Advertisement

Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 205, Issue 5, pp 699–706 | Cite as

Ocellar structure of African and Australian desert ants

  • Bhavana Penmetcha
  • Yuri Ogawa
  • Willi A. Ribi
  • Ajay NarendraEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Few walking insects possess simple eyes known as the ocelli. The role of the ocelli in walking insects such as ants has been less explored. Physiological and behavioural evidence in the desert ant, Cataglyphis bicolor, indicates that ocellar receptors are polarisation sensitive and are used to derive compass information from the pattern of polarised skylight. The ability to detect polarised skylight can also be inferred from the structure and the organisation of the ocellar retina. However, the functional anatomy of the desert ant ocelli has not been investigated. Here we characterised the anatomical organisation of the ocelli in three species of desert ants. The two congeneric species of Cataglyphis we studied had a fused rhabdom, but differed in their organisation of the retina. In Cataglyphis bicolor, each retinula cell contributed microvilli in one orientation enabling them to compare e-vector intensities. In Cataglyphis fortis, some retinula cells contributed microvilli in more than one orientation, indicating that not all cells are polarisation sensitive. The desert ant Melophorus bagoti had an unusual ocellar retina with a hexagonal or pentagonal rhabdomere arrangement forming an open rhabdom. Each retinula cell contributed microvilli in more than one orientation, making them unlikely to be polarisation detectors.

Keywords

Visual system Ants Cataglyphis Melophorus Polarisation sensitivity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Wolfgang Rössler for loaning us samples of Cataglyphis ants and to Sebastian Schwarz for providing us samples of Melophorus bagoti. We acknowledge the microscopy facilities at Macquarie University, The Australian National University, and at the MPI of Tübingen. Working with these ants requires no ethics approval in Australia, but we treated them with care. We thank financial support from the ANU endowment fund to Willi Ribi, the Australian Research Council (FT140100221, DP150101172) and the Hermon Slade Foundation (HSF17/08).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.

References

  1. Berry RP, Wcislo WT, Warrant EJ (2011) Ocellar adaptations for dim light vision in a nocturnal bee. J Exp Biol 214:1283–1293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dreyer D, Frost B, Mouritsen H et al (2018) The Earth’s magnetic field and visual landmarks steer migratory flight behavior in the nocturnal Australian Bogong moth. Curr Biol 28:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fent K (1986) Polarized skylight orientation in the desert ant Cataglyphis. J Comp Physiol A 158:145–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fent K, Wehner R (1985) Ocelli: a celestial compass in the desert ant Cataglyphis. Science 228:192–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Geiser FX, Labhart T (1982) Electrophysiological investigation on the ocellar retina of the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Verhandlungen der Dtsch Zool Gesellschaft 75:307Google Scholar
  6. Graham P, Fauria K, Collett TS (2003) The influence of beacon-aiming on the routes of wood ants. J Exp Biol 206:535–541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Henze MJ, Dannenhauer K, Kohler M, Labhart T, Gesemann M (2012) Opsin evolution and expression in arthropod compound eyes and ocelli: insights from the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. BMC Evol Biol 12:163–178CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Honkanen A, Adden A, da Silva Freitas J, Heinze S (2019) The insect central complex and the neural basis of navigational strategies. J Exp Biol 222:jeb188854.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.188854 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Labhart T (1986) The electrophysiology of photoreceptors in different eye regions of the desert ant, Cataglyphis bicolor. J Comp Physiol A 158:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00614514 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Labhart T, Meyer EP (1999) Detectors for polarized skylight in insects: a survey of ommatidial specializations in the dorsal rim area of the compound eye. Microsc Res Tech 47:368–379CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mote M, Wehner R (1980) Functional characteristics of photoreceptors in the compound eye and ocellus of the desert ant, Cataglyphis bicolor. J Comp Physiol A 137:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Narendra A, Ribi WA (2017) Ocellar structure is driven by the mode of locomotion and activity time in Myrmecia ants. J Exp Biol 220:4383–4390.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.159392 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Narendra A, Reid SF, Greiner B et al (2011) Caste-specific visual adaptations to distinct daily activity schedules in Australian Myrmecia ants. Proc R Soc B 278:1141–1149.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1378 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Narendra A, Ramirez-Esquivel F, Ribi WA (2016) Compound eye and ocellar structure for walking and flying modes of locomotion in the Australian ant, Camponotus consobrinus. Sci Rep 6:22331.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22331 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Ogawa Y, Ribi WA, Zeil J, Hemmi JM (2017) Regional differences in the preferred e-vector orientation of honeybee ocellar photoreceptors. J Exp Biol 220:1701–1708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ribi WA, Zeil J (2017) Three-dimensional visualization of ocellar interneurons of the orchid bee Euglossa imperialis using micro X-ray computed tomography. J Comp Neurol 525:3581–3595CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ribi WA, Zeil J (2018) Diversity and common themes in the organization of ocelli in Hymenoptera, Odonata and Diptera. J Comp Physiol A 204:505–517.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-018-1258-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ribi WA, Warrant EJ, Zeil J (2011) The organization of honeybee ocelli: regional specializations and rhabdom arrangements. Arthropod Struct Dev 40:509–520.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2011.06.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rossel S, Wehner RD (1984) Celestial orientation in bees: the use of spectral cues. J Comp Physiol A 155:605–613.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schwarz S, Albert L, Wystrach A, Cheng K (2011a) Ocelli contribute to the encoding of celestial compass information in the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. J Exp Biol 214:901–906.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.049262 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Schwarz S, Wystrach A, Cheng K (2011b) A new navigational mechanism mediated by ant ocelli. Biol Lett 7:856–858.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0489 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Snodgrass RE (1993) Principles of insect morphology. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  23. Somanathan H, Kelber A, Borges RM et al (2009) Visual ecology of Indian carpenter bees II: adaptations of eyes and ocelli to nocturnal and diurnal lifestyles. J Comp Physiol A 195:571–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Steck K (2012) Just follow your nose: homing by olfactory cues in ants. Curr Opin Neurobiol 22:231–235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2011.10.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Taylor GJ, Ribi WA, Bech M et al (2016) The dual function of Orchid bee ocelli as revealed by X-ray microtomography. Curr Biol 26:1319–1324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.038 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Toh Y, Tominaga Y, Kuwabara M (1971) The fine structure of the dorsal ocellus of the Fleshfly. J Electron Microsc 20:56–66Google Scholar
  27. Uehara A, Toh Y, Tateda H (1977) Fine structure of the eyes of orb-weavers Argiope amoena L. Koch (Araneae: Argiopidae) 1. The anteromedial eyes. Cell Tissue Res 182:81–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. van Kleef J, James AC, Stange G (2005) A spatiotemporal white noise analysis of photoreceptor responses to UV and green light in the dragonfly median ocellus. J Gen Physiol 126:481–497.  https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200509319 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Warrant EJ, Kelber A, Wallén R, Wcislo W (2006) Ocellar optics in nocturnal and diurnal bees and wasps. Arthropod Struct Dev 35:293–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wehner R (2009) The architecture of the desert ant’s navigational toolkit. Myrmecol News 12:85–96Google Scholar
  31. Wellington WG (1974) Bumblebee ocelli and navigation at dusk. Science 183:550–551.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.183.4124.550 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wunderer H, Weber G, Seifert P (1988) The fine structure of the dorsal ocelli in the male bibionid fly. Tissue Cell 20:145–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Zeil J, Ribi WA, Narendra A (2014) Polarisation vision in ants, bees and wasps. In: Horváth G (ed) Polarized light and polarization vision in animal sciences. Springer, Berlin, pp 41–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Research School of BiologyThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations