Correlation between prostatic urethral angulation and symptomatic improvement after surgery in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms according to prostate size
- 47 Downloads
To investigate the effect of prostate anatomical factors on the changes in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and uroflowmetric values after surgery.
The medical records of 448 patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) from January 2006 to December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual urine volume (PVR) at 3 months after TURP were evaluated. Prostate volume, intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP), and prostatic urethral angulation (PUA) were measured using transrectal ultrasonography, and their effect on the changes in LUTS after TURP was analyzed using multivariable linear regression.
Among patients with prostate volume < 50 mL, preoperative IPSS total score (IPSS-t), voiding symptom score (IPSS-vs), and storage symptom score (IPSS-ss) were significantly better in patients with a smaller PUA (< 51°) than in those with a larger PUA (≥ 51°) (p = 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.020, respectively). Changes in IPSS-t, IPSS-vs, IPSS-ss, and PVR at 3 months after TURP were significantly correlated with PUA (p ≤ 0.001, < 0.001, 0.048, and 0.012, respectively). Multivariable linear regression revealed PUA to be independently associated with changes in IPPS-t and IPSS-vs (p = 0.025 and < 0.001, respectively) only in patients with prostate volume < 50 mL.
Prostatic urethral angulation was significantly associated with postoperative changes in LUTS only in patients with small prostate, and had no clinical significance in patients with large prostate. In patients with small prostate and large PUA, surgery should actively be considered.
KeywordsBenign prostatic hyperplasia Lower urinary tract symptom Prostate Urethra
This research was supported by Hanmi Healthcare Inc. (H20180764).
MS: project development, data collection, manuscript writing. WJB: data collection. CYO: project development, manuscript writing. YSL: data collection. JSC: data collection.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
The Institutional Review Board of Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Republic of Korea, approved this study (No. 2018-07-023).
A waiver of informed consent was granted due to the retrospective nature of this study.
- 4.Bang WJ, Kim HW, Lee JY, Lee DH, Hah YS, Lee HH, Koo KC, Yu HS, Ham WS, Cho KS (2012) Prostatic urethral angulation associated with urinary flow rate and urinary symptom scores in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Urology 80(6):1333–1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.058 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Mayer EK, Kroeze SG, Chopra S, Bottle A, Patel A (2012) Examining the 'gold standard': a comparative critical analysis of three consecutive decades of monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) outcomes. BJU Int 110(11):1595–1601. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11119.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Park YJ, Bae KH, Jin BS, Jung HJ, Park JS (2012) Is increased prostatic urethral angle related to lower urinary tract symptoms in males with benign prostatic hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms? Korean J Urol 53(6):410–413. https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2012.53.6.410 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hirayama K, Masui K, Hamada A, Shichiri Y, Masuzawa N, Hamada S (2015) Evaluation of intravesical prostatic protrusion as a predictor of dutasteride-resistant lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic enlargement with a high likelihood of surgical intervention. Urology 86(3):565–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.021 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Sciarra A, D'Eramo G, Casale P, Loreto A, Buscarini M, Di Nicola S, Seccareccia F, Di Silverio F (1998) Relationship among symptom score, prostate volume, and urinary flow rates in 543 patients with and without benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate 34(2):121–128 (discussion 129) CrossRefGoogle Scholar