Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, 59:167 | Cite as

Dual fluorescence ratiometric technique for micromixing characterization

  • David C. Bedding
  • Carlos H. Hidrovo
Research Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

To probe high-speed mixing within microfluidic devices, an imaging technique that uses fluorescent emissions as an indicator of fluorophore concentration has been developed. Given that fluorescent emission varies linearly with excitation intensity, higher powered excitation sources, such as lasers, must be used to collect sufficient emission information over short periods of time. However, since laser-based excitation sources tend to be spatially and temporally non-homogeneous, a ratiometric imaging technique is used to correct these fluctuations without removing concentration information. Image processing is used to determine the homogeneity of the ratio values and, by correlation to the concentration, the level of mixing for the whole sample can be determined. The accuracy of this technique is assessed by comparing experimental results to a parallel flow micromixer COMSOL simulation of the actual concentration and overlaying imaging results. The dual fluorescence ratiometric technique is accurate within 11% of the simulations. The technique is then used to characterize a serpentine droplet micromixer which uses chaotic advection to increase the rate of mixing throughout the sample. This system is characterized using four different oil flow rates for mixing measurements taken for three different height locations throughout the channel.

Graphical abstract

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by The Northeastern University start-up funds, and a NSF Award Grant CBET-1522841.

References

  1. Abbas Y, Miwa J, Zengerle R, Stetten F, Von (2013) Active continuous-flow micromixer using an external braille pin actuator array. Micromachines 4:80–89.  https://doi.org/10.3390/mi4010080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker M (2012) Digital PCR hits its stride. Nat Methods 9:541–544.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baroud CN (2010) Dynamics of microfluidic droplets. Lab Chip 10:2032–2045.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c001191f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baroud CN, Gallaire F, Dangla R (2010) Dynamics of microfluidic droplets. Lab Chip 10:2032–2045.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c001191f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll B, Hidrovo C (2012) Droplet collision mixing diagnostics using single fluorophore LIF. Exp Fluids 53:1301–1316.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-012-1361-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen J (2007) Photobleaching correction in fluorescence microscopy images. J Phys Conf Ser 16:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/90/1/012068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen KT, Natrajan VK (2010) Non-intrusive measurements of convective heat transfer in smooth- and rough-wall microchannels: laminar flow. Exp Fluids 49:1021–1037.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-0845-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coppeta J, Rogers C (1998) Dual emission laser induced fluorescence for direct planar scalar behavior measurements. Exp Fluids 25:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dittrich PS, Manz A (2006) Lab-on-a-chip: microfluidics in drug discovery. Nature 5:210–218.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1985 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gashti MP, Asselin J, Barbeau J et al (2016) A microfluidic platform with pH imaging for chemical and hydrodynamic stimulation of intact oral biofilms. Lab Chip 16:1412–1419.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5LC01540E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo Z, Zeng Q, Zhang M et al (2011) Sensors and actuators a: physical valve-based microfluidic droplet micromixer and mercury (II) ion detection. Sens Actuators 172:546–551.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2011.09.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hardy BS, Uechi K, Zhen J, Kavehpour HP (2009) The deformation of flexible PDMS microchannels under a pressure driven flow. Lab Chip 9:935–938.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b813061b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hassan A (1984) Stirring by chaotic advection. J Fluid Mech 143:1–21MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hidrovo CH, Hart DP (2001) Emission reabsorption laser induced fluorescence (ERLIF) film thickness measurement. Meas Sci Technol 12:467–477.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/12/4/310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huebner A, Srisa-art M, Holt D et al (2007) Quantitative detection of protein expression in single cells using droplet microfluidics. Chem Commun 2:1218–1220.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b618570c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huebner A, Bratton D, Whyte G et al (2009) Static microdroplet arrays: a microfluidic device for droplet trapping, incubation and release for enzymatic and cell-based assays. Lab Chip 9:692–698.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b813709a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ismagilov F, Tice J, Song H et al (2004) Microfluidic systems for chemical kinetics that rely on chaotic mixing in droplets. Philos Trans R Soc 362:1087–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jia P, Yang Q, Gong Y, Zhao J (2012) Dynamic exchange of counterions of polystyrene sulfonate. J Chem Phys 136:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3688082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones S, Thomas O, Aref H (1989) Chaotic advection by laminar flow in a twisted pipe. J Fluid Mech 209:335–357MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kamholz AE, Yager P (2001) Theoretical analysis of molecular diffusion in pressure-driven laminar flow in microfluidic channels. Biophys J 80:155–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76003-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim M, Yoda M (2010) Dual-tracer fluorescence thermometry measurements in a heated channel. Exp Fluids 49:257–266.