z. Kabir
  • M. Bohlool
Original Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

In the present article, optimal seismic design of three-dimensional steel frames is carried out. The frames are subjected to gravity and earthquake loadings and are designed according to the LRFD-AISC design criteria. Here, ordinary moment frames are considered having lateral resisting systems. Two types of frames consisting of prismatic frames and non-prismatic frames are optimized and results are compared. Stresses of the elements and drift of the stories are limited in accordance with the AISC-LRFD. Analysis of the frames is performed by utilizing the response spectrum analysis (RSA) method. Three metaheuristic algorithms are utilized for optimizing the example 1, and the most competent algorithm is identified, and the remaining examples are optimized using the identified algorithm. The results of the optimization show lower weight for the non-prismatic frames compared to their prismatic counterparts.

Keywords

Prismatic Non-prismatic Optimal design Frame structures Metaheuristic algorithms 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    AISC 360–10 (2010) Specification for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASCE (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaveh A, Talatahari S (2010) Optimum design of skeletal structures using imperialist competitive algorithm. Comput Struct 88(21–22):1220–1229CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaveh A, Abbasgholiha H (2011) Optimum design of steel sway frames using big bang big crunch algorithm. Asian J Civil Eng 12(3):293–317Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Toğan V (2012) Design of planar steel frames using teaching–learning based optimization. Eng Struct 34:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Doğan E, Saka MP (2012) Optimum design of unbraced steel frames to LRFD–AISC using particle swarm optimization. Adv Eng Softw 46(1):27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Artar M, Daloğlu AT (2018) Optimum weight design of steel space frames with semi-rigid connections using harmony search and genetic algorithms. Neural Comput Appl 29(11):1089–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maheri MR, Talezadeh M (2018) An enhanced imperialist competitive algorithm for optimum design of skeletal structures. Swarm Evol Comput 40:24–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maheri MR, Shokrian H, Narimani MM (2017) An enhanced honey bee mating optimization algorithm for design of side sway steel frames. Adv Eng Softw 109:62–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carraro F, Lopez RH, Miguel LFF (2017) Optimum design of planar steel frames using the search group algorithm. J Brazil Soc Mech Sci Eng 39(4):1405–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murren P, Khandelwal K (2014) Design-driven harmony search (DDHS) in steel frame optimization. Eng Struct 59:798–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaveh A, BolandGerami A (2017) Optimal design of large-scale space steel frames using cascade enhanced colliding body optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(1):237–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaveh A, Ilchi Ghazaan M (2018) Meta-heuristic algorithms for optimal design of real-size structures. Springer, SwitzerlandCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaveh A, Dadras A, Bakhshpoori T (2018) Improved thermal exchange optimization algorithm for optimal design of skeletal structures. Smart Struct Syst 21(3):263–278Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaveh A, Ghafari MH, Gholipour Y (2017) Optimal seismic design of 3D steel moment frames: different ductility types. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56(6):1353–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carbas S (2016) Design optimization of steel frames using an enhanced firefly algorithm. Eng Optimiz 48(12):2007–2025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aydoğdu İ, Akın A, Saka MP (2016) Design optimization of real-world steel space frames using artificial bee colony algorithm with Levy flight distribution. Adv Eng Softw 92:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaveh A, Laknejadi K, Alinejad B (2012) Performance based multi-objective optimization of large steel structures. Acta Mech 223(2):355–369CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kazemzadeh Azad S, Hasançebi O (2015) Computationally efficient discrete sizing of steel frames via guided stochastic search heuristic. Comput Struct 156:12–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hasançebi O et al (2010) Comparison of non-deterministic search techniques in the optimum design of real size steel frames. Comput Struct 88(17–18):1033–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Degertekin SO (2007) A comparison of simulated annealing and genetic algorithm for optimum design of nonlinear steel space frames. Struct Multidiscip Optim 34(4):347–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaveh A, Ghafari MH, Gholipour Y (2017) Optimum seismic design of steel frames considering the connection types. J Construct Steel Res 130:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McKinstray R et al (2016) Comparison of optimal designs of steel portal frames including topological asymmetry considering rolled, fabricated and tapered sections. Eng Struct 111:505–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kaveh A (2006) Optimal structural analysis, 2nd edn. John Wiley, ChichesterzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kaveh A, Ilchi Ghazaan M (2014) Enhanced colliding bodies optimization for design problems with continuous and discrete variables. Adv Eng Softw 77:66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kaveh A, Ilchi Ghazaan M (2017) Vibrating particles system algorithm for truss optimization with multiple natural frequency constraints. Acta Mech 228(1):307–322MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan GV (2001) A new heuristic optimization algorithm harmony search. Simul 76(2):60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    The MathWorks (2013) MATLAB. Natick, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kazemzadeh Azad S, Hasançebi O, Kazemzadeh Azad S (2013) Upper bound strategy for metaheuristic based design optimization of steel frames. Adv Eng Softw 57:19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, School of Civil EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyTehran-16Iran
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations