Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 60:21 | Cite as

Volumetric calibration enhancements for single-camera light-field PIV

  • Shengxian Shi
  • Junfei Ding
  • T. H. New
  • You Liu
  • Hanmo Zhang
Research Article
  • 112 Downloads

Abstract

This work presents a volumetric calibration method for single-camera light-field particle image velocimetry (light-field PIV or LF-PIV). The proposed technique makes use of the unique point-like feature of particle light-field images to accurately determine affected pixels for a spatial voxel over a relative large measurement volume. A calibration model is derived based on Gaussian optics, which relates a spatial point light source with its confusion circle produced on microlens array (MLA), and optical distortions are accounted for by introducing five calibration parameters. By taking lens defects and misalignment between MLA and image sensor into account, the calibration method can calculate weighting coefficient for particle image reconstruction more accurately than the theoretical ray-tracing method, especially for regions further away from focal plane where light ray deflections are significant due to optical distortions. The volumetric calibration method was validated by simulation tests using synthetic light-field images, and has been successfully applied to a classic vortex-ring LF-PIV measurement, where the measurable range in depth direction was successfully extended and the quality of reconstructed volumetric velocity field was greatly improved.

Graphical abstract

List of symbols

\({S_{\text{o}}}\)

Object distance

\({S_{\text{i}}}\)

Image distance

\({f_{\text{m}}}\)

Focal length of the main lens

\({f_\# }\)

F-number of the main lens

\({p_{\text{m}}}\)

Effective aperture of the main lens

\(M\)

Magnification of the plenoptic camera, \(M= - \frac{{{S_{\text{i}}}}}{{{S_{\text{o}}}}}\)

\({f_{\text{l}}}\)

Focal length of lenslet

\({p_{\text{l}}}\)

Lenslet pitch

\({S_{\text{y}}}\)

Lenslet centre (relative to optical axis)

\({y_{\text{l}}}\)

Offset of a light ray from the lenslet centre

\({y_{\text{p}}}\)

Intersection of a light ray made with the pixel plane

\({y_{\text{c}}}\)

Intersection of a light ray made with the main lens, light ray passes lenslet centre

\({y_{\text{m}}}\)

Intersection of a light ray made with the main lens

\({C_{{\text{l}}(i)}}\)

Coordinate of the ith lenslet centre in pixel plane

\({d_{\text{l}}}\)

Lenslet pitch (in pixel plane), \({d_{\text{l}}}={p_{\text{l}}}\frac{{{S_{\text{i}}}+{f_{\text{l}}}}}{{{S_{\text{i}}}}}=\left| {{C_{{\text{l}}(i)}} - {C_{{\text{l}}(i - 1)}}} \right|\)

\(O\left( {X,Y,Z} \right)\)

3D coordinate of a point light source

\(E\left( {X,Y,Z} \right)\)

Intensity of a voxel at \(\left( {X,Y,Z} \right)\)

\(I({x_i},{y_i})\)

Pixel intensity of a light-field image at image coordinate \(({x_i},{y_i})\)

\(w={w_1} \times {w_2}\)

Weighting coefficient for MART reconstruction

\({w_1}\)

Lenslet weighting coefficient

\({w_2}\)

Pixel weighting coefficient

\(C{'_{df}}\)

Coordinate of the confusion circle centre (in MLA plane)

\(D{'_{df}}\)

Diameter of the confusion circle (in MLA plane)

\({C_{df}}\)

Coordinate of the confusion circle centre (in pixel plane), \({C_{df}}=C{'_{df}}\frac{{{S_{\text{i}}}+{f_{\text{l}}}}}{{{S_{\text{i}}}}}\)

\({D_{df}}\)

Diameter of the confusion circle (in pixel plane), \({D_{df}}=D{'_{df}}\frac{{{S_{\text{i}}}+{f_{\text{l}}}}}{{{S_{\text{i}}}}}\)

\({\mathcal{M}}_{4\times 3}\)

Mapping matrix that relates a spatial point \(O\left( {X,Y,Z} \right)\) with its corresponding \({C_{df}}\)

\({p_{\text{c}}}\)

Centre of point-like feature beneath each lenslet

ppm

Particle per microlens

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 11472175, 11772197) and Singapore Ministry of Education AcRF Tier-2 grant (Grant no. MOE2014-T2-1-002) are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Belden J (2013) Calibration of multi-camera systems with refractive interfaces. Exp Fluids 54:1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belden J, Truscott TT, Axiak M, Techet AH (2010) Three-dimensional synthetic aperture particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 21:125403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bok Y, Jeon H, Kweon I (2017) Geometric calibration of micro-lens-based light field cameras using line features. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 39:287–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen H, Sick V (2017) Three-dimensional three-component air flow visualization in a steady-state engine flow bench using a plenoptic camera. SAE Int J Engines 10:625–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ding J, Wang J, Liu Y, Shi S (2015) Dense ray tracing based reconstruction algorithm for light-field volumetric particle image velocimetry. In: 7th Australian conference on laser diagnostics in fluid mechanics and combustion. Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  6. Fahringer T, Thurow B (2016) Filtered refocusing: a volumetric reconstruction algorithm for plenoptic-PIV. Meas Sci Technol 27:094005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fahringer T, Lynch K, Thurow B (2015) Volumetric particle image velocimetry with a single plenoptic camera. Meas Sci Technol 26:115201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Georgiev T, Intwala C (2006) Light field camera design for integral view photography. Adobe Technical ReportGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall E, Fahringer T, Guildenbecher D, Thurow B (2018) Volumetric calibration of a plenoptic camera. Appl Opt 57:914–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heinze C, Spyropoulos S, Hussmann S, Perwass C (2016) Automated robust metric calibration algorithm for multifocus plenoptic cameras. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 65:1197–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maas HG (1995) New developments in multimedia photogrammetry. In: Grún A, Kahmen H (eds) Optical 3D measurement techniques III. Wichmann Verlag, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  12. New TH, Shi S, Zang B (2016) Some observations on vortex-ring collisions upon inclined surfaces. Exp Fluids 57:109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ng R (2006) Digital light-field photography. PhD thesis, Stanford, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Shi S, Wang J, Ding J, Zhao Z, New TH (2016) Parametric study on light-field volumetric particle image velocimetry. Flow Meas Instrum 49:70–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shi S, Ding J, New TH, Soria J (2017) Light-field camera-based 3D volumetric particle image velocimetry with dense ray tracing reconstruction technique. Exp Fluids 58:78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shi S, Ding J, Atkinson C, Soria J, New TH (2018) A detailed comparison of single-camera light-field PIV and tomographic PIV. Exp Fluids 59:46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Soloff SM, Adrian RJ, Liu ZC (1997) Distortion compensation for generalized stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 8:1441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thomason CM, Thurow BS, Fahringer TW (2014) Calibration of a microlens array for a plenoptic camera. In: 52nd aerospace sciences meetingGoogle Scholar
  19. Wieneke B (2008) Volume self-calibration for 3D particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 45:549–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wieneke B (2018) Improvements for volume self-calibration. Meas Sci Technol 29:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.School of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.College of Power and Energy EngineeringHarbin Engineering UniversityHarbinChina
  4. 4.Shanghai Aerospace Control Technology InstituteShanghai Key Laboratory of Space Intelligent Control TechnologyShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations