Validation of the endoscopic stone treatment step 1 (EST-s1): a novel EAU training and assessment tool for basic endoscopic stone treatment skills—a collaborative work by ESU, ESUT and EULIS
- 32 Downloads
The endoscopic stone treatment step 1 (EST s1) protocol has been developed after 2 years of collaborative work between different European Association of Urology (EAU) sections.
In this study, we added construct validity evidence to the EST s1 curriculum.
Materials and methods
The EST-s1 curriculum includes four standardized tasks: flexible cystoscopy, rigid cystoscopy, semi-rigid URS and flexible URS. Validation was performed during the annual 2016 EUREP meeting in Prague. 124 participants provided information on their endoscopic logbook and carried out these 4 tasks during a DVD recorded session. Recordings were anonymized and blindly assessed independently by five proctors. Inter-rater reliability was checked on a sample of five videos by the calculation of intra-class correlation coefficient. Task-specific clinical background of participants was correlated with their personal performance on the simulator. Breakpoint analysis was used to define the minimum number of performed cases, to be considered “proficient”. “Proficient” and “Non-proficient” groups were compared for construct validity assessment. Likert scale-based questionnaires were used to test content and to comment on when the EST-s1 exams should be undertaken within the residency program.
124 participants (105 final-year residents and 19 faculty members) took part in this study. The breakpoint analysis showed a significant change in performance curve at 36, 41, 67 and 206 s, respectively, corresponding to 30, 60, 25 and 120 clinical cases for each of the 4 tasks. EST-s1 was scored as a valid training tool, correctly representing the procedures performed in each task. Experts felt that this curriculum is best used during the third year of residency training.
Our validation study successfully demonstrated correlation between clinical expertise and EST-s1 tasks, adding construct validity evidence to it. Our work also demonstrates the successful collaboration established within various EAU sections.
KeywordsStone treatment Training EST-s1 Hands-on training Education Curriculum Training protocol
European Association of Urology
Young Academic Urologists
European Urology Residents Education Programme
Endoscopic stone treatment step 1 (curriculum)
European School of Urology
European Section of Uro-Technology
European Section of Urolithiasis
ESU Training Group members are: Ben Van Cleynenbreugel, Domenico Veneziano, Ali Gozen, Bhaskar Somani. All their institutions are already in the paper as they are also listed as authors.
DV: project development, data Collection, and manuscript writing. AP: data collection. SP: data collection. TT: data collection. GK: data collection. GT: statistics. BVC: data collection. AG: data collection. AB: data collection. JP: data collection. KS: data collection. EL: data collection. KA: data collection. BKS: project development and manuscript writing.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 4.Veneziano D, Ahmed K, Van Cleynenbreugel BSEP, Gözen AS, Palou J, Sarica K, Liatsikos EN, Sanguedolce F, Honeck P, Alvarez-Maestro M, Papatsoris A, Kallidonis P, Greco F, Breda A, Somani B (2017) Development methodology of the novel endoscopic stone treatment step 1 (EST s1) training/assessment curriculum. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0248 Google Scholar
- 5.Türk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Tepeler A, Thomas K, Dabestani S, Drake T, Grivas N, Ruhayel Y (2017) EAU guidelines on urolithiasisGoogle Scholar
- 6.Hananel D, Stubbs J, Sweet R (2015) Simulator development—from idea to prototype to product. In: Aggarwal R, Korndorfer J, Cannon-Bowers J (ed) ACS principles and practice for simulation and surgical education research. American College of Surgeons, Chicago, pp 138–152Google Scholar
- 7.Brinkman W, Tjiam IM, Schout BMA, Hendrikx AJM, Witjes JA, Scherpbier AJJA, et al. Designing simulator-based training for nephrostomy procedure: an integrated approach of cognitive task analysis (CTA) and 4-component instructional design (4C/ID). J Endourol. 2011;25:A29-AGoogle Scholar
- 9.EST s1 video instructions. https://uroweb.org/education/online-education/surgicaleducation/endoscopic-stone-treatment-est/
- 19.Veneziano D, Minervini A, Beatty J et al (2016 Apr) Construct, content and face validity of the camera handling trainer (CHT): a new E-BLUS training task for 30° laparoscope navigation skills. World J Urol 34(4):479–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1657-6 (Epub 2015 Aug 6) CrossRefGoogle Scholar