Experiments in Fluids

, 60:151 | Cite as

The effects of slide cohesion on impulse-wave formation

  • Zhenzhu MengEmail author
  • Christophe Ancey
Research Article


Experimental studies of impulse-wave formation have mostly used rigid blocks or granular materials to mimic landslides at the laboratory scale. These studies have deduced that material deformability plays a key part in wave formation: the more rigid the sliding mass, the higher the impulse wave. It is, however, still unclear whether higher wave amplitudes arise solely from lower deformability. Indeed, blocks are not only rigid, but they are also cohesive, whereas granular media are deformable and cohesionless. To shed light on this issue, we ran experiments using two deformable materials of equal density, one exhibiting no cohesion (soft 15-mm-diameter balls) and the other exhibiting cohesion (a viscoplastic polymeric gel called Carbopol Ultrez 10). A finite volume of material was released at the top of a chute, penetrated a body of water, and generated impulse waves. We monitored how the mass slid and interacted with the water volume. Using high-speed cameras, we measured maximum wave heights, amplitudes, and lengths of the leading wave. We used dimensionless groups to reduce the dimension of the parameter space, making it possible to carry out a regression analysis. Viscoplastic slides generated larger wave amplitudes but shorter wave lengths than granular materials. Surprisingly, the wave features did not depend on the polymer concentration. In other terms, impulse-wave features were not found to be dependent on the cohesion of the deformable material landslides causing them, within the range of concentrations tested.

Graphic abstract

Variations in the scaled maximum wave amplitude Am to dimensionless group Q a for carbopol (at concentrations of 3.0%, 2.5% and 2.0%), b for carbopol and water balls

Variation in the waves maximum potential energy Ep relative to the slides kinetic energy EI



The authors acknowledge the support of the EPFL’s Civil Engineering Department and the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant No. 200021_146271/1 for a project called “Physics of Basal Entrainment”). They also acknowledge the support of the China Scholarship Council (Grant No. 201506710074).


  1. Abadie S, Morichon D, Grilli S, Glockner S (2010) Numerical simulation of waves generated by landslides using a multiple-fluid Navier-Stokes model. Coast Eng 57(9):779–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ancey C (2007) Plasticity and geophysical flows: a review. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 142:4–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ataie-Ashtiani B, Nik-Khah A (2008) Impulsive waves caused by subaerial landslides. Environ Fluid Mech 2008:263–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balmforth NJ, Frigaard IA, Ovarlez G (2014) Yielding to stress: recent developments in viscoplastic fluid mechanics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 46:121–146MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonn D, Denn MM, Berthier L, Divoux T, Manneville S (2017) Yield stress materials in soft condensed matter. Rev Mod Phys 89:035005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ciabatti M (1964) La dinamica della frana del Vajont. Museo geologico Giovanni Capellini, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  7. Cochard S (2007) Measurements of time-dependent free-surface viscoplastic flows down steep slopes. Ph.D. thesis, EPFL LausanneGoogle Scholar
  8. Evers F, Hager W (2015) Impulse wave generation: comparison of free granular with mesh-packed slides. J Mar Sci Eng 3(1):100–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evers FM, Hager WH (2017) Generation and spatial propagation of landslide generated impulse waves. Coast Eng Proc 35(1)Google Scholar
  10. Fernández-Nieto E, Bouchut F, Bresch D, Castro Díaz M, Mangeney A (2008) A new Savage–Hutter type model for submarine avalanches and generated tsunami. J Comput Phys 227:7720–7754MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fritz HM (2002) Initial phase of landslide generated impulse waves. Ph.D. thesis, ETH ZurichGoogle Scholar
  12. Fritz HM, Hager WH, Minor HE (2003a) Landslide generated impulse waves. 1. Instantaneous flow fields. Exp Fluids 35(6):505–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fritz H, Hager W, Minor H-E (2003b) Landslide generated impulse waves. 2. Hydrodynamic impact craters. Exp Fluids 35(6):520–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fritz H, Hager W, Minor H-E (2004) Near field characteristics of landslide generated impulse waves. J Waterw Port C-ASCE 130(6):287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fritz HM, Mohammed F, Yoo J (2009) Lituya bay landslide impact generated mega-tsunami 50 th anniversary. In: Tsunami Science Four Years after the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. Springer, pp 153–175Google Scholar
  16. Heller V (2007) Landslide generated impulse waves: prediction of near field characteristics. Ph.D. thesis, ETH ZurichGoogle Scholar
  17. Heller V, Bruggemann M, Spinneken J, Rogers BD (2016) Composite modelling of subaerial landslide-tsunamis in different water body geometries and novel insight into slide and wave kinematics. Coast Eng 109:20–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heller V, Hager WH (2011) Wave types of landslide generated impulse waves. Ocean Eng 38:630–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heller V, Hager WH (2014) A universal parameter to predict subaerial landslide tsunamis? J Mar Sci Eng 2:400–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heller V, Hager WH, Minor H-E (2008a) Rutscherzeugte Impulswellen in Stauseen–Grundlagen und Berechnung. Tech. Rep. VAW 4257, Versuchsanstalt für Wasserbau, Hydrologie und Glaziologie VAW, ETH Zürich, und Bundesamt für Energie, BernGoogle Scholar
  21. Heller V, Hager WH, Minor H-E (2008b) Scale effects in subaerial landslide generated impulse waves. Exper Fluids 44:691–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heller V, Hager WH (2010) Impulse product parameter in landslide generated impulse waves. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 136(3):145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heller V, Spinneken J (2013) Improved landslide-tsunami prediction: effects of block model parameters and slide model. J Geophys Res 118:1489–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heller V, Spinneken J (2015) On the effect of the water body geometry on landslide-tsunamis: physical insight from laboratory tests and 2d to 3d wave parameter transformation. Coast Eng 104:113–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huber A (1980) Schwallwellen in Seen als Folge von Felsstürzen. Ph.D. thesis, ETH ZurichGoogle Scholar
  26. Huber A, Hager WH (1997) Forecasting impulse waves in reservoirs. In: 19ème Congrès des Grands Barrages. ICOLD, Paris, Florence, pp C.31 : 993–1005Google Scholar
  27. Iverson R (1997) The physics of debris flows. Rev Geophys 35:245–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Iverson R, Vallance J (2001) New views of granular mass flows. Geology 29:115–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kamphuis J, Bowering R (1970) Impulse waves generated by landslides. In: Johnson JW (ed) 12th Conference on Coastal Engineering, vol 1. ASCE. New York, Washington, pp 575–586Google Scholar
  30. Kranzer HC, Keller JB (1959) Water waves produced by explosions. J Appl Phys 30(3):398–407MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Le Méhauté B, Wang S (1996) Water waves generated by underwater explosion. World Scientific Publishing, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindstrøm EK (2016) Waves generated by subaerial slides with various porosities. Coast Eng 116:170–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McFall BC, Fritz HM (2017) Runup of granular landslide generated tsunamis on planar coasts and conical islands. J Geophys Res: Oceans 122:6901–6922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McFall BC, Mohammed F, Fritz HM, Liu Y (2018) Laboratory experiments on three-dimensional deformable granular landslides on planar and conical slopes. Landslides 15(9):1713–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meng Z (2018) Experimental study on impulse waves generated by a viscoplastic material at laboratory scale. Landslides 15(6):1173–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mohammed F, Fritz HM (2012) Physical modeling of tsunamis generated by three-dimensional deformable granular landslides. J Geophys Res Oceans 117:C11015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mulligan RP, Take WA (2017) On the transfer of momentum from a granular landslide to a water wave. Coast Eng 125:16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Noda E (1970) Water waves generated by landslides. J Waterw Harb Coast Eng Div ASCE 96:835–855Google Scholar
  39. Tang G, Lu L, Teng Y, Zhang Z, Xie Z (2018) Impulse waves generated by subaerial landslides of combined block mass and granular material. Coast Eng 141:68–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walder J, Watts P, Sorensen O, Jansse K (2003) Tsunamis generated by subaerial mass flows. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 108:B2563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Watts P (1997) Water waves generated by underwater landslides. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  42. Yavari-Ramshe S, Ataie-Ashtiani B (2016) Numerical modeling of subaerial and submarine landslide-generated tsunami-waves recent advances and future challenges. Landslides 13(6):1325–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yavari-Ramshe S, Ataie-Ashtiani B (2018) On the effects of landslide deformability and initial submergence on landslide-generated waves. Landslides 1–17Google Scholar
  44. Zitti G, Ancey C, Postacchini M, Brocchini M (2016) Impulse waves generated by snow avalanches: momentum and energy transfer to the water body. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 121 2399–2423Google Scholar
  45. Zitti G, Ancey C, Postacchini M, Brocchini M (2017) Snow avalanches striking water basins: behaviour of the avalanche’s centre of mass and front. Nat Hazards 88:1297–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zweifel A (2004) Impulswellen: Effekte der Rutschdichte und der Wassertiefe. Ph.D. thesis, ETH ZurichGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ENAC/IIC/LHEÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations