Updates on the use of intravesical therapies for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: how, when and what
- 20 Downloads
Intravesical therapy has been an important aspect of the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) for 40 years. Bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG) is considered standard of care for intermediate and high-grade non-invasive disease, yet understanding the nuances of subsequent intravesical therapy is important for any provider managing bladder cancer. Herein, we review the literature and describe optimal use of intravesical therapies for NMIBC.
A comprehensive search of the medical literature was performed and highlighted in this review of intravesical therapy for NMIBC.
Post-resection intravesical Mitomycin C therapy for low-risk disease remains an important component of care, and gemcitabine now has level-one evidence demonstrating efficacy in this setting but is not yet a guideline recommendation. BCG intravesical therapy remains the most effective therapy preventing recurrence and progression of intermediate and high-risk NMIBC. Adequately characterizing BCG-failure is critical in determining the next step in management which includes radical cystectomy, additional intravesical immunotherapy, chemotherapy with intravesical gemcitabine ± docetaxel and clinical trials.
Intravesical therapy remains the mainstay of treatment for NMIBC and bladder preservation. Intravesical induction BCG followed by maintenance therapy remains standard of care for intermediate and high-risk patients. Detailing the timing and characteristics of recurrence after intravesical therapy is crucial in determining subsequent treatment recommendations. Current clinical trials focus on systemic immunotherapy and enhancing the intravesical immune response by augmenting the delivery mechanism.
KeywordsNon-muscle invasive bladder cancer Intravesical therapy BCG failure
CP: protocol/project development, data collection/management, analysis, manuscript writing, supervision. JC: data collection/management, analysis, manuscript writing, critical revisions. MA: analysis, manuscript editing. AK: critical revisions, supervision. SG: protocol/project development, data collection/management, analysis, manuscript editing, critical revisions, supervision. PS: protocol/project development, project management, critical revisions, supervision.
No funding was required for this work.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest or relevant disclosures to this work.
No patient data was included in this report and informed consent was not required.
- 13.Witjes JA, Palou J, Soloway M et al (2013) Current clinical practice gaps in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with emphasis on the use of bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG): results of an international individual patient data survey (IPDS). BJU Int. 112(6):742–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Messing EM, Tangen CM, Lerner SP et al (2018) Effect of intravesical instillation of gemcitabine vs saline immediately following resection of suspected low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer on tumor recurrence: SWOG S0337 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 319(18):1880–1888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Cambier S, Sylvester RJ, Collette L et al (2016) EORTC nomograms and risk groups for predicting recurrence, progression, and disease-specific and overall survival in non-muscle-invasive stage Ta-T1 urothelial bladder cancer patients treated with 1-3 years of maintenance bacillus Calmette–Guerin. Eur Urol 69(1):60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W et al (2006) Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol 49(3):466–477 (discussion 467–475) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Sylvester RJ, Oosterlinck W, Holmang S et al (2016) Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing a single immediate instillation of chemotherapy after transurethral resection with transurethral resection alone in patients with stage pTa–pT1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: which patients benefit from the instillation? Eur Urol 69(2):231–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Filson CP, Montgomery JS, Dailey SM et al (2014) Complications associated with single-dose, perioperative mitomycin-C for patients undergoing bladder tumor resection. Urol Oncol 32(1):40 e41–40 e48Google Scholar
- 30.Sylvester RJ, Brausi MA, Kirkels WJ et al (2010) Long-term efficacy results of EORTC genito-urinary group randomized phase 3 study 30911 comparing intravesical instillations of epirubicin, bacillus Calmette–Guerin, and bacillus Calmette–Guerin plus isoniazid in patients with intermediate- and high-risk stage Ta T1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol 57(5):766–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Oddens J, Brausi M, Sylvester R et al (2013) Final results of an EORTC-GU cancers group randomized study of maintenance bacillus Calmette–Guerin in intermediate- and high-risk Ta, T1 papillary carcinoma of the urinary bladder: one-third dose versus full dose and 1 year versus 3 years of maintenance. Eur Urol 63(3):462–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Witjes JA, Kurth K (2005) Bacillus calmette–Guerin versus chemotherapy for the intravesical treatment of patients with carcinoma in situ of the bladder: a meta-analysis of the published results of randomized clinical trials. J Urol 174(1):86–91 (discussion 82–91) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Duchek M, Johansson R, Jahnson S et al (2010) Bacillus Calmette-Guerin is superior to a combination of epirubicin and interferon-alpha2b in the intravesical treatment of patients with stage T1 urinary bladder cancer. A prospective, randomized, Nordic study. Eur Urol 57(1):25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.de Reijke TM, Kurth KH, Sylvester RJ et al (2005) Bacillus Calmette–Guerin versus epirubicin for primary, secondary or concurrent carcinoma in situ of the bladder: results of a European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer–Genito-Urinary Group Phase III Trial (30906). J Urol 173(2):405–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Malmstrom PU, Wijkstrom H, Lundholm C, Wester K, Busch C, Norlen BJ (1999) 5-year followup of a randomized prospective study comparing mitomycin C and bacillus Calmette-Guerin in patients with superficial bladder carcinoma. Swedish-Norwegian Bladder Cancer Study Group. J Urol 161(4):1124–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 60.Nepple KG, Lightfoot AJ, Rosevear HM, O’Donnell MA, Lamm DL, Bladder Cancer Genitourinary Oncology Study G (2010) Bacillus Calmette-Guerin with or without interferon alpha-2b and megadose versus recommended daily allowance vitamins during induction and maintenance intravesical treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 184(5):1915–1919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 77.Packiam VT, Lamm DL, Barocas DA et al. (2017) An open label, single-arm, phase II multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of CG0070 oncolytic vector regimen in patients with BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: interim results. Urol Oncol 36(10):440–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.07.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar