Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 60:159 | Cite as

Suppressing tip vortex cavitation by winglets

  • Ali AminiEmail author
  • Martino Reclari
  • Takeshi Sano
  • Masamichi Iino
  • Mohamed Farhat
Research Article

Abstract

Despite the numerous remedies prescribed so far, tip vortex cavitation (TVC) remains a major issue in design and operation of diverse applications. In this paper, we experimentally investigate the effectiveness of winglets in suppressing TVC. An elliptical hydrofoil is selected as the baseline geometry and various winglets are realized by bending the last 5 or 10% of the span at ± 45° and ± 90° dihedral angles. To better focus on the physics of the problem, we have intentionally avoided any optimization on the geometries and our winglets are only smooth non-planar extensions of the original cross-section. Modifying no more than 3.7% of the lifting surface, lift-and-drag force measurements demonstrate that the hydrodynamic performances of the winglet-equipped hydrofoils are not substantially different from the baseline. Nevertheless, cavitation inception–desinence tests reveal that undeniable advantages are achieved by the winglets in TVC alleviation. It is found that the 10%-bent 90° winglets are more effective than the 45° cases, with − 90° (bent down toward the pressure side) performing superior to + 90°. For instance, the 90°-bent-downward winglet reduces the TVC inception index from 2.5 for the baseline down to 0.8 (a reduction of 68%) at 15 m/s freestream velocity and 14° incidence angle. In addition, the study on the bending length effect conducted for the 90° configurations shows that the 5%-bent winglets are not as striking as the 10% ones. Employing Stereo-PIV technique, the influence of winglets on non-cavitating flow structures is examined. For the most effective winglet (10%-bent 90°-downward), we observe that the maximum tangential velocity of the tip vortex falls to almost half of the baseline and the vortex core size increases significantly (by almost 70%). These effects are accompanied by a tangible reduction in the axial velocity at the vortex core leading to further mitigation of TVC.

Graphic abstract

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present research received funding from the MSCA-ITN-ETN of the European Union’s H2020 program under REA Grant agreement N° 642536, and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (Japan).

References

  1. Amini A, Reclari M, Sano T et al (2019) On the physical mechanism of tip vortex cavitation hysteresis. Exp Fluids 60:118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson EA, Lawton TA (2003) Correlation between vortex strength and axial velocity in a trailing vortex. J Aircr 40:699–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arndt REA (2002) Cavitation in vortical flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 34:143–175.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.34.082301.114957 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Arndt R, Arakeri V, Higuchi H (1991) Some observations of tip-vortex cavitation. J Fluid Mech 229:269–289.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112091003026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arndt R, Pennings P, Bosschers J, van Terwisga T (2015) The singing vortex. Interface Focus 5:20150025.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2015.0025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chahine G, Frederick G, Bateman R (1993) Propeller tip vortex cavitation suppression using selective polymer injection. J Fluids Eng 115:497–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang N, Ganesh H, Yakushiji R, Ceccio SL (2011) Tip vortex cavitation suppression by active mass injection. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 133:111301.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Devenport WJ, Vogel CM, Zsoldos JS (1999) Flow structure produced by the interaction and merger of a pair of co-rotating wing-tip vortices. J Fluid Mech 394:357–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dreyer M, Decaix J, Münch-Alligné C, Farhat M (2014) Mind the gap: a new insight into the tip leakage vortex using stereo-PIV. Exp Fluids 55:1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dupont P (1993) Etude de la dynamique d’une poche de cavitation partielle en vue de la prédiction de l’érosion dans les turbomachines hydrauliques. EPFL/LMHGoogle Scholar
  11. Escaler X, Egusquiza E, Farhat M et al (2006) Detection of cavitation in hydraulic turbines. Mech Syst Signal Process 20:983–1007.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Falcão L, Gomes AA, Suleman A (2011) Aero-structural design optimization of a morphing wingtip. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 22:1113–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fruman D, Aflalo S (1989) Tip vortex cavitation inhibition by drag-reducing polymer solutions. J Fluids Eng 111:211–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gao H, Zhu W, Liu Y, Yan Y (2019) Effect of various winglets on the performance of marine propeller. Appl Ocean Res 86:246–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gavrilović NN, Rašuo BP, Dulikravich GS, Parezanović VB (2015) Commercial aircraft performance improvement using winglets. FME Trans 43:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerontakos P, Lee T (2006) Effects of winglet dihedral on a tip vortex. J Aircr 43:117–124.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.14052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gim O-S, Lee G-W (2013) Flow characteristics and tip vortex formation around a NACA 0018 foil with anendplate. Ocean Eng 60:28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graftieaux L, Michard M, Grosjean N (2001) Combining PIV, POD and vortex identification algorithms for the study of unsteady turbulent swirling flows. Meas Sci Technol 12:1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heyes AL, Jones RF, Smith DAR (2004) Wandering of wing-tip vortices. In: Proceedings of the 12th international symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  20. Kroo I (2005) Nonplanar wing concepts for increased aircraft efficiency. VKI lecture series on innovative configurations and advanced concepts for future civil aircraft, Stanford University, USA, pp 6–10Google Scholar
  21. Lacaze L, Ryan K, Le Dizes S (2007) Elliptic instability in a strained Batchelor vortex. J Fluid Mech 577:341–361MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee T, Pereira J (2010) Nature of wakelike and jetlike axial tip vortex flows. J Aircr 47:1946–1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee C-S, Ahn B-K, Han J-M, Kim J-H (2018a) Propeller tip vortex cavitation control and induced noise suppression by water injection. J Mar Sci Technol 23:453–463.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-017-0484-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee S-J, Shin J-W, Arndt REA, Suh J-C (2018b) Attenuation of the tip vortex flow using a flexible thread. Exp Fluids 59:23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2476-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leweke T, Le Dizes S, Williamson CH (2016) Dynamics and instabilities of vortex pairs. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 48:507–541MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luo X, Ji B, Tsujimoto Y (2016) A review of cavitation in hydraulic machinery. J Hydrodyn 28:335–358.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60638-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McAlister KW, Takahashi RK (1991) NACA 0015 wing pressure and trailing vortex measurements. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Moffett Field CA Ames Research, Mountain ViewGoogle Scholar
  28. McLean D (2005) Wingtip devices: what they do and how they do it. In: Boeing performance and flight operations engineering conference, USAGoogle Scholar
  29. Oda Y, Rinoie K, Yuhara T (2017) Studies on wingtip geometries by optimum spanwise lift distribution design method, In: 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Texas, USA, p 1657Google Scholar
  30. Ommundsen A (2015) Unconventional propeller tip design. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  31. Park S-I, Lee S-J, You G-S, Suh J-C (2014) An experimental study on tip vortex cavitation suppression in a marine propeller. J Ship Res 58:157–167.  https://doi.org/10.5957/JOSR.58.3.130059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ren Y, Liu B, Zhang T, Fang Q (2017) Design and hydrodynamic analysis of horizontal axis tidal stream turbines with winglets. Ocean Eng 144:374–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roussopoulos K, Monkewitz PA (2000) Measurements of tip vortex characteristics and the effect of an anti-cavitation lip on a model Kaplan turbine blade. Flow Turbul Combust 64:119–144.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009976411156 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Roy C, Leweke T, Thompson MC, Hourigan K (2011) Experiments on the elliptic instability in vortex pairs with axial core flow. J Fluid Mech 677:383–416MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shen YT, Gowing S, Jessup S (2009) Tip vortex cavitation inception scaling for high reynolds number applications. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 131:071301.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3130245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Song M, Xu L, Peng X, Tang D (2017) An acoustic approach to determine tip vortex cavitation inception for an elliptical hydrofoil considering nuclei-seeding. Int J Multiph Flow 90:79–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Souders WG, Platzer GP (1981) Tip vortex cavitation characteristics and delay of inception on a three-dimensional hydrofoil. David W Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  38. Spalart PR (1998) Airplane trailing vortices. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 30:107–138.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.107 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. Takenaka K, Hatanaka K, Yamazaki W, Nakahashi K (2008) Multidisciplinary design exploration for a winglet. J Aircr 45:1601–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vatistas GH, Kozel V, Mih WC (1991) A simpler model for concentrated vortices. Exp Fluids 11:73–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whitcomb RT (1976) A design approach and selected wind tunnel results at high subsonic speeds for wing-tip mounted winglets. Langley research Center, Hampton, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)LausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Research and Innovation CenterMitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI)TakasagoJapan

Personalised recommendations