Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 59:166 | Cite as

Bubbly drag reduction accompanied by void wave generation inside turbulent boundary layers

  • Hyun Jin Park
  • Yuji Tasaka
  • Yuichi Murai
Research Article

Abstract

Frictional drag reduction, a technique by which bubbles are injected into the turbulent boundary layer surrounding the hull of a marine vessel, is now at the stage of practical applications. In achieving drag reduction, void waves often stand out naturally, the reason for which still remains unclear. The present study aims at an experimental characterization of void waves along a flat-bottom ship. A 100-m-long water reservoir is used in which a 4-m-long fully transparent experimental model ship, equipped with wall shear stress sensors and cameras, is towed by a train at speeds of up to 3 m/s. From measurements of the transition of the bubble distribution from random to wavy accumulated swarms downstream, the accompanying intrinsic passing frequency of void waves is examined. A 30% drag reduction rate was recorded with the appearance of void waves in the boundary layer at an average void fraction of 4%. This is much greater than the trivial inertia effect from drag reduction. To clarify the characteristics of the measured void waves, we compare the void wave frequency range to those of several flow instabilities that may occur in bubbly two-phase boundary layer flows.

Graphical abstract

List of symbols

a

Propagation speed of gravity wave, m/s

c

Averaged streamwise velocity in a bubbly flow, m/s

Cf

Friction coefficient, dimensionless

F

Dimensionless constant when instability comes up, dimensionless

f

Wave-standing frequency, Hz

fmax

Maximum wave-standing frequency, Hz

fmin

Minimum wave-standing frequency, Hz

fpeak

Peak frequency of void wave, Hz

Fr

Froude number, dimensionless

fref

Referential frequency for normalization, Hz

fvoid

Frequency of void wave, Hz

f0

Referential frequency, Hz

G

Gain factor of drag reduction to void fraction in the boundary layer, dimensionless

g

Acceleration of gravity, m/s2

h

Characteristic length in Richardson number, dimensionless

k

Wave number, m−1

Qg

Flow rate of gas injection, m3/s

Qg,min

Minimum flow rate of gas injection, m3/s

Ql

Liquid flow rate in the boundary layer, m3/s

\(R{e_x}\)

Reynolds number on a flat plate, dimensionless

Ri

Richardson number, dimensionless

T

Time elapse in the Lagrangian frame, s

t

Elapsed time, s

U

Free stream velocity, m/s

\({U_i}\)

Velocity in fluid with suffixes i, m/s

Umain

Main flow velocity (equivalent of towing speed), m/s

\({u_y}\)

Velocity distribution in the downward direction, m/s

W

Width of the model ship, m

X

Distance from the bubble injector, m

x, y, z

Cartesian coordinates of the model ship, m

α

Void fraction in a bubbly flow, dimensionless

\({\alpha _\delta }\)

Void fraction in a boundary layer, dimensionless

δ

99% thickness of a boundary layer, m

λ

Means streamwise renewal distance, m

ν

Kinematic viscosity of water, m2/s

ρ

Density of fluid, kg/m3

\({\rho _i}\)

Density of fluid with suffixes i, kg/m3

τw

Averaged wall shear stress, Pa

τw0

Averaged wall shear stress in single-phase flow, Pa

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Developing Association for Shipbuilding and Offshore (REDAS), JSPS KAKENHI Grant no. 17H01245 and Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) no. 17K14583. The authors express their appreciation for all the support. Also, the authors thank Dr. Yoshihiko Oishi at Muroran Institute of Technology and Prof. Hironori Yasukawa at Hiroshima University for their support during various parts of the towing experiments.

References

  1. Bagheri S, Schlatter P, Schmid P, Henningson DS (2009) Global stability of a jet in crossflow. J Fluid Mech 624:33–44MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Broadbent HA, Maksik YA (1992) Analysis of periodic data using Walsh functions. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 24:238–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ceccio SL (2010) Frictional drag reduction of external flow with bubble and gas injection. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 42:183–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Drazin PG (1958) The stability of a shear layer in an unbounded heterogeneous inviscid fluid. J Fluid Mech 4:214–224MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guin MM, Kato H, Yamaguchi H, Maeda M, Miyanaga M (1996) Reduction of skin friction by microbubbles and its relation with near-wall bubble concentration in a channel. J Mar Sci Technol 1:241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Helmholtz HV (1868) On discontinuous movements of fluids. Philos Mag 36:337–346,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kelvin L (1871) Hydrokinetic solutions and observations. Philos Mag 42:362–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kitagawa A, Sugiyama K, Murai Y (2004) Experimental detection of bubble–bubble interactions in a wall-sliding bubble swarm. Int J Multiph Flow 30:1213–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kodama Y, Kakugawa A, Takahashi T, Kawashima H (2000) Experimental study on microbubbles and their applicability to ships for skin friction reduction. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 21:582–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kodama Y, Hinatsu M, Hori T, Kawashima H, Takeshi H, Makino M, Ohnawa M, Sanada Y, Murai Y, Ohta S (2008) A full-scale air lubrication experiment using a large cement carrier for energy saving (result and analysis). Jpn Soc Nav Archit Ocean Eng 6:163–166 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  11. Kumagai I, Takahashi Y, Murai Y (2015) A new power-saving device for air bubble generation using a hydrofoil for reducing ship drag: theory, experiments, and applications to ships. Ocean Eng 95:183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCormick ME, Bhattachayya R (1973) Drag reduction of a submersible hull by electrolysis. Nav Eng J 85:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moriguchi Y, Kato H (2002) Influence of microbubble diameter and distribution on frictional resistance reduction. J Mar Sci Technol 7:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Murai Y (2014) Frictional drag reduction by bubble injection. Exp Fluids 55:1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Murai Y, Fukuda H, Oishi Y, Kodama Y, Yamamoto F (2007) Skin friction reduction by large air bubbles in a horizontal channel flow. Int J Multiph Flow 33:147–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oishi Y, Tasaka Y, Murai Y, Takeda Y (2009) Frictional drag reduction by wavy advection of deformable bubbles. J Phys Conf Ser 147:012020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Park HJ, Tasaka Y, Murai Y, Oishi Y (2014) Vortical structures swept by a bubble swarm in turbulent boundary layers. Chem Eng Sci 116:486–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Park HJ, Tasaka Y, Oishi Y, Murai Y (2015) Drag reduction promoted by repetitive bubble injection in turbulent channel flows. Int J Multiph Flow 75:12–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Park HJ, Oishi Y, Tasaka Y, Murai Y (2016) Void waves propagating in the bubbly two-phase turbulent boundary layer beneath a flat-bottom model ship during drag reduction. Exp Fluids 57:178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Qin S, Chu N, Yao Y, Liu J, Huang B, Wu D (2017) Stream-wise distribution of skin-friction drag reduction on a flat plate with bubble injection. Phys Fluids 29:037103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sanders WC, Winkel ES, Dowling DR, Perlin M, Ceccio SL (2006) Bubble friction drag reduction in a high-Reynolds-number flat-plate turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 552:353–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schbauer GB, Scramstad HK (1947) Laminar boundary layer oscillation and stability of laminar flow. J Aero Sci 14:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schlichting H (1979) Boundary-layer theory, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Takagi S, Matsumoto Y (2010) Surfactant effects on bubble motion and bubbly flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 43:615–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Flow Control, Faculty of EngineeringHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations