A gravitational approach to modeling the representative volume geometry of particle-reinforced metal matrix composites

  • Yu. V. KhalevitskyEmail author
  • A. V. Konovalov
Original Article


Computational models of representative volumes of metal matrix composites are crucial for investigating material behavior on the microscale. Numerical simulations often employ finite element models of representative volumes. Such models are based on observations of material microstructural properties, for example, by means of electron microscopy. Constructing a geometrical model of a representative volume for further computations can be a tedious task. This paper presents a new approach to creating geometrical models of this kind. The approach is based on the simulation of rigid body motion in a gravitational field and allows one to automatically generate geometrical models of representative volumes. The approach capabilities are exemplified by two geometrical models of representative volume. One model describes a metal matrix composite with high volume fraction of prismatic reinforcement particles, produced by liquid metal infiltration. The other model describes a metal matrix composite with high volume fraction of metal pellets, produced by powder metallurgy.


Metal matrix composite Representative volume Numerical simulation Internal structure 



This work was partially supported by Russian Sсience Foundation (Project 14-19-01358) in the part of metal matrix composite model development.


  1. 1.
    Peters S (2013) Handbook of composites. Springer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chawla K (2012) Composite materials: science and engineering. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xue-bin L, Hua-min Z, Chun Z, Chao S (2000) A study of residual stress field in whisker reinforced metallic composite by using 3-D FEM. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Su Y, Ouyang Q, Zhang W et al (2014) Composite structure modeling and mechanical behavior of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schoutens JE (1984) Simple and precise measurements of fibre volume and void fractions in metal matrix composite materials. J Mater Sci. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee WJ, Kim YJ, Kang NH, Park IM, Park YH (2011) Finite-element modeling of the particle clustering effect in a powder-metallurgy-processed ceramic-particle-reinforced metal matrix composite on its mechanical properties. Mech Compos Mater. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mishnaevsky L (2007) Computational experiments in the mechanics of materials: concepts and tools. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Umer U, Ashfaq M, Qudeiri JA et al (2015) Modeling machining of particle-reinforced aluminum-based metal matrix composites using cohesive zone elements. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gusev AA (1997) Representative volume element size for elastic composites: a numerical study. J Mech Phys Solids. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ayyar A, Chawla N (2007) Three-dimensional (3D) microstructure-based modeling of crack growth in particle reinforced composites. J Mat Sci. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Williams J, Segurado J, LLorca J, Chawla N (2012) Three dimensional (3D) microstructure-based modeling of interfacial decohesion in particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hill R (1963) Elastic properties of reinforced solids: some theoretical principles. J Mech Phys Solids 11:357–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ostoja-Starzewski M (2006) Material spatial randomness: from statistical to representative volume element. Probab Eng Mech 21:112–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Drugan WJ, Willis JR (1996) A micromechanics-based nonlocal constitutive equation and estimates of representative volume element size for elastic composites. J Mech Phys Solids 44(4):497–524MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coffman VR, Reid ACE, Langer SA, Dogan G (2013) OOF3D: an image-based finite element solver for materials science. Appl Imaging Tech Mech Mater Struct. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    3D Image Processing: Accessed 11 Oct 2018
  17. 17.
    Han W, Eckschlager A, Böhm HJ (2001) The effects of three-dimensional multi-particle arrangements on the mechanical behavior and damage initiation of particle-reinforced MMCs. Compos Sci Technol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Böhm HJ, Han W (2001) Comparisons between three-dimensional and two-dimensional multi-particle unit cell models for particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eckschlager A, Han W, Böhm HJ (2002) A unit cell model for brittle fracture of particles embedded in a ductile matrix. Comput Mater Sci. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Segurado J, Gonzalez C, LLorca J (2003) A numerical investigation of the effect of particle clustering on the mechanical properties of composites. Acta Mater. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Qian Z, Garboczi EJ, Ye G, Schlangen E (2016) Anm: a geometrical model for the composite structure of mortar and concrete using real shape particles. MaterStruct 49:149–158Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Böhm HJ, Eckschlager A, Han W (2002) Multi-inclusion unit cell models for metal matrix composites with randomly oriented discontinuous reinforcements. Comp Mater Sci. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Atkins SL, Gibeling JC (1995) A finite element model of the effects of primary creep in an Al-SiC metal matrix composite. Metall Mater Trans A. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fritzen F, Böhlke T (2011) Periodic three-dimensional mesh generation for particle reinforced composites with application to metal matrix composites. Int J Solids Struct. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bagi K (1993) A quasi-static numerical model for micro-level analysis of granular assemblies. Mech Mater. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hitti K, Laure P, Coupez T, Silva L, Bernacki M (2012) Precise generation of complex statistical Representative Volume Elements (RVEs) in a finite element context. Comp Mater Sci. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Buryachenko VA, Jackson T, Amadio G (2012) Modeling of random bimodal structures of composites (application to solid propellant): I. simulation of random packs. Comput Model Eng Sci 85(5):379–416Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jia X, Williams RA (1001) A packing algorithm for particles of arbitrary shape. Powder Technol 120:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Burtseva L, Salas BV, Romero R, Werner F (2016) Recent advances on modelling of structures of multi-component mixtures using a sphere packing approach. Int J Nanotech. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Woodcock NH, Naylor MA (1983) Randomness testing in threedimensional orientation data. J Struct Geol 5:539–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Home of Bullet and PyBullet: physics simulation for games, visual effects, robotics and reinforcement learning. Accessed 11 Oct 2018
  32. 32.
    Smirnov SV, Konovalov AV, Myasnikova MV, Khalevitsky YV, Smirnov AS, Igumnov AS (2016) A hierarchial modeling of stress-strain state of multiphase materialsubjected to uniaxial loading. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol. 1785.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Institute of Engineering Science, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences” (IES UB RAS)EkaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations