Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 60:149 | Cite as

Particle image velocimetry in refractive index fields of combustion flows

  • Christoph VanselowEmail author
  • Dirk Stöbener
  • Johannes Kiefer
  • Andreas Fischer
Research Article

Abstract

Optical measurements inside reacting flows are often disturbed by refractive index fields, e.g., due to the strong density gradients in flames. Although occurring measurement errors due to light refraction are a known problem for certain particle image velocimetry (PIV) applications, only a qualitative analysis of the resulting measurement uncertainty inside flame flows has been carried out to date. As an important step forward, a measurement approach is proposed, which enables a quantification of the resulting measurement uncertainties due to light refraction. As an example, the measurement approach is applied to a premixed propane flame. The uncertainty analysis is based on the determination of occurring particle position errors due to light refraction inside the flame. For three different measurement planes, the velocity field is measured with PIV and the particle position errors are experimentally measured and verified by ray-tracing simulation based on the measured refractive index field, which is determined by the background-oriented Schlieren method. In the examined flow, maximal position errors amount up to 14 μm and yield significant systematic velocity errors of up to 4% and random velocity errors of up to 6%. In contrast to the systematic velocity error, the random velocity error varies significantly for the analyzed measurement planes inside the flame flow.

Graphic abstract

Notes

References

  1. Barlow RS (2007) Laser diagnostics and their interplay with computations to understand turbulent combustion. Proc Combust Inst 31(1):49–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Elsinga GE, van Oudheusden BW, Scarano F (2005) Evaluation of aero-optical distortion effects in PIV. Exp Fluids 39(2):246–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fischer A (2016) Fundamental uncertainty limit of optical flow velocimetry according to Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. Appl Opt 55(31):8787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fischer A (2017) Imaging flow velocimetry with laser mie scattering. Appl Sci 7(12):1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fischer A, König J, Czarske J, Peterleithner J, Woisetschläger J, Leitgeb T (2013) Analysis of flow and density oscillations in a swirl-stabilized flame employing highly resolving optical measurement techniques. Exp Fluids 54(12):1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kiefer J, Li ZS, Zetterberg J, Bai XS, Aldén M (2008) Investigation of local flame structures and statistics in partially premixed turbulent jet flames using simultaneous single-shot CH and OH planar laser-induced fluorescence imaging. Combust Flame 154(4):802–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Merzkirch W (2012) Flow visualization. Academic Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Nobach H, Bodenschatz E (2009) Limitations of accuracy in PIV due to individual variations of particle image intensities. Exp Fluids 47(1):27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nogenmyr KJ, Kiefer J, Li ZS, Bai XS, Aldén M (2010) Numerical computations and optical diagnostics of unsteady partially premixed methane/air flames. Combust Flame 157(5):915–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Raffel M (2015) Background-oriented schlieren (BOS) techniques. Exp Fluids 56(3):60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Raffel M, Willert C, Kompenhans J (2002) Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide (experimental fluid mechanics). Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. Schlüßler R, Czarske J, Fischer A (2014) Uncertainty of flow velocity measurements due to refractive index fluctuations. Opt Lasers Eng 54:93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schlüßler R, Bermuske M, Czarske J, Fischer A (2015) Simultaneous three-component velocity measurements in a swirl-stabilized flame. Exp Fluids 56(10):183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sharma A, Kumar DV, Ghatak AK (1982) Tracing rays through graded-index media: a new method. Appl Opt 21(6):984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Steinberg AM, Boxx I, Stöhr M, Carter CD, Meier W (2010) Flow flame interactions causing acoustically coupled heat release fluctuations in a thermo-acoustically unstable gas turbine model combustor. Combust Flame 157(12):2250–2266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stella A, Guj G, Giammartini S (2000) Measurement of axisymmetric temperature fields using reference beam and shearing interferometry for application to flames. Exp Fluids 29(1):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480050420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stella A, Guj G, Kompenhans J, Raffel M, Richard H (2001) Application of particle image velocimetry to combusting flows: design considerations and uncertainty assessment. Exp Fluids 30(2):167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tan DJ, Edgington-Mitchell D, Honnery D (2015) Measurement of density in axisymmetric jets using a novel background-oriented schlieren (BOS) technique. Exp Fluids 56(11):204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vanselow C, Fischer A (2018) Influence of inhomogeneous refractive index fields on particle image velocimetry. Opt Lasers Eng 107:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Voges M, Beversdorff M, Willert C, Krain H (2007) Application of particle image velocimetry to a transonic centrifugal compressor. Exp Fluids 43(2):371–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Westerweel J (1997) Fundamentals of digital particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 8(12):1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bremen Institute for Metrology, Automation and Quality Science (BIMAQ)University of BremenBremenGermany
  2. 2.Technische ThermodynamikUniversity of BremenBremenGermany
  3. 3.MAPEX Center for Materials and Processes University of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations