Advertisement

Power index rankings in bicameral legislatures and the US legislative system

  • Victoria PowersEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In this paper we study rankings induced by power indices of players in simple game models of bicameral legislatures. For a bicameral legislature where bills are passed with a simple majority vote in each house we give a condition involving the size of each chamber which guarantees that a member of the smaller house has more power than a member of the larger house, regardless of the power index used. The only case for which this does not apply is when the smaller house has an odd number of players, the larger house has an even number of players, and the larger house is less than twice the size of the smaller house. We explore what can happen in this exceptional case. These results generalize to multi-cameral legislatures. Using a standard model of the US legislative system as a simple game, we use our results to study power index rankings of the four types of players—the president, the vice president, senators, and representatives. We prove that a senator is always ranked above a representative and ranked the same as or above the vice president. We also show that the president is always ranked above the other players. We show that for most power index rankings, including the Banzhaf and Shapley–Shubik power indices, the vice president is ranked above a representative, however, there exist power indices ranking a representative above the vice president.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Bruce Reznick for several helpful conversations and to several anonymous referees who provided extensive comments and suggestions that greatly improved the paper.

References

  1. Banzhaf JF (1965) Weighted voting doesn’t work: a mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Rev 19:317–343Google Scholar
  2. Brams S, Affuso P, Kilgour DM (1989) Presidential power: a game-theoretic analysis. In: Brace P, Harrington C, King G (eds) The presidency in American politics. New York University Press, New York, pp 55–74Google Scholar
  3. Carreras F, Freixas J (2008) On ordinal equivalence of power measures given by regular semivalues. Math Soc Sci 55:221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dubey P, Neyman P, Weber RJ (1981) Value theory without efficiency. Math Oper Res 6:122–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Saari D, Sieberg K (2000) Some surprising properties of power indices. Games Econ Behav 36:241–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Shapley LS, Shubik M (1954) A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. Am Polit Sci Rev 48:787–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Taylor A, Pacelli A (2008) Mathematics and politics. Strategy, voting, power and proof, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Weber RJ (1979) Subjectivity in the valuation of games, game theory and related topics. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 129–136Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations