Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 61:8 | Cite as

Fast pressure-sensitive paint for understanding complex flows: from regular to harsh environments

  • Di Peng
  • Yingzheng LiuEmail author
Review Article
  • 208 Downloads

Abstract

This review summarizes state-of-the-art knowledge on fast-responding pressure-sensitive paint (fast PSP), which has evolved into a powerful experimental tool for studying complex flow problems. As the formulation of porous paint with kilohertz response is now well established, full-field pressure measurements with high spatial and temporal resolution have been achieved on both stationary and moving targets. Recent studies have significantly advanced every aspect of this technology, including paint development, theoretical modeling, system integration and data processing. Novel paint formulations with superior sensing properties and additional functions for multi-physical measurements are being continually developed. The dynamic response mechanism is better understood through analysis and modeling considering the processes of photoluminescence, gas diffusion and light transmission. More importantly, applications of fast PSP are being expanded from regular wind-tunnel tests to more challenging conditions featuring hypervelocity, fast rotation and high temperature. Interdisciplinary research has played a key role in these development processes, and will remain vital for future breakthroughs in PSP technology.

Graphic abstract

List of symbols

A

Coefficient of Stern–Volmer equation

B

Coefficient of Stern–Volmer equation

Dm

Oxygen diffusion coefficient in PSP binder

dfr

Fractal dimension of the porous binder

h

Paint thickness

I

Intensity

I0

Intensity at the beginning of luminescent decay

IG1

Intensity of gate 1

IG2

Intensity of gate 2

Iref

Intensity at reference condition

P

Pressure

Pref

Pressure at reference condition

Sa

Surface roughness

T

Temperature

T0

Stagnation temperature

Tref

Temperature at reference condition

t

Time

td

Test duration

ΔT

Temperature change

τ

Luminescent lifetime

τd

Time constant of oxygen diffusion

τref

Luminescent lifetime at reference condition

ω

Angular velocity

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC No. 11725209 and No. 11872038).

References

  1. Ali MY, Pandey A, Gregory JW (2016) Dynamic mode decomposition of fast pressure sensitive paint data. Sensors.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s16060862 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asai K, Yorita D (2011) Unsteady PSP measurement in low-speed flow—overview of recent advancement at Tohoku University. In: 49th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, AIAA 2011-847Google Scholar
  3. Basu BJ, Anandan C, Rajam KS (2003) Study of the mechanism of degradation of pyrene-based pressure sensitive paints. Sens Actuators B Chem 94:257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basu BJ, Vasantharajan N, Raju C (2009) A novel pyrene-based binary pressure sensitive paint with low temperature coefficient and improved stability. Sens Actuators B-Chem 138:283–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck WH, Klein C, Henne U, Sachs W, Schramm JM, Wagner A, Hannemann K, Gawehn T, Gülhan A (2015) Application of temperature and pressure sensitive paints to DLR hypersonic facilities: “lessons learned”. In: 53rd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA-2015-0023Google Scholar
  6. Bell JH (2001) Accuracy limitations of lifetime-based pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) measurements. In: 19th international congress on instrumentation in aerospace simulation facilities,  https://doi.org/10.1109/iciasf.2001.960231
  7. Bitter M, Hara T, Hain R, Yorita D, Asai K, Kahler CJ (2012) Characterization of pressure dynamics in an axisymmetric separating/reattaching flow using fast-responding pressure-sensitive paint. Exp Fluids 53:1737–1749.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-012-1380-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brubach J, Dreizler A, Janicka J (2007) Gas compositional and pressure effects on thermographic phosphor thermometry. Meas Sci Technol 18:764–770.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/18/3/028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chin D, Sealy W, Granlund K, Hayashi T, Sakaue H (2017) Unsteady PSP measurements on a cylinder translating out from a supersonic cavity. In: 47th AIAA fluid dynamics conference, AIAA-2017-3468Google Scholar
  10. Claucherty S, Sakaue H (2019) Pyrene based polymer ceramic pressure-sensitive paint for aerodynamic application. In: AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, AIAA-2019-0020Google Scholar
  11. Crafton J, Fonov S, Forlines R, Palluconi S (2013) Development of pressure-sensitive paint systems for low speed flows and large wind tunnels. In: 51st AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA 2013-0482.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-482
  12. Crafton J, Forlines A, Palluconi S, Hsu K, Carter C, Gruber M (2015) Investigation of transverse jet injections in a supersonic crossflow using fast-responding pressure-sensitive paint. Exp Fluids 56:27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1877-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis T, Edstrand A, Alvi F, Cattafesta L, Yorita D, Asai K (2015) Investigation of impinging jet resonant modes using unsteady pressure-sensitive paint measurements. Exp Fluids 56:101.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-1976-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dickey EC, Varghese OK, Ong KG, Gong D, Paulose M, Grimes CA (2002) Room temperature ammonia and humidity sensing using highly ordered nanoporous alumina films. Sensors 2:91–110.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s20300091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Disotell KJ, Peng D, Juliano TJ, Gregory JW, Crafton JW, Komerath NM (2014) Single-shot temperature- and pressure-sensitive paint measurements on an unsteady helicopter blade. Exp Fluids 55:1671.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1671-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Disotell KJ, Nikoueeyan P, Naughton JW, Gregory JW (2016) Global surface pressure measurements of static and dynamic stall on a wind turbine airfoil at low Reynolds number. Exp Fluids 57:82.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-016-2175-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Egami Y, Fujii K, Takagi T, Matsuda Y, Yamaguchi H, Niimi T (2013) Reduction of temperature effects in pressure-sensitive paint measurements. AIAA J 51:1779–1782.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Egami Y, Ueyama J, Furukawa S, Kameya T, Matsuda Y, Yamaguchi H, Niimi T (2015) Development of fast response bi-luminophore pressure-sensitive paint by means of an inkjet printing technique. Meas Sci Technol 26(064004):1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/26/6/064004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Egami Y, Konishi S, Sato Y, Matsuda Y (2019a) Effects of solvents for luminophore on dynamic and static characteristics of sprayable polymer/ceramic pressure-sensitive paint. Sens Actuators A-Phys 286:188–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.12.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Egami Y, Sato Y, Konihsi S (2019b) Development of sprayable pressure sensitive paint with a response time of less than 10 μs. AIAA J 57:2198–2203.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J057434 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fang S, Long SR, Disotell KJ, Gregory JW, Semmelmayer FC, Guyton RW (2012) Comparison of unsteady pressure-sensitive paint measurement techniques. AIAA J 50:209–222.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feist JP, Heyes AL, Seedfeldt S (2003) Oxygen quenching of phosphorescence from thermographic phosphors. Meas Sci Technol 14:17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fischer LH, Karakus C, Meier RJ, Risch N, Wolfbeis OS, Holder E, Schaferling M (2012) Referenced dual pressure- and temperature-sensitive paint for digital color camera read out. Chem Eur J 18:15706–15713.  https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201201358 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flaherty W, Reedy TM, Elliott GS, Austin JM, Schmit RF, Crafton J (2014) Investigation of cavity flow using fast-response pressure-sensitive paint. AIAA J 52:2462–2470.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052864 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fujii S, Numata D, Nagai H, Asai K (2013) Development of ultrafast-response anodized-aluminum pressure-sensitive paints. AIAA 2013-0485Google Scholar
  26. Gardner AD, Klein C, Sachs WE, Henne U, Mai H, Richter K (2014) Investigation of three-dimensional dynamic stall on an airfoil using fast-response pressure-sensitive paint. Exp Fluids 55:1807.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1807-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geisler R (2014) A fast double shutter system for CCD image sensors. Meas Sci Technol 25:025404.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/25/2/025404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gordeyev S, De Lucca N, Jumper EJ, Hird K, Juliano TJ, Gregory JW, Thordahl J, Wittich DJ (2014) Comparison of unsteady pressure fields on turrets with different surface features using pressure-sensitive paint. Exp Fluids 55(1661):1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1661-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goss L, Trump D, Sarka B, Lydick L, Baker W (2000) Multi-dimensional time-resolved pressure-sensitive paint techniques: a numerical and experimental comparison. In: 37th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, AIAA-2000-0832.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2000-832
  30. Goßling J, Ahlefeldt T, Mumcu A, Hilfer M (2018) Experimental validation of unsteady pressure-sensitive paint for acoustic applications. In: 5th international conference on experimental fluid mechanicsGoogle Scholar
  31. Gouin S, Gouterman M (2000) Ideality of pressure-sensitive paint II. Effect of annealing on the temperature dependence of the luminescence. J Appl Polym Sci 77:2805–2814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gregory JW, Sullivan JP (2006) Effect of quenching kinetics on unsteady response of pressure-sensitive paint. AIAA J 44:634–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gregory JW, Sakaue H, Sullivan JP (2002) Unsteady Pressure measurements in a turbocharger compressor using porous pressure-sensitive paint. In: Proceedings of the 40th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, AIAA 2002-0084Google Scholar
  34. Gregory JW, Sullivan JP, Wanis S, Komerath NM (2006) Pressure-sensitive paint as a distributed optical microphone array. J Acoust Soc Am 119:251–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gregory JW, Sullivan JP, Raman G, Raghu S (2007) Characterization of the microfluidic oscillator. AIAA J 45:568–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gregory JW, Asai K, Kameda M, Liu T, Sullivan JP (2008) A review of pressure-sensitive paint for high-speed and unsteady aerodynamics. P I Mech Eng G-J Aer 222:249–290.  https://doi.org/10.1243/09544100JAERO243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gregory JW, Kumar P, Peng D, Fonov S, Crafton J, Liu T (2009) Integrated optical measurement techniques for investigations of fluid-structure interactions. In: 39th AIAA Fluid dynamics conference, AIAA 2009-4044Google Scholar
  38. Gregory JW, Sakaue H, Liu T, Sullivan JP (2014a) Fast pressure-sensitive paint for flow and acoustic diagnostics. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 56:303–330.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141304 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. Gregory JW, Disotell KJ, Peng D, Juliano TJ, Crafton J, Komerath NM (2014b) Inverse methods for deblurring pressure-sensitive paint images of rotating surfaces. AIAA J 52:2045–2061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hayashi T, Sakaue H (2017) Dynamic and steady characteristics of polymer-ceramic pressure-sensitive paint with variation in layer thickness. Sensors 17(1125):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s17051125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hayashi T, Houpt A, Hedlund B, Leonov S, Sakaue H (2018) Two-color polymer-ceramic pressure-sensitive paint for transient plasma in M = 2 Airflow. In: 2018 AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA-2018-1028Google Scholar
  42. Holmes JW (1998) Analysis of radiometric, lifetime and fluorescent lifetime imaging for pressure sensitive paint. Aeronaut J 102:189Google Scholar
  43. Hubner JP, Carroll BF, Schanze KS, Ji HF, Holden MS (2001) Temperature- and pressure-sensitive paint measurements in short-duration hypersonic flow. AIAA J 39:654–659.  https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1358 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hyakutake T, Taguchi H, Kato J, Nishide H, Watanabe M (2009) Luminescent multi-layered polymer coating for the simultaneous detection of oxygen pressure and temperature. Macromol Chem Phys 210:1230–1234.  https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.200900176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Iijima Y, Sakaue H (2011) Development of electroluminescence based pressure-sensitive paint system. Rev Sci Instr 82:015107.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3514987 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ishii M, Isokawa H, Miyazaki T, Sakaue H (2017a) Surface state measurement of a free-flight object by motion-capturing method. In: 55th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA-2017-0943Google Scholar
  47. Ishii M, Miyazaki T, Sakaue H (2017b) Uniformity study of two-functional luminescent dyes adsorbed over an anodized aluminum coating for motion-capturing pressure- and temperature-sensitive paint imaging. Sensors 18:26.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jiao L, Peng D, Yu Y, Liu Y, Oshio T, Oouchida S, Kawakubo T, Yakushiji A (2017) Single-shot lifetime-based PSP and TSP measurements on rotating blades—challenges at high RPMs. In: 33rd AIAA aerodynamic measurement technology and ground testing conference, AIAA-2017-3735Google Scholar
  49. Jiao L, Chen Y, Peng D, Liu Y, Gregory JW (2018a) Experimental study of the interaction between rotor wake and a cylinder in Hover. In: 2018 applied aerodynamics conference, AIAA-2018-4214Google Scholar
  50. Jiao L, Peng D, Liu Y (2018b) Dynamic response of polymer ceramic pressure-sensitive paint: improved model considering thickness effect. AIAA J 56:2903–2906.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056778 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Juliano TJ, Kumar P, Peng D, Gregory JW, Crafton J, Fonov S (2011) Single-shot, lifetime-based pressure-sensitive paint for rotating blades. Meas Sci Tech 22:085403.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/22/8/085403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Juliano TJ, Disotell KJ, Gregory JW, Crafton JW, Fonov SD (2012) Motion-deblurred, fast-response pressure-sensitive paint on a rotor in forward flight. Meas Sci Tech 23:045303.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/23/4/045303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kameda M (2012) Effect of luminescence lifetime on the frequency response of fast-response pressure-sensitive paints. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng Ser B 78:1942–1950.  https://doi.org/10.1299/kikaib.78.1942 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kameda M, Tezuka N, Hangai T, Asai K, Nakakita K, Amao Y (2004) Adsorptive pressure-sensitive coatings on porous anodized aluminium. Meas Sci Technol 15:489–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kameda M, Tabei T, Nakakita K, Sakaue H, Asai K (2005) Image measurements of unsteady pressure fluctuation by a pressure-sensitive coating on porous anodized aluminium. Meas Sci Technol 16:2517–2524.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/16/12/017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kameda M, Seki H, Makoshi T, Amao Y, Nakakita K (2012) A fast-response pressure sensor based on a dye-adsorbed silica nanoparticle film. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 171:343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kameda M, Yoshida M, Sekiya T, Nakakita K (2015) Humidity effects in the response of a porous pressure-sensitive paint. Sens Actuators B Chem 208:399–405.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.11.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kameya T, Matsuda Y, Yamaguchi H, Egami Y, Niimi T (2011) Pressure-sensitive paint measurement on co-rotating disks in a hard disk drive. Opt Laser Eng 10:1016Google Scholar
  59. Kameya T, Matsuda Y, Egami Y, Yamaguchi H, Niimi T (2014) Dual luminescent arrays sensor fabricated by inkjet-printing of pressure- and temperature-sensitive paints. Sens Actuators B Chem 190:70–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2013.08.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kautsky H, Hirsch H (1935) Detection of minutest amounts of oxygen by extinction of phosphorescence (in German). Z Anorg Allg Chem 222:126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Klein C, Henne U, Sachs WE, Engler RH, Egami Y, Ondrus V, Beifuss U, Mai H (2007) Application of pressure-sensitive paint for determination of dynamic surface pressures on a rotating 65° delta wing and an oscillating 2D profile in transonic flow. In: 2007 22nd international congress on instrumentation in aerospace simulation facilities, ICIASF, Art. No.: 4380887; CODEN: ICREE.  https://doi.org/10.1109/iciasf.2007.4380887
  62. Klein C, Henne U, Sachs W, Hock S, Falk N, Beifuss U, Ondrus V, Schaber S (2013) Pressure measurement on rotating propeller blades by means of the pressure-sensitive paint lifetime method. In: 51st AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA-2013-0483Google Scholar
  63. Kuriki T, Sakaue H, Imamura O, Suzuki K (2010) Temperature-cancelled AA-PSP for hypersonic compression corner flows. In: 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, AIAA 2010-673Google Scholar
  64. Law KJ, Stuart AM, Zygalakis KC (2015) Data assimilation: a mathematical introduction. e-print arXiv:1506.07825
  65. Li R, Gao L, Zheng T, Yang G (2018) Experimental investigation on static/dynamic characteristics of a fast-response pressure sensitive paint. Chin J Aeronaut 31:1198–1205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2018.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Liu T, Sullivan JP (2005) Pressure and temperature sensitive paints. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  67. Liu T, Campbell BT, Burns SP, Sullivan JP (1997) Temperature- and pressure-sensitive luminescent paints in aerodynamics. Appl Mech Rev 50:227–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Liu T, Guille M, Sullivan JP (2001a) Accuracy of pressure-sensitive paint. AIAA J 39:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Liu T, Teduka N, Kameda M, Asai K (2001b) Diffusion timescale of porous pressure-sensitive paint. AIAA J 39:2400–2402.  https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lo KH, Kontis K (2016) Static and wind-on performance of polymer-based pressure-sensitive paints using platinum and ruthenium as the luminophore. Sensors 16(595):1–17.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mao Y, Gao Y, Wu S, Wu S, Shi J, Zhou B, Tian Y (2017) Highly enhanced sensitivity of optical oxygen sensors using microstructured PtTFPP/PDMS-pillar arrays sensing layer. Sens Actuators B-Chem 251:495–502.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.05.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Matsuda H, Fukuda K (1995) Ordered metal nanohole arrays made by a two-step replication of honeycomb structures of anodic alumina. Science 268:1466–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Matsuda Y, Uchida T, Suzuki S, Misaki R, Yamaguchi H, Niimi T (2011) Pressure-sensitive molecular film for investigation of micro gas flows. Micorfluid Nanofluid 10:165–171.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-010-0664-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Matsuda Y, Ueno K, Yamaguchi H, Egami Y, Niimi T (2012) Organic electroluminescent sensor for pressure measurement. Sensors 12:13899–13906.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s121013899 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Matsuda Y, Yorita D, Egami Y, Kameya T, Kakihara N, Yamaguchi H, Asai K, Niimi T (2013) Unsteady pressure-sensitive paint measurement based on the heterodyne method using low frame rate camera. Rev Sci Instr 84(105110):1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4826085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Matsuda Y, Uchida K, Egami Y, Yamaguchi H, Niimi T (2016) Polymer-particle pressure-sensitive paint with high photostability. Sensors 16(550):1–7.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s16040550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Matsuda Y, Kameya T, Suzuki Y, Yoshida Y, Egami Y, Yamaguchi H, Niimi T (2017) Fine printing of pressure- and temperature-sensitive paints using commercial inkjet printer. Sens Actuators BChem 250:563–568.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.04.188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. McGraw CM, Bell JH, Khalil G, Callis JB (2006) Dynamic surface pressure measurements on a square cylinder with pressure sensitive paint. Exp Fluids 40:203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. McMullen RM, Huynh DP, Gregory JW, Crafton J (2013) Dynamic calibrations for fast-response porous polymer/ceramic pressure-sensitive paint. In: AIAA ground testing conference, AIAA 2013-3123Google Scholar
  80. Mebarki Y (1998) Pressure sensitive paints: application in wind tunnels. ONERA NT 1998-6Google Scholar
  81. Merienne MC, Coponet D, Luyssen JM (2012) Transient pressure-sensitive-paint investigation in a nozzle. AIAA J 50:1453–1461.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Merienne MC, Le Sant Y, Lebrun F, Deleglise B, Sonnet D (2013) Transonic buffeting investigation using unsteady pressure-sensitive-paint in a large wind tunnel. In: 51st AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA-2013-1136Google Scholar
  83. Merienne MC, Molton P, Bur R, Le Sant Y (2015) Pressure-sensitive paint application to an oscillating shock wave in a transonic flow. AIAA J 53:3208–3220.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053744 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Michaux F, Mattern P, Kallweit S (2018) RoboPIV: how robotics enable PIV on a large industrial scale. Meas Sci Technol 29:074009.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aab5c1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Moon K, Mori H, Ambe Y, Kawabata H (2012) Development of dual-layer PSP/TSP system for pressure and temperature measurement in low-speed flow field. In: Proceedings of the ASME-JSME-KSME 2011 joint fluids engineering conference, AJK 2011-11020Google Scholar
  86. Moon K, Mori H, Furukawa M (2018) Simultaneous measurement method of pressure and temperature using dual-layer PSP/TSP with lifetime-based method. Meas Sci Technol 29:125301.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aae408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Morita K, Suzuki K, Imamura O, Sakaue H (2011) Temperature-cancelled anodized-aluminum pressure sensitive paint for hypersonic wind tunnel application. In: 41st AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, AIAA-2011-3724Google Scholar
  88. Nakakita K (2007) Unsteady pressure distribution measurement around 2D-cylinders using pressure-sensitive paint. In: 25th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, AIAA 2007-3819.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-3819
  89. Nakakita K (2011) Unsteady pressure measurement on NACA0012 model using global low-speed unsteady PSP technique. In: 41st AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, AIAA 2011-3901Google Scholar
  90. Nakakita K (2013) Detection of phase and coherence of unsteady pressure field using unsteady PSP measurement. In: AIAA ground testing conference, AIAA-2013-3124Google Scholar
  91. Nakakita K, Yamazaki T, Asai K, Teduka N, Fuji A, Kameda M (2000) Pressure sensitive paint measurement in a hypersonic shock tunnel. In: 21st AIAA aerodynamic measurement technology and ground testing conference, AIAA 2000-2523.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2000-2523
  92. Nakakita K, Takama Y, Imagawa K, Kato H (2012) Unsteady PSP measurement of transonic unsteady flow field around a rocket fairing model. In: 28th aerodynamic measurement technology, ground testing, and flight testing conference, AIAA-2012-2758Google Scholar
  93. Noda T, Nakakita K, Wakahara M, Kameda M (2018) Detection of small-amplitude periodic surface pressure fluctuation by pressure-sensitive paint measurements using frequency-domain methods. Exp Fluids.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-018-2550-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Ogg DR, Rice BE, Peltier SJ, Staines JT, Claucherty SL, Combs CS (2018) Simultaneous stereo digital image correlation and pressure-sensitive paint measurements of a compliant panel in a Mach 2 wind tunnel. In: 2018 fluid dynamics conference, AIAA-2018-3869Google Scholar
  95. Panda J (2017) Experimental verification of buffet calculation procedure using unsteady pressure-sensitive paint. J Aircraft 54:1791–1801.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C033917 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Pandey A, Gregory JW (2015) Step response characteristics of polymer/ceramic pressure-sensitive paint. Sensors 15:22304–22324.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s150922304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Pandey A, Gregory JW (2016) Frequency-response characteristics of polymer/ceramic pressure-sensitive paint. AIAA J 54:174–185.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J054166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Pandey A, Gregory JW (2018) Iterative blind deconvolution algorithm for deblurring a single PSP/TSP image of rotating surfaces. Sensors 18:3075.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s18093075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Pandey A, Gregory JW, Stansfield S, Crafton J (2016) Comparison of blur elimination techniques for PSP images of rotating surfaces. In: 54th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA-2016-2019Google Scholar
  100. Pastuhoff M, Yorita D, Asai K, Alfredsson PH (2013) Enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio of pressure sensitive paint data by singular value decomposition. Meas Sci Technol 24:075301.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/24/7/075301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Pastuhoff M, Tillmark N, Alfredsson PH (2016) Measuring surface pressure on rotating compressor blades using pressure sensitive paint. Sensors 16:344.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s16030344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Peng D, Liu Y (2016) A grid-pattern PSP/TSP system for simultaneous pressure and temperature measurements. Sens Actuators B Chem 222:141–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.08.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Peng D, Jensen CD, Juliano TJ, Gregory JW, Crafton J, Palluconi S, Liu T (2013) Temperature-compensated fast pressure-sensitive paint. AIAA J 51:2420–2431.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Peng D, Jiao L, Liu Y (2016a) Development of a grid PSP/TSP system for unsteady measurements on rotating surfaces. In: 32nd AIAA aerodynamic measurement technology and ground testing conference, AIAA 2016-3405Google Scholar
  105. Peng D, Jiao L, Sun Z, Gu Y, Liu Y (2016b) Simultaneous PSP and TSP measurements of transient flow in a long-duration hypersonic tunnel. Exp Fluids 57(188):1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-016-2280-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Peng D, Wang S, Liu Y (2016c) Fast PSP measurements of wall-pressure fluctuation in low speed flows: improvements using proper orthogonal decompostion. Exp Fluids.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-016-2130-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Peng D, Jiao L, Yu Y, Liu Y, Oshio T, Kawakubo T, Yakushiji A (2017) Single-shot lifetime-based PSP and TSP measurements on turbocharger compressor blades. Exp Fluids 58(127):1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2416-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Peng D, Chen J, Jiao L, Liu Y (2018a) A fast-responding semi-transparent pressure-sensitive paint based on through-hole anodized aluminum oxide membrane. Sens Actuators A-Phys 274:10–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.02.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Peng D, Chen J, Yu Y, Jiao L, Liu Y (2018b) A novel laminated OLED-PSP system for measurement on moving surfaces. J Vis Jpn 21:215–223.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-017-0458-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Peng D, Gu F, Li Y, Liu Y (2018c) A novel sprayable fast-responding pressure-sensitive paint based on mesoporous silicone dioxide particles. Sens Actuators A Phys 279:390–398.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.06.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Peng D, Zhong Z, Cai T, Guo S, Zhao X, Liu Y (2018d) Integration of pressure-sensitive paint with persistent phosphor: a light-charged pressure-sensing system. Rev Sci Instr 89:085003.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5041359 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Peng D, Li Y, Jiao L, Liu Y (2019a) Challenges and countermeasures of fast psp applications for measurements on rotating blades. J Eng Thermophys. Accepted and under productionGoogle Scholar
