Statistical Papers

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 99–114 | Cite as

Optimal design of inspection times for interval censoring

  • Nadja MalevichEmail author
  • Christine H. Müller
Regular Article


We treat optimal equidistant and optimal non-equidistant inspection times for interval censoring of exponential distributions. We provide in particular a new approach for determining the optimal non-equidistant inspection times. The resulting recursive formula is related to a formula for optimal spacing of quantiles for asymptotically best linear estimates based on order statistics and to a formula for optimal cutpoints by the discretisation of continuous random variables. Moreover, we show that by the censoring with the optimal non-equidistant inspection times as well as with optimal equidistant inspection times, there is no loss of information if the number of inspections is converging to infinity. Since optimal equidistant inspection times are easier to calculate and easier to handle in practice, we study the efficiency of optimal equidistant inspection times with respect to optimal non-equidistant inspection times. Moreover, since the optimal inspection times are only locally optimal, we also provide some results concerning maximin efficient designs.


Optimal inspection times Exponential distribution Optimal spacing of quantiles Maximin efficient designs Interval-censored data 



The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the Collaborative Research Center “Statistical Modelling of Nonlinear Dynamic Processes” (SFB 823, B4) of the German Research Foundation (DFG). Additionally, the authors thank the two unknown referees for their helpful remarks and suggestions.


  1. Aggarwala R (2001) Progressive interval censoring: some mathematical results with applications to inference. Commun Stat Theory Methods 30:1921–1935MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahn S, Lim J, Paik MC, Sacco RL, Elkind MS (2018) Cox model with interval-censored covariate in cohort studies. Biom J 60:797–814MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Attia AF, Assar SM (2012) Optimal progressive group-censoring plans for Weibull distribution in presence of cost constraint. Int J Contemp Math Sci 7:1337–1349MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogaerts K, Komarek A, Lesaffre E (2018) Survival analysis with interval-censored data: a practical approach with examples in R, SAS, and BUGS. Interdisciplinary Statistics Series. Chapman & Hall, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng SW (1975) A unified approach to choosing optimum quantiles for the ABLE’s. J Am Stat Assoc 70:155–159CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Dette H, Biedermann S (2003) Robust and efficient designs for the Michaelis–Menten model. J Am Stat Assoc 98:679–686MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Eubank RL (1982) A bibliography for the ABLUE. Technical Report, Southern Methodist University Dallas, TexasGoogle Scholar
  8. Ford I, Torsney B, Wu CFJ (1992) The use of a canonical form in the construction of locally optimal designs for nonlinear problems. J R Stat Soc Series B 54:569–583MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Gao F, Zeng D, Couper D, Lin DY (2018) Semiparametric regression analysis of multiple right- and interval-censored events. J Am Stat Assoc.
  10. Gunduz N, Torsney B (2006) Some advances in optimal designs in contingent valuation studies. J Stat Plan Inference 136:1153–1165MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Inoue LYT, Parmigiani G (2002) Designing follow-up times. J Am Stat Assoc 97:847–858MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Islam A, Ahmad N (1994) Optimal design of accelerated life tests for the Weibull distribution under periodic inspection and Type I censoring. Microelectron Reliabil 34:1459–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ismail AA (2015) Optimum partially accelerated life test plans with progressively Type I interval-censored data. Seq Anal 34:135–147MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Kansteiner M, Biermann D, Dagge M, Müller C, Ferreira M, Tillmann W (2017) Statistical evaluation of the wear behaviour of diamond impregnated tools used for the core drilling of concrete. In: Proceedings of Euro PM2017, Europe’s annual powder metallurgy congress and exhibition, Milan, 1–5 October 2017Google Scholar
  15. Kansteiner M, Biermann D, Malevich N, Horn M, Müller C, Ferreira M, Tillmann W (2017) Analysis of the wear behaviour of diamond impregnated tools used for the core drilling of concrete with statistical lifetime prediction. In: Proceedings of Euro PM2018, Europe’s annual powder metallurgy congress and exhibition, Bilbao, 14–18 October 2018Google Scholar
  16. Kulldorff G (1961) Contributions to the theory of estimation from grouped and partially grouped samples. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Kulldorff G (1973) A note on the optimum spacing of sample quantiles from the six extreme value distributions. Ann Stat 1:562–567MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin C-T, Wu SJS, Balakrishnan N (2009) Planning life tests with progressively Type-I interval censored data from the lognormal distribution. J Stat Plan Inference 139:54–61MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Lui KJ (1993) Sample size determination for cohort studies under an exponential covariate model with grouped data. Biometrics 49:773–778MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Malevich N, Müller CH, Kansteiner M, Biermann D, Ferreira M, Tillmann W (2018) Statistical analysis of the lifetime of diamond impregnated tools for core drilling of concrete. SubmittedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson W (1977) Optimum demonstration tests for grouped inspection data from an exponential distribution. IEEE Trans Reliab 26:226–231CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Nguyen T, Torsney B (2007) Optimal cutpoint determination: the case of one point design. In: López-Fidalgo J, Rodríguez-Díaz J, Torsney B (eds) mODa 8: Advances in model-oriented design and analysis. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ogawa J (1998) Optimal spacing of the selected sample quantiles for the joint estimation of the location and scale parameters of a symmetric distribution. J Stat Plan Inference 70:345–360MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Park S (2006) Conditional optimal spacing in exponential distribution. Lifetime Data Anal 12:523–530MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Parmigiani G (1998) Designing observation times for interval censored data. Sankyha A 60:446–458MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Raab GM, Davies JA, Salter AB (2004) Designing follow-up intervals. Statist Med 23:3125–3137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saleh AKME (1964) On the estimation of the parameters of exponential distribution based on optimum order statistics in censored samples. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Western Ontario, London, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  28. Saleh AKME (1966) Estimation of the parameters of the exponential distribution based on optimum order statistics in censored samples. Ann Math Statist 37:1717–1735MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Sarhan AE, Greenberg BG, Ogawa J (1963) Simplified estimates for the exponential distribution. Ann Math Statist 34:102–116MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmidt M, Schwabe R (2015) Optimal cutpoints for random observations. Statistics 49:1366–1381MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Seo SK, Yum BJ (1991) Accelerated life test plans under intermittent inspection and Type I censoring: the case of Weibull failure distribution. Naval Res Logist 38:1–22MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Shapiro SS, Gulati S (1996) Selecting failure monitoring times for an exponential life distribution. J Qual Technol 28:429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sun J (2006) The statistical analysis of interval-censored failure time data. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Tsai T-R, Lin C-W (2010) Acceptance sampling plans under progressive interval censoring with likelihood ratio. Stat Papers 51:259–271MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang S, Wang C, Wang P, Sun J (2018) Semiparametric analysis of the additive hazards model with informatively interval-censored failure time data. Comput Stat Data Anal 125:1–9MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Wei D, Bau JJ (1987) Some optimal designs for grouped data in reliability demonstration tests. IEEE Trans Reliab 36:600–604CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Wei D, Shau CK (1987) Fitting and optimal grouping on gamma reliability data. IEEE Trans Reliab 36:595–599CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Wolfram Research, Inc. (2017) Mathematica, Version 11.2, Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  39. Wu S-J, Huang S-R (2010) Optimal progressive group-censoring plans for exponential distribution in presence of cost constraint. Stat Papers 51:431–443MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang C, Tse S-K (2005) Planning accelerated life tests under progressive Type I interval censoring with random removals. Commun Stat Simul Comput 34:1001–1025MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Yum BJ, Choi SC (1989) Optimal design of accelerated life tests under periodic inspection. Naval Res Logist 36:779–795MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsTU Dortmund UniversityDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations