Advertisement

Where Should I Submit My Work for Publication? An Asymmetrical Classification Model to Optimize Choice

  • A. Ferrer-Sapena
  • J. M. Calabuig
  • L. M. García Raffi
  • E. A. Sánchez PérezEmail author
Article

Abstract

Choosing a journal to publish a work is a task that involves many variables. Usually, the authors’ experience allows them to classify journals into categories, according to their suitability and the characteristics of the article. However, there are certain aspects in the choice that are probabilistic in nature, whose modelling may provide some help. Suppose an author has to choose a journal from a preference list to publish an article. The researcher is interested in publishing the paper in a journal with a rank number less than or equal to k. For this purpose, a simple classification model is presented in order to choose the best journal from the list, from which some fundamental consequences can be deduced and simple rules derived. For example, if the list contains 100 journals and is ordered using 2-year impact factor, the rule “send to the journal at the k − 10 position” is adequate.

Keywords

Scientific publication Best choice of journal Model Asymmetric distribution 

Notes

References

  1. Althouse, B.M., West, J.D., Bergstrom, C.T., Bergstrom, T. (2009). Differences in impact factor across fields and over time. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 27–34.Google Scholar
  2. Black, S. (2012). How much do core journals change over a decade? Library Resources and Technical Services, 56, 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradshaw, C.J., & Brook, B.W. (2016). How to rank journals. PloS One, 11 (3), e0149852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ferrer-Sapena, A., Diaz-Novillo, S., Sánchez-Pérez, E.A. (2017). Measuring time-dynamics and time-stability of Journal Rankings in Mathematics and Physics by Means of Fractional p-Variations. Publications, 5(3), 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferrer-Sapena, A., Sánchez-Pérez, E.A., González, L.M., Peset, F., Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2015). Mathematical properties of weighted impact factors based on measures of prestige of the citing journals. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2089–2108.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferrer-Sapena, A., Sánchez-Pérez, E.A., González, L.M., Peset, F., Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2016). The impact factor as a measuring tool of the prestige of the journals in research assessment in mathematics. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 306–314.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Gastel, B., & Day, R.A. (2016). How to write and publish a scientific paper. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  8. Gibbs, A. (2016). Improving publication: advice for busy higher education academics. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(3), 255–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grabisch, M.M., Marichal, J.L., Mesiar, R., Pap, E. (2009). Aggregation functions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Haghdoost, A., Zare, M., Bazrafshan, A. (2014). How variable are the journal impact measures?. Online Information Review, 38, 723–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hol, E.M. (2013). Empirical studies on volatility in international stock markets. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Kelly, J.L. Jr. (2011). A new interpretation of information rate. Manuscript. Reprinted in: The Kelly capital growth investment criterion: theory and practice (pp. 25–34).Google Scholar
  13. Klement, E.P., Mesiar, R., Pap, E. (2000). Triangular norms. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Klement, E.P., Mesiar, R., Pap, E. (2001). Uniform approximation of associative copulas by strict and non-strict copulas. Illinois Journal of Mathematics, 45 (4), 1393–1400.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Lawrence, P.A. (2003). The politics of publication. Nature, 422(6929), 259–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lu, J., Wu, D., Mao, M., Wang, W., Zhang, G. (2015). Recommender system application developments: a survey. Decision Support Systems, 74, 12–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mansilla, R., Köppen, E., Cocho, G., Miramontes, P. (2007). On the behavior of journal impact factor rank-order distribution. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murtagh, F., Orlov, M., Mirkin, B. (2018). Qualitative judgement of research impact: Domain taxonomy as a fundamental framework for judgement of the quality of research. Journal of Classification, 35, 5–28.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Neff, B.D., & Olden, J.D. (2010). Not so fast: inflation in impact factors contributes to apparent improvements in journal quality. BioScience, 60(6), 455–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nelsen, R.B. (1999). An introduction to copulas. New York: Springer.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Pajić, D. (2015). On the stability of citation-based journal rankings. Journal of Informetric, 9, 990–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423. Reprinted in: ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 5(1)(2001), 3-55.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Xu, H., Martin, E., Mahidadia, A. (2014). Contents and time sensitive document ranking of scientific literature. Journal of Informetrics, 8, 546–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Classification Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Universitario de Matemática Pura y AplicadaUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations