Advances in robotic surgery for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction and vesicoureteral reflux: history, present, and future
The introduction of robotic surgical technology into urological reconstruction, particularly pediatrics, has introduced new horizons for reducing the morbidity and enhancing the efficacy of surgical repair of congenital conditions in children. In reviewing the evolution of pediatric urological applications of robotic surgery, we wanted to address the different levels of reported utilization of pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation as two of the most common procedures.
Review of the published literature sought to explore the described variation in clinical application of these two common procedures, and the evolution of the practice over time.
Reported outcomes suggest that variations in patient selection, the learning curve and in reporting of outcomes all contribute to the wide variation in utilization of pediatric robotic pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation.
These technologies are demonstrating their potential as well as the challenges of use in children and there is a steady evolution of capability. Practitioners should be aware of both the possibilities as well as the risks of such new technology in the care of our patients. This requires thorough and open reporting of outcomes, the willingness to introduce change and integrate new findings into practice.
KeywordsRobotic surgery Pediatric Urology Pyeloplasty Ureteral reimplantation
- 4.Bowen DK, Faasse MA, Liu DB, Gong EM, Lindgren BW, Johnson EK (2016) Use of pediatric open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in the United States: 2000–2012. J Urol 196(1):207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.065 (Epub 2016 Feb 13) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Ehrlich RM, Gershman A, Fuchs G (1993) Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux: initial case reports. J Endourol 7:S171Google Scholar
- 18.Janetschek G, Radmayr C, Bartsch G (1995) Laparoscopic ureteral anti-reflux plasty reimplantation. First clinical experience. Ann Urol (Paris) 29(2):101–105Google Scholar
- 24.Boysen WR, Ellison JS, Kim C, Koh CJ, Noh P, Whittam B, Palmer B, Shukla A, Kirsch A, Gundeti MS (2017) Multi-institutional review of outcomes and complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. J Urol 197(6):1555–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Varda BK, Wang Y, Chung BI, Lee RS, Kurtz MP, Nelson CP, Chang SL (2018) Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015. J Pediatr Urol 14(4):336.e1–336.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.12.010 (Epub 2018 Feb 22. PubMed PMID: 29530407; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6105565) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Silay MS, Spinoit AF, Undre S, Fiala V, Tandogdu Z, Garmanova T, Guttilla A, Sancaktutar AA, Haid B, Waldert M, Goyal A, Serefoglu EC, Baldassarre E, Manzoni G, Radford A, Subramaniam R, Cherian A, Hoebeke P, Jacobs M, Rocco B, Yuriy R, Zattoni F, Kocvara R, Koh CJ (2016) Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party. J Pediatr Urol 12(4):229.e1–229.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.007 (Epub 2016 May 12) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Kassite I, Braik K, Villemagne T, Lardy H, Binet A (2018) The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a multi-outcome approach. J Pediatr Urol 14(6):570.e1–570.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.07.019 (Epub 2018 Aug 2 PubMed PMID: 30177385) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Grimsby GM, Dwyer ME, Jacobs MA, Ost MC, Schneck FX, Cannon GM, Gargollo PC (2015) Multi-institutional review of outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation. J Urol 193(5 Suppl):1791–1795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.128 (Epub 2014 Oct 7) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Baek M, Silay MS, Au JK, Huang GO, Elizondo RA, Puttmann KT, Janzen NK, Seth A, Roth DR, Koh CJ (2018) Does the use of 5 mm instruments affect the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in smaller working spaces? A comparative analysis of infants and older children. J Pediatr Urol 14(6):537.e1–537.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.06.010 (Epub 2018 Jul 6 PubMed PMID: 30007500) CrossRefGoogle Scholar