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-0853-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim TJ, Kim M, Hann S et al (2015) Thermal characterization of microheated microchannels with spatially resolved two-color fluorescence thermometry. Microelectromechanical Syst 24:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kise DP, Magana D, Reddish MJ, Dyer RB (2014) Lab on a chip hyperspectral imaging detection. Lab Chip 14:584–591.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3lc51171e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kling K, Mewes D (2003) Quantitative measurements of micro- and macromixing in a stirred vessel using planar laser-induced fluorescence. J Vis 6:165–173.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03181621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kling K, Mewes D (2004) Two-colour laser induced fluorescence for the quantification of micro- and macromixing in stirred vessels. Chem Eng Sci 59:1523–1528.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2004.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin F, Saadi W, Rhee W, Wang S (2004) Generation of dynamic temporal and spatial concentration gradients using microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 164–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu RH, Stremler M, Sharp KV et al (2000) Passive mixing in a three-dimensional serpentine microchannel. J Microelectromechanical Syst 9:190–197.  https://doi.org/10.1109/84.846699 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mayinger F, Bockhorn H, Mewes D et al (2010) Micro and macro mixing. Scientific Publishing Services, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  29. Natrajan VK, Christensen KT (2009) Two-color laser-induced fluorescent thermometry for microfluidic systems. Meas Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/20/1/015401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pav J, Jana Ž, Milavec M (2016) Assessment of the real-time PCR and different digital PCR platforms for DNA quantification. Anal Bioanal Chem 408:107–121.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-9107-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sakakibara J, Adrian RJ (1999) Whole field measurement of temperature in water using two-color laser induced fluorescence. Exp Fluids 26:7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sakakibara J, Adrian RJ (2004) Measurement of temperature field of a Rayleigh-Benard using two-color laser-induced fluorescence. Exp Fluids 37:331–340.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-004-0821-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwille P (2005) Characterization of the photoconversion on reaction of the fluorescent protein Kaede on the single-molecule level. Biophys J 89:3446–3455.  https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.105.061713 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shi X, Xiang Y, Wen L, Chen J (2012) CFD analysis of flow patterns and micromixing efficiency in a Y–type microchannel reactor. Am Chem Soc 51:13944–13952.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie300985q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Soloff SM, Al E (1997) Distortion compensation for generalized stereoscopic particle image velocimetry distortion compensation for generalized stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 8:1441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Song L, Hennink EJ, Young T, Tanke HJ (1995) Photobleaching kinetics of fluorescein in quantitative fluorescence microscopy. Biophys J 68:2588–2600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stone ZB, Stone HA (2005) Imaging and quantifying mixing in a model droplet micromixer. Phys Fluids 17:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1929547 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Tan Y, Cristini V, Lee AP (2005) Monodispersed microfluidic droplet generation by shear focusing microfluidic device. Sens Actuators B 114:350–356.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2005.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tice JD, Lyon AD, Ismagilov RF (2004) Effects of viscosity on droplet formation and mixing in microfluidic channels. Anal Chim Acta 507:73–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2003.11.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tirandazi P, Hidrovo CH (2016) Generation of uniform liquid droplets in a microfluidic chip using a high-speed gaseous microflow. In: ASME 2016 14th international conference on nanochannels, microchannels, and minichannels, pp 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1115/ICNMM2016-8061
  41. Tirandazi P, Hidrovo CH (2017) Liquid-in-gas droplet microfluidics; experimental characterization of droplet morphology, generation frequency, and monodispersity in a flow-focusing microfluidic device. J Micromech Microeng 27:075020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Waggoner A (2006) Fluorescent labels for proteomics and genomics. Curr Opin Chem Biol 10:62–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang NS, Rinaudo P, McAvoy T (1988) Laser-induced fluorescnece monitoring of multicomponent aromatic amino acids. 196th Natl ACS MeetGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang MM, Tu E, Raymond DE et al (2005) Microfluidic sorting of mammalian cells by optical force switching. Nature Biotechnology 23:83–87.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wu Z, Nguyen N (2005) Rapid mixing using two-phase hydraulic focusing in microchannels. Biomed Microdevices 7:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yamada M, Kasim V, Nakashima M et al (2004) Continuous cell partitioning using an aqueous two-phase flow system in microfluidic devices. Biotechnol Bioeng 88:.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang Z, Matsumoto S, Goto H et al (2001) Ultrasonic micromixer for microfluidic systems. Sens Actuators 93:266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Multiscale Thermal Fluids LaboratoryNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations