Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 60:10 | Cite as

Flame–cooling air interaction in an effusion-cooled model gas turbine combustor at elevated pressure

  • M. GreifensteinEmail author
  • J. Hermann
  • B. Boehm
  • A. Dreizler
Research Article
  • 209 Downloads

Abstract

The focus of this work is the investigation of flame–cooling air interaction by means of wall temperature (2D themographic phosphor thermometry), gas phase temperature (coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy), flame structure (planar laser-induced fluorescence of OH) and flow field (particle image velocimetry) measurements in an effusion-cooled single sector model gas turbine combustor. The rig is operated under close-to-reality boundary conditions, i.e., elevated combustor inlet temperature and increased system pressure. Parametric variations of important parameters, namely swirl, staging and effusion cooling air mass flow are conducted to investigate their effect on total film cooling effectiveness. Furthermore, we derive a dimensionless flame–cooling air interaction intensity parameter on the basis of OH-PLIF data. The latter revealed a higher interaction intensity for fully premixed operation at a low swirl number—a trend that is reversed for higher swirl numbers, where a partially premixed combustion mode leads to increased intensities. This trend is reflected in wall temperature as well as resulting film cooling effectiveness. Peak wall temperature varies up to \(150\,{\text {K}}\) across all parametric variations and up to \(200\,{\text {K}}\) in axial direction on the effusion-cooled liner for a given condition. This corresponds to a variation of total film cooling effectiveness between 0.45–0.57 and 0.45–0.62, respectively.

Graphical abstract

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through Project DR374/12-1.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Behrendt T, Hassa C (2008) A test rig for investigations of gas turbine combustor cooling concepts under realistic operating conditions. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 222(2):169–177.  https://doi.org/10.1243/09544100JAERO288 (ISSN:0954-4100) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Behrendt T, Lengyel T, Hassa C, Gerendás M (2008) Characterization of advanced combustor cooling concepts under realistic operating conditions. In: ASME Turbo expo 2008: power for land, sea, and air, pp 1801–1814, June 9–13.  https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2008-51191
  3. Bradley D, Roth G (2007) Adaptive thresholding using the integral image. J Gr Tools 12(2):13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brübach J, Pflitsch C, Dreizler A, Atakan B (2013) On surface temperature measurements with thermographic phosphors: a review. Progress Energy Combust Sci 39(1):37–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2012.06.001 (ISSN:03601285) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christof S, Andreas D, Volker E, Jürgen W (2007) Combustion diagnostics. In: Tropea C, Yarin AL, Foss JF (eds) Springer handbook of experimental fluid mechanics. Springer, Berlin, pp 1241–1315.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30299-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eckbreth AC (1978) Boxcars: crossed-beam phase-matched cars generation in gases. Appl Phys Lett 32(7):421.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.90070 (ISSN:00036951) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ewart P (1985) A modeless, variable bandwidth, tunable laser. Opt Commun 55(2):124–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4018(85)90314-1 (ISSN:00304018) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feist JP, Heyes AL, Seefelt S (2003) Thermographic phosphor thermometry for film cooling studies in gas turbine combustors. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A J Power Energy 217(2):193–200.  https://doi.org/10.1243/09576500360611227 (ISSN:0957-6509) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fuhrmann N, Brübach J, Dreizler A (2013) Phosphor thermometry: a comparison of the luminescence lifetime and the intensity ratio approach. Proc Combust Inst 34(2):3611–3618.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2012.06.084 (ISSN:15407489) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ge B, Ji Y, Chi Z, Zang S (2017) Effusion cooling characteristics of a model combustor liner at non-reacting/reacting flow conditions. Appl Therm Eng 113:902–911.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.11.049 (ISSN:13594311) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodwin DG, Moffat HK, Speth RL (2015) Cantera: an object-oriented software toolkit for chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport processes. http://www.cantera.org. Version 2.1.0. Accessed 30 July 2018
  12. Heinze J, Meier U, Behrendt T, Willert C, Geigle K-P, Lammel O, Lückerath R (2011) Plif thermometry based on measurements of absolute concentrations of the oh radical. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 225(11–12):1315–1341.  https://doi.org/10.1524/zpch.2011.0168 (ISSN:0942-9352) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hermann J, Greifenstein M, Boehm B, Dreizler A (2018) Experimental investigation of global combustion characteristics in an effusion cooled single sector model gas turbine combustor. Flow Turbul Combust.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-018-9999-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lange L, Heinze J, Schroll M, Willert C, Behrendt T (2012) Combination of planar laser optical measurement techniques for the investigation of pre-mixed lean combustion. In: 16th int symp on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics. Lisbon, Portugal, pp 9–12Google Scholar
  15. Palmer RE (1989) The carsft computer code calculating coherent anti-stokes raman spectra: User and programmer information. Technical report, Sandia National Labs., Livermore, CA (USA)Google Scholar
  16. Perona P, Malik J (1990) Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12(7):629–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Scarano F (2002) Iterative image deformation methods in piv. Meas Sci Technol 13(1):R1–R19.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/13/1/201 (ISSN:0957-0233) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith GP, Golden DM, Frenklach M, Moriarty NW, Eiteneer B, Goldenberg M, Bowman CT, Hanson RK, Song S, Gardiner WC Jr et al (2011) Gri-mech 3.0. http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech. Accessed 30 July 2018
  19. Van Aert S, Van Dyck D, Arnold J (2006) Resolution of coherent and incoherent imaging systems reconsidered-classical criteria and a statistical alternative. Opt Express 14(9):3830–3839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Weber V, Brübach J, Gordon RL, Dreizler A (2011) Pixel-based characterisation of cmos high-speed camera systems. Appl Phys B 103(2):421–433.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-011-4443-1 (ISSN:0946-2171) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Westerweel J (1994) Efficient detection of spurious vectors in particle image velocimetry data. Exp Fluids 16–16:3–4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00206543 (ISSN:0723-4864) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Reactive Flows and DiagnosticsTechnical University DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany
  2. 2.Energy and Power Plant TechnologyTechnical University DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations