Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 60:146 | Cite as

High-speed tomographic PIV measurements in a DISI engine

  • Marco BraunEmail author
  • Wolfgang Schröder
  • Michael Klaas
Research Article
  • 150 Downloads

Abstract

Engine processes require fundamental knowledge on specific fuel–air mixtures to reduce pollutant emissions, i.e., soot formation, \(\hbox {CO}_2\), and \(\hbox {NO}_{x}\) generation, and to improve engine efficiency. However, the in-cylinder flow field of combustion engines is characterized by time-dependent and highly three-dimensional large-scale flow structures and cycle-to-cycle variations (CCV). This means that high-speed volumetric velocity measurements are required to investigate three-dimensional large-scale flow structures and CCV inside the combustion chamber at high temporal resolution. Since such data are hardly available in the literature, a high-speed tomographic particle image velocimetry (HS-TPIV) setup is used to measure the velocity field in an internal combustion engine at an engine speed of 1500 rpm and at a temporal resolution of \(10\,^\circ\) crank angle in a maximum measurement volume of \(50\times 8\times 83\,\hbox {mm}^3\). To assess the quality and the validity of the high-speed volumetric measurements, the HS-TPIV results are validated using high-speed stereoscopic particle image velocimetry measurements in the engines tumble plane. To further verify the measurement quality, an extensive error estimate is conducted. Finally, the instantaneous, three-dimensional measurement results are used to analyze the impact of fluctuations due to turbulence and CCV on the flow field in several instantaneous engine cycles at several predefined crank angles. The investigation shows the three-dimensional extent of flow fluctuations inside combustion engines and qualitatively quantifies the effect of CCV in in-cylinder flow.

Graphic abstract

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was performed as part of the Cluster of Excellence “Tailor-Made Fuels from Biomass”, which is funded by the Excellence Initiative of the German federal and state governments to promote science and research at German universities. Additional funding was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy Cluster of Excellence 2186 “The Fuel Science Center”—ID: 390919832. Furthermore, this research is part of the project “Analysis of cycle-to-cycle variations in IC engines using high-speed Tomographic Particle-Image Velocimetry” funded by the German Research Association (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG).

References

  1. Aleiferis PG, Behringer MK, Malcolm JS (2017) Integral length scales and time scales of turbulence in an optical spark-ignition engine. Flow Turbul Combust 98(2):523–577.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-016-9775-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arcoumanis C, Hu Z, Vafidis C, Whitelaw JH (1990) Tumbling motion: a mechanism for turbulence enhancement in spark-ignition engines. SAE Trans 99(3):375–391Google Scholar
  3. Baum E, Peterson B, Surmann C, Michaelis D, Böhm B, Dreizler A (2012) Tomographic PIV measurements in an IC engine. In: 16th international symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  4. Baum E, Peterson B, Bhm B, Dreizler A (2013a) On the validation of LES applied to internal combustion engine flows: part 1: comprehensive experimental database. Flow Turbul Combust 92(1–2):269–297.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-013-9468-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baum E, Peterson B, Surmann C, Michaelis D, Bhm B, Dreizler A (2013b) Investigation of the 3D flow field in an IC engine using tomographic PIV. Proc Combust Inst 34(2):2903–2910.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2012.06.123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benedict LH, Gould RD (1996) Towards better uncertainty estimates for turbulence statistics. Exp Fluids 22(2):129–136.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480050030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borée J, Miles PC (2014) In-cylinder flow. Encycl Automot Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118354179.auto119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brassat A, Thewes M, Müther M, Pischinger S (2011) Massgeschneiderte kraftstoffe aus biomasse für ottomotoren. MTZ Motortechnische Zeitschrift 72(12):988–995.  https://doi.org/10.1365/s35146-011-0212-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braun M, Palmer J, van Overbrggen T, Klaas M, Kneer R, Schrder W (2017) Influence of in-cylinder air flow on spray propagation. SAE Int J Engines 10(4):1398–1410.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-9280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braun M, Klaas M, Schrder W (2018) Influence of miller cycles on engine air flow. SAE Int J Engines.  https://doi.org/10.4271/03-11-02-0011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bücker I, Karhoff DC, Klaas M, Schröder W (2012) Stereoscopic multi-planar PIV measurements of in-cylinder tumbling flow. Exp Fluids 53(6):1993–2009.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-012-1402-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bücker I, Karhoff D, Dannemann J, Pielhop K, Klaas M, Schröder W (2013) Comparison of PIV measured flow structures in two four-valve piston engines. New Res Numer Exp Fluid Mech VIII 121:633–640.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35680-3_75 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen H, Xu M, Hung DL, Zhuang H (2014) Cycle-to-cycle variation analysis of early flame propagation in engine cylinder using proper orthogonal decomposition. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 58:48–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2014.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daniel R, Tian G, Xu H, Wyszynski ML, Wu X, Huang Z (2011) Effect of spark timing and load on a DISI engine fuelled with 2,5-dimethylfuran. Fuel 90(2):449–458.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Druault P, Guibert P, Alizon F (2005) Use of proper orthogonal decomposition for time interpolation from PIV data. Exp Fluids 39(6):1009–1023.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-005-0035-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elsinga GE, Scarano F, Wieneke B, van Oudheusden BW (2006) Tomographic particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 41(6):933–947.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-006-0212-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Esfandiari RS (2017) Numerical methods for engineers and scientists using MATLAB®, 2nd edn. CRC, Boca RatonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Gadekar S, Singh AP, Agarwal AK (2016) Tomographic PIV evaluation of in-cylinder flow evolution and effect of engine speed. SAE Int 2016-01-0638.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0638
  19. Gosman AD, Tsui YY, Vafidis C (1985) Flow in a model engine with a shrouded valve-a combined experimental and computational study. In: SAE technical paper series, SAE International, 10.4271/850498Google Scholar
  20. Graftieaux L, Michard M, Grosjean N (2001) Combining PIV, POD and vortex identification algorithms for the study of unsteady turbulent swirling flows. Meas Sci Technol 12(9):1422.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/12/9/307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heywood JB (1988) Internal combustion engine fundamentals. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoppe F, Burke U, Thewes M, Heufer A, Kremer F, Pischinger S (2016) Tailor-Made Fuels from Biomass: Potentials of 2-butanone and 2-methylfuran in direct injection spark ignition engines. Fuel 167:106–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.11.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Janssen A, Mther M, Pischinger S, Kolbeck A, Lamping M (2009) Tailor-Made Fuels: The potential of oxygen content in fuels for advanced diesel combustion systems. SAE Technical paper 2009-01-2765.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-2765
  24. Jarvis S, Justham T, Clarke A, Garner CP, Hargrave GK, Halliwell NA (2006) Time resolved digital PIV measurements of flow field cyclic variation in an optical IC engine. J Phys Confer Ser 45:38–45.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/45/1/007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kang KY, Oh SM, Lee JW, Lee KH, Bae CS (1997) The effects of tumble flow on lean burn characteristics in a four-valve SI engine. SAE Trans 106(3):981–989Google Scholar
  26. Lumley JL (1999) Engines: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175135. ISBN:9780521644891
  27. Mahmood Z, Chen A, Yianneskis M, Ganti G (1996) On the structure of steady flow through dual-intake engine ports. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 23(10):1085–1109.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19961130)23:10%3C1085::AID-FLD468%3E3.0.CO;2-X CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Michaelis D, Novara M, Scarano F, Wieneke B (2010) Comparison of volume reconstruction techniques at different particle densities. In: 15th international symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  29. Novara M, Batenburg KJ, Scarano F (2010) Motion tracking-enhanced MART for tomographic PIV. Meas Sci Technol 21(3):035401.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/21/3/035401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peterson B, Baum E, Ding CP, Michaelis D, Dreizler A, Bhm B (2017) Assessment and application of tomographic PIV for the spray-induced flow in an IC engine. Proc Combust Inst 36(3):3467–3475.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scarano F (2012) Tomographic PIV: principles and practice. Meas Sci Technol 24(1):012001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/24/1/012001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shafiee S, Topal E (2009) When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished? Energy Policy 37(1):181–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Singh AP, Gupta A, Agarwal AK (2015) Tomographic particle image velocimetry for flow analysis in a single cylinder optical engine. SAE Int J Mater Manuf.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-0599 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Singh BR, Singh O (2012) Global trends of fossil fuel reserves and climate change in the 21st century. InTechGoogle Scholar
  36. Thewes M, Mther M, Pischinger S, Budde M, Brunn A, Sehr A, Adomeit P, Kankermayer J et al (2011) Analysis of the impact of 2-methylfuran on mixture formation and combustion in a direct-injection spark-ignition engine. Energy Fuels 25(12):5549–5561.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef201021a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Towers DP, Towers CE (2004) Cyclic variability measurements of in-cylinder engine flows using high-speed particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 15(9):1917–1925.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/15/9/032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van Overbrüggen T, Klaas M, Bahl B, Schröder W (2015) Tomographic particle-image velocimetry analysis of in-cylinder flows. SAE Int J Engines.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-9042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Voisine M, Thomas L, Borée J, Rey P (2010) Spatio-temporal structure and cycle to cycle variations of an in-cylinder tumbling flow. Exp Fluids 50(5):1393–1407.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-0997-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang J, Tao B, Katz J (1997) Turbulent flow measurement in a square duct with hybrid holographic PIV. Exp Fluids 23(5):373–381.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480050124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of AerodynamicsRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations