Evaluating unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soils stabilized with geopolymer: a computational intelligence approach
- 152 Downloads
Soil stabilization using geopolymers is a new technique for improvement of weak cohesive soils. Evaluating behavior of improved soils requires an initial estimation of strength parameters. In this study, extensive experimental results on geopolymer-stabilized soil specimens were collected and analyzed. A model was then developed using group method of data handling (GMDH) and employing particle-swarm optimization algorithm to estimate the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of stabilized cohesive soils using geopolymers. Type of additives and their compositions as well as soil characteristics were taken as the influential parameters on the UCS of soil specimens. Subsequently, sensitivity analysis was carried out to verify the performance of the proposed UCS model. Finally, the developed GMDH-based model was compared with artificial neural network model to predict unconfined compressive strength of stabilized soils. The results clearly illustrate the reasonable accuracy of the developed computational Intelligence-based model for estimating the unconfined compressive strength of geopolymer-stabilized cohesive soils.
KeywordsSoil stabilization Cohesive soil Geopolymer Unconfined compressive strength Computational intelligence
This research was supported by the Basic Research Project of the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) funded by the Minister of Science, ICT and Future Planning of Korea. The support of the research deputy of Shahrekord University (grant number 95GRN1M39422) is also acknowledged.
- 1.Javdanian H, Haddad A, Mehrzad B (2012) Interference effect on bearing capacity of multiple shallow foundations supported by geosynthetic-reinforced sand. In: 5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics, 13 December, Bangkok, ThailandGoogle Scholar
- 4.Javdanian H, Haddad A, Mehrzad B (2012) Experimental and numerical investigation of the bearing capacity of adjacent footings on reinforced soil. Electron J Geotech Eng 17(R):2597–2617Google Scholar
- 5.Javdanian H, Hamedi A, Ayoubi H (2012) Interference effect on bearing capacity of shallow foundations constructed on geosynthetic-reinforced soil. In: 9th International Congress on Civil Engineering, 8 May, IsfahanGoogle Scholar
- 9.Javdanian H (2017) The effect of geopolymerization on the unconfined compressive strength of stabilized fine-grained soils. Int J Eng Trans B Appl 30(11):1673–1680Google Scholar
- 11.Santoni RL, Tingle JS, Webster SL (2003) Stabilization of silty sand with non-traditional additives, transportation research record 1787. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp 33–41Google Scholar
- 17.Yaolin Y, Cheng L, Songyu L (2014) Alkali-activated ground-granulated blast furnace slag for stabilization of marine soft clay. J Mater Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001100:04014146 Google Scholar
- 18.Jafarian Y, Haddad A, Javdanian H (2014) Predictive model for normalized shear modulus of cohesive soils. Acta Geodyn Geomater 11(1):89–100Google Scholar
- 19.Javdanian H, Haddad A, Jafarian A (2015) Evaluation of dynamic behavior of fine-grained soils using group method of data handling. Transp Infrastruct Eng 1(3):77–92Google Scholar
- 40.IS: 2720 (1991). Determination of unconfined compressive strength. (Part 10) Second RevisionGoogle Scholar
- 42.Najafzadeh M, Azamathulla HM (2013) Neuro-fuzzy GMDH systems to predict the scour pile groups due to waves. J Comput Civil Eng. 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000376Google Scholar