Advertisement

3D prediction of tunneling-induced ground movements based on a hybrid ANN and empirical methods

  • M. HajihassaniEmail author
  • R. Kalatehjari
  • A. Marto
  • H. Mohamad
  • M. Khosrotash
Original Article

Abstract

Tunnel construction in urban areas causes ground displacement which may distort and damage overlying buildings and municipal utilities. It is therefore extremely important to predict tunneling-induced ground movements in tunneling projects. To predict the tunneling-induced ground movements, artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been used as flexible non-linear approximation functions. These methods, however, have significant limitations that decrease their accuracy and applicability. To overcome these problems, the use of optimization algorithms to train ANNs is of advantage. In this paper, a hybrid particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm-based ANN is developed to predict the maximum surface settlement and inflection points in transverse and longitudinal directions. Subsequently, the transverse and longitudinal troughs were obtained by means of empirical equations and 3D surface settlement troughs were ploted. For this purpose, extensive data consisting of measured settlements from 123 settlement markers, geotechnical properties and tunneling parameters were collected from the Karaj Urban Railway Project in Iran. The optimum values of PSO parameters were determined with the help of sensitivity analysis. On the other hand, to find the optimal architecture of the network, trial-and-error method was used. The final hybrid model including eight inputs, a hidden layer and three outputs was used to predict transverse and longitudinal tunneling-induced ground movements. The results demonstrated that the proposed model can very accurately predict three-dimensional ground movements induced by tunneling.

Keywords

Tunneling Prediction Surface settlement Ground movements Hybrid ANN 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Peck RB (1969) Deep excavations and tunnelling in soft ground. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, State of the art volume, Mexico City, pp 225–290Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Attewell PB, Woodman JP (1982) Predicting the dynamics of ground settlement and its derivatives caused by tunnelling in soils. Ground Eng 15(8):13–22, 36Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Park KH (2004) Elastic solution for tunnelling-induced ground movements in clays. ASCE Int J Geomech 4(4):310–318MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhao C, Lavasan AA, Barciaga T, Kämper C, Mark P, Schanz T (2017) Prediction of tunnel lining forces and deformations using analytical and numerical solutions. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 64:164–176Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang HN, Chen XP, Jiang MJ, Song F, Wu L (2018) The analytical predictions on displacement and stress around shallow tunnels subjected to surcharge loadings. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 71:403–427Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu H, Cai C, Bobet A, Zhao X, Yuan Y (2019) Analytical solution for longitudinal bending stiffness of shield tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 83:27–34Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee KM, Rowe RK, Lo KY (1992) Subsidence owing to tunnelling I: estimating the gap parameter. Can Geotech J 29:929–940Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mroueh H, Shahrour I (2003) A full 3-D finite element analysis of tunneling–adjacent structures interaction. Comput Geotech 30(3):245–253Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Namazi E, Mohamad H, Jorat ME, Hajihassani M (2011) Investigation on the effects of twin tunnel excavations beneath a road underpass. Electron J Geotech Eng 16(1):1–8Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ahmed M, Iskander M (2011) Analysis of tunnelling-induced ground movements using transparent soil models. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 137:525–535Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Divall S, Goodey RJ (2012) Apparatus for centrifuge modelling of sequential twin-tunnel construction. Int J Phys Model Geotech 12(3):102–111Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    He C, Feng K, Fang Y, Jiang YC (2012) Surface settlement caused by twin-parallel shield tunnelling in sandy cobble strata. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A (Appl Phys Eng) 13(11):858–869Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sun X, Chen F, Miao C, Song P, Li G, Zhao C, Xia X (2018) Physical modeling of deformation failure mechanism of surrounding rocks for the deep-buried tunnel in soft rock strata during the excavation. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 74:247–261Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meguid MA, Saada O, Nunes MA, Mattar J (2008) Physical modeling of tunnels in soft ground: a review. Tunnelling Underground Space Technol 23:185–198Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Neaupane KM, Adhikari NR (2006) Prediction of tunnelling-induced ground movement with the multi-layer perceptron. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 21:151–159Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Santos OJ Jr, Celestino TB (2008) Artificial neural networks of Sao Paulo subway tunnel settlement data. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 23:481–491Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boubou R, Emerilault F, Kastner R (2010) Artificial neural network application for the prediction of ground surface movements induced by shield tunnelling. Can Geotech J 47:1214–1233Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Suwansawat S, Einstein HH (2006) Artificial neural networks for predicting the maximum surface settlement caused by EPB shield tunneling. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 21(2):133–150Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gori M. Tesi A (1992) On the problem of local minima in backpropagation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14(1):76–86Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kröse B, Smagt PVD (1996) An introduction to neural networks. The University of Amsterdam, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Priddy KL, Keller PE (2005) Artificial neural networks: an introduction. In: Bellingham, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen XL, Fu JP, Yao JL, Gan JF (2018) Prediction of shear strength for squat RC walls using a hybrid ANN–PSO model. Eng Comput 34(2):367–383Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hasanipanah M, Shahnazar A, Bakhshandeh Amnieh H, Jahed Armaghani D (2017) Prediction of air-overpressure caused by mine blasting using a new hybrid PSO-SVR model. Eng Comput 33(1):23–31Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gaur S, Ch S, Graillot D, Chahar BR, Kumar DN (2013) Application of artificial neural networks and particle swarm optimization for the management of groundwater resources. Water Resour Manag 27(3):927–941Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moosazadeh S, Namazi E, Aghababaei H, Marto A, Mohamad H, Hajihassani M (2018) Prediction of building damage induced by tunnelling through an optimized artificial neural network. Eng Comput 2018:1–13Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hajihassani M, Jahed Armaghani D, Kalatehjari R (2018) Applications of particle swarm optimization in geotechnical engineering: a comprehensive review. Geotech Geol Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0356-z Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5:115–133MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosenblatt F (1959) The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol Rev 65:386–408Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by backpropagation errors. Nature 323:533–536zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hopfield JJ, Tank DW (1986) Computing with neural circuits—a model. Science 233:625–633Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jain AK, Mao J, Mohiuddin KM (1996) Artificial neural networks: a tutorial. Computer 29(3):31–44Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE international conference on neural networks, Perth, Australia, pp 1942–1948Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shi Y, Eberhart RC (1998) A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: Proceedings of IEEE international congress on evolutionary computation, pp 69–73Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hajihassani M, Jahed Armaghani DJ, Sohaei H, Mohamad ET, Marto A (2014) Prediction of airblast-overpressure induced by blasting using a hybrid artificial neural network and particle swarm optimization. Appl Acoust 80:57–67Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Poli R, Kennedy J, Blackwell T (2007) Particle swarm optimization an overview. Swarm Intell 1:33–57Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bansal JC, Singh PK, Saraswat M, Verma A, Jadon SS, Abraham A (2011) Inertia weight strategies in particle swarm optimization. In: Third World congress on nature biologically inspired computing IEEE, pp 640–647Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Clerc M, Kennedy J (2002) The particle swarm explosion, stability, and convergence in a multi-dimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 6(1):58–73Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Diamantidis NA, Karlis D, Giakoumakis EA (2000) Unsupervised stratification of cross validation for accuracy estimation. Artif Intell 116(1):1–16MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mining, Faculty of EngineeringUrmia UniversityUrmiaIran
  2. 2.Built Environment Engineering Department, School of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical SciencesAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand
  3. 3.Malaysia-Japan International Institute of TechnologyUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia Kuala LumpurKuala LumpurMalaysia
  4. 4.Civil and Environmental Engineering DepartmentUniversiti Teknologi PETRONASPerakMalaysia
  5. 5.Tunnel Rod Construction Consulting Engineers Ins.TehranIran

Personalised recommendations