  113. Peng D, Zhong Z, Gu F, Zhou W, Qi F, Liu Y (2019b) Pressure-sensitive paint with imprinted pattern for full-field endoscopic measurement using a color camera. Sens Actuators A Phys 290:28–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Raffel M, Heineck JT (2014) Mirror-based image derotation for aerodynamic rotor measurements. AIAA J 52:1337–1341.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052836 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Running CL, Sakaue H, Juliano TJ (2019) Hypersonic boundary-layer separation detection with pressure-sensitive paint for a cone at high angle of attack. Exp Fluids.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-018-2665-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Ruyten W, Sellers M, Baker W (2009) Spatially nonuniform self-quenching of the pressure-sensitive paint PtTFPP/FIB. In: 47th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA-2009-1660Google Scholar
  117. Sakamura Y, Matsumoto M, Suzuki T (2005) High frame-rate imaging of surface pressure distribution using a porous pressure-sensitive paint. Meas Sci Technol 16:759–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Sakamura Y, Suzuki T, Kawabata S (2015) Development and characterization of a pressuresensitive luminescent coating based on Pt(II)-porphyrin self-assembled monolayers. Meas Sci Technol 26(064002):1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/26/6/064002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Sakaue H (1999) Porous pressure sensitive paints for aerodynamic applications. Purdue University, West LafayetteGoogle Scholar
  120. Sakaue H, Ishii K (2010a) A dipping duration study for optimization of anodized-aluminum pressure-sensitive paint. Sensors 10:9799–9807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Sakaue H, Ishii K (2010b) Optimization of anodized-aluminum pressure-sensitive paint by controlling luminophore concentration. Sensors 10:6836–6847.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s100706836 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Sakaue H, Gregory JW, Sullivan JP (2002a) Porous pressure-sensitive paint for characterizing unsteady flowfields. AIAA J 40:1094–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Sakaue H, Matsumura S, Schneider SP, Sullivan JP (2002b) Anodized aluminum pressure sensitive paint for short duration testing. In: 22nd AIAA aerodynamic measurement technology and ground testing conference, AIAA-2002-2908Google Scholar
  124. Sakaue H, Tabei T, Kameda M (2006) Hydrophobic monolayer coating on anodized aluminum pressure-sensitive paint. Sens Actuators B Chem 119:504–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Sakaue H, Kakisako T, Ishikawa H (2011) Characterization and optimization of polymer-ceramic pressure-sensitive paint by controlling polymer content. Sensors 11:6967–6977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Sakaue H, Miyamoto K, Miyazaki T (2013a) A motion-capturing pressure-sensitive paint method. J Appl Phys 113:084901.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4792761 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Sakaue H, Morita K, Iijima Y, Sakamura Y (2013b) Response time scales of anodized-aluminum pressure-sensitive paints. Sens Actuators A Phys 199:74–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2013.04.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Sano S, Yuuki T, Hyakutake T, Morita K, Sakaue H, Arai S, Matsumoto H, Michinobu T (2018) Temperature compensation of pressure-sensitive luminescent polymer sensors. Sens Actuators B Chem 255:1960–1966.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.08.221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Schairer ET (2002) Optimum thickness of pressure-sensitive paint for unsteady measurements. AIAA J 40:2312–2318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Schneider JJ, Engstler J, Budna KP, Teichert C, Franska S (2005) Freestanding, highly flexible, large area, nanoporous alumina membranes with complete through-hole pore morphology. Eur J Inorg Chem 2005:2352–2359.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.200401046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Schreivogel P, Paniagua G, Bottini H (2012) Pressure sensitive paint techniques for surface pressure measurements in supersonic flows. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 39:189–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.01.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Schulz B, Klein C (2005) Light emitting surfaces of wind tunnel models for excitation of pressure sensitive paint. In: 21st international congress on instrumentation in aerospace simulation facilities.  https://doi.org/10.1109/iciasf.2005.1569933
  133. Scroggin AM, Slamovich EB, Crafton JW, Lachendo N, Sullivan JP (1999) Porous polymer/ceramic composites for luminescent-based temperature and pressure measurement. Mater Res Soc Proc 560:347–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Shen Y, Clarke DR (2009) Effects of reducing atmosphere on the luminescence ofEu3+-doped yttria-stabilized zirconia sensor layers in thermal barriercoatings. J Am Ceram Soc 92:125–129.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.csz1551-2916.2008.02866.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Singh M, Naughton JW, Yamashita T, Nagai H, Asai K (2011) Surface pressure and flow field behind an oscillating fence submerged in turbulent boundary layer. Exp Fluids 50:701–714.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-0977-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Sugimoto T, Kitashima S, Numata D, Nagai H, Asai K (2012) Characterization of frequency response of pressure-sensitive paints. In: 50th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, AIAA-2012-1185Google Scholar
  137. Sugimoto T, Sugioka Y, Numata D, Nagai H, Asai K (2017) Characterization of frequency response of pressure-sensitive paints. AIAA J 55:1460–1464.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J054985 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Sugioka Y, Arakida K, Kasai M, Nonomura T, Asai K, Egami Y, Nakakita K (2018a) Evaluation of the characteristics and coating film structure of polymer/ceramic pressure-sensitive paint. Sensors 18:4041.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s18114041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Sugioka Y, Numata D, Asai K, Koike S, Nakakita K, Nakajima T (2018b) Polymer/ceramic pressure-sensitive paint with reduced roughness for unsteady measurement in transonic flow. AIAA J 56:2145–2156.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Watkins AN, Leighty BD, Lipford WE, Wong OD, Oglesby DM, Ingram JL (2007) Development of a pressure sensitive paint system for measuring global surface pressures on rotorcraft Blades. In: 22nd international congress on instrumentation in aerospace simulation facilities.  https://doi.org/10.1109/iciasf.2007.4380888
  141. Watkins AN, Buck GM, Leighty BD, Lipford WE, Oglesby DM (2009) Using pressure- and temperature-sensitive paint on the aftbody of a capsule vehicle. AIAA J 47:821–829.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.37258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Watkins AN, Leighty BD, Lipford WE, Goodman KZ, Crafton J, Gregory JW (2016) Measuring surface pressures on rotor blades using pressure-sensitive paint. AIAA J 54:206–215.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J054191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Weiss A, Geisler R, Schwermer T, Yorita D, Henne U, Klein C, Raffel M (2017) Single-shot pressure-sensitive paint lifetime measurements on fast rotating blades using an optimized double-shutter technique. Exp Fluids 58:120.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2400-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Wen X, Liu Y, Li Z, Chen Y, Peng D (2018) Data mining of a clean signal from highly noisy data based on compressed data fusion: a fast-responding pressure-sensitive paint application. Phys Fluids.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5046681 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Wong OD, Watkins AN, Ingram JL (2005) Pressure-sensitive paint measurements on 15% scale rotor blades in Hover. In: 35th AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, AIAA 2005-5008Google Scholar
  146. Wong OD, Noonan KW, Watkins AN, Jenkins LN, Yao C (2010) Non-intrusive measurements of a four-bladed rotor in hover—a first look. In: American Helicopter Society Aeromechanics Specialists’ ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  147. Wong OD, Watkins AN, Goodman KZ, Crafton JW, Forlines A, Goss L, Gregory JW, Juliano TJ (2012) Blade tip pressure measurements using pressure sensitive paint. In: AHS 68th Annual ForumGoogle Scholar
  148. Yang L, Zare-Behtash H, Erdem E, Kontis K (2012) Investigation of the double ramp in hypersonic flow using luminescent measurement systems. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 40:50–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.01.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Yang L, Peng D, Shan X, Guo F, Liu Y, Zhao X, Xiao P (2018) “Oxygen quenching” in Eu-based thermographic phosphors: mechanism and potential application in oxygen/pressure sensing. Sens Actuators B-Chem 254:578–587.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.07.092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Yorita D, Nagai H, Asai K, Narumi T (2010) Unsteady PSP Technique for Measuring Naturally-Disturbed Periodic Phenomena. In: 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA-2010-307.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-307
  151. Yorita D, Henne U, Klein C (2017) Improvement of lifetime-based PSP technique for industrial wind tunnel tests. In: 55th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, AIAA-2017-0703Google Scholar
  152. Yorita D, Henne U, Klein C, Munekata M, Holst G (2019) Investigation of image-based lifetime PSP measurements with sinusoidal excitation light. In: AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, AIAA-2019-0023Google Scholar
  153. Zare-Behtash H, Yang L, Gongora-Orozco N, Kontis K, Jones A (2012) Anodized aluminium pressure sensitive paint: effect of paint application technique. Measurement 45:1902–1905.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2012.03.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Gas Turbine Research Institute/School of Mechanical EngineeringShